Asus Zenfone 9 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Asus Zenfone 9
Asus Zenfone 9
See options
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
See options

The Asus Zenfone 9 (released July 2022) and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (released June 2023) represent distinct approaches to smartphone design. The Zenfone 9 is a compact, traditional slab-style Android phone, while the Razr 40 Ultra is a foldable clamshell device. Both run on the Android operating system, but their form factors introduce significant differences in user experience and functionality.

Scores

Durability

The expected practical lifespan of these devices is influenced by their release timelines, software support, and physical design.

  • Release Timeline: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, released in June 2023, is a year newer than the Asus Zenfone 9, which launched in July 2022. This difference in release date typically translates to a longer period of software support for the newer device.
  • Software Longevity: The Zenfone 9 was initially promised two major Android OS updates and three years of security updates, though some users have expressed concerns about the consistency of these updates. The Razr 40 Ultra is expected to receive three major Android OS upgrades and four years of bi-monthly security updates, offering a longer official support window.
  • Physical Durability: The Zenfone 9 features an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, along with Gorilla Glass Victus protection for its display, suggesting robust build quality for a traditional smartphone. The Razr 40 Ultra has an IP52 water-repellent design, which offers less protection against dust and water ingress compared to the Zenfone 9. Its foldable design, while innovative, introduces a hinge and a flexible internal display, which can be points of concern for long-term durability, though user reports after two years indicate the hinge can hold up well.

Release year

2022

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

Both devices are equipped with powerful internal components that deliver strong performance for a variety of tasks.

  • Processor Capabilities: Both the Asus Zenfone 9 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra utilize a current-generation processor, enabling them to handle demanding applications, complex games, and intensive multitasking smoothly. Users can expect responsive interactions and efficient operation across the Android interface.
  • Memory and Storage: The Zenfone 9 offers configurations with up to 16GB of RAM and up to 256GB of internal storage. The Razr 40 Ultra comes with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and 256GB or 512GB of internal storage. Higher RAM options on the Zenfone 9 may offer a slight edge in managing a very large number of concurrently open applications, while the Razr 40 Ultra provides a larger maximum storage capacity.
  • Battery Behavior: The Zenfone 9 houses a 4300 mAh battery, which, combined with its efficient processor and smaller display, often results in extended usage times, with many users reporting it can last through a full day of heavy use. The Razr 40 Ultra has a 3800 mAh battery. While its processor is efficient, the presence of two displays, especially the large external screen, can impact overall battery duration, though it can still manage a full day for many users.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display experience differs significantly between these two smartphones due to their distinct form factors.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Asus Zenfone 9 features a 5.9-inch AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks, offering a compact viewing experience. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra boasts a 6.9-inch foldable pOLED main display when unfolded, providing a much larger screen area. Additionally, the Razr 40 Ultra includes a prominent 3.6-inch pOLED cover display, which is highly functional for notifications, widgets, and even running full apps without opening the phone.
  • Resolution and Clarity: Both devices offer Full HD+ resolutions, with the Zenfone 9 at 1080 x 2400 pixels and the Razr 40 Ultra's main display at 1080 x 2640 pixels. This results in sharp and clear visuals on both, suitable for detailed content consumption.
  • Refresh Rate and Brightness: The Zenfone 9 has a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smooth scrolling and animations. The Razr 40 Ultra's main display offers an even higher 165Hz refresh rate, and its cover display reaches 144Hz, providing an exceptionally fluid visual experience. Both phones offer high peak brightness levels, ensuring good visibility even in bright outdoor conditions.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1080 x 2640

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Foldable LTPO AMOLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both smartphones are designed to capture quality images and videos, though with different strengths.

  • Rear Camera System: The Asus Zenfone 9 features a dual-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor that includes 6-axis gimbal stabilization, and a 12MP ultrawide lens. This gimbal system aids in capturing stable photos and videos, particularly in challenging conditions. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra also has a dual rear camera system, consisting of a 12MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a 13MP ultrawide/macro lens.
  • Photography Performance: The Zenfone 9's main camera is noted for capturing detailed images with accurate colors, and its low-light performance is generally strong, though some reviews suggest image processing can be inconsistent. The Razr 40 Ultra's main camera performs well in good lighting, producing bright and vibrant shots, and its wide aperture assists in low-light scenarios. The ultrawide camera on the Zenfone 9 is considered strong, while the Razr 40 Ultra's ultrawide also doubles as a macro lens with autofocus.
  • Video Recording and Audio: Both devices are capable of recording high-resolution video, with the Zenfone 9 supporting up to 8K at 24fps and the Razr 40 Ultra offering 4K at 30 or 60fps. The Zenfone 9's gimbal stabilization is particularly beneficial for video capture. Both phones offer stereo speakers for media consumption, and the Zenfone 9 uniquely retains a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Main camera

50 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

12 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements differentiate the user experience of these two devices.

  • Connectivity Options: Both smartphones support 5G cellular connectivity, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth for wireless communication. The Razr 40 Ultra features Bluetooth 5.3, a slightly newer standard than the Zenfone 9's Bluetooth 5.2.
  • Port Types: The Zenfone 9 includes a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, and notably, a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is increasingly rare on modern flagship phones. The Razr 40 Ultra features a USB-C port but omits the headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security and Design: Both devices incorporate a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Zenfone 9 is a compact device, weighing 169g, designed for easy one-handed use. The Razr 40 Ultra, while heavier at 188.5g, offers a unique foldable design that allows it to become very compact when closed, enhancing portability. Its build materials include Gorilla Glass Victus on the front and rear (or vegan leather on some variants) and an aluminum frame.

Weight

169 oz

1 oz

Screen size (in)

5.9

6.9

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Asus Zenfone 9 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra cater to different user preferences, each excelling in distinct areas. User sentiment for the Zenfone 9 often praises its compact size, strong battery life for its form factor, and robust performance. Its inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and IP68 rating are also frequently highlighted as advantages. Criticisms sometimes point to its camera processing not always matching the best in class and the lack of wireless charging.

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is widely lauded for its innovative foldable design and the highly functional, large external display, which offers a unique user experience. Its smooth performance and premium feel are also common points of praise. However, some users note that its camera performance, while good, may not fully compete with traditional slab phones in the same segment, and its battery life, while adequate, is smaller than many non-foldable counterparts.

Users prioritizing a highly portable, traditional smartphone experience with excellent one-handed usability, a long-lasting battery, and a headphone jack may find the Asus Zenfone 9 well-suited to their needs. Those who value cutting-edge design, a large and versatile external display, and the compact form factor of a foldable device will likely lean towards the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both devices offer a quality-assured refurbished option, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers seeking these distinct smartphone experiences.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons