iPhone 16 vs Motorola Moto E32

iPhone 16
iPhone 16
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$952.00

Versus A$1,399.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto E32
Motorola Moto E32
See options

The iPhone 16, released in September 2024, and the Motorola Moto E32, launched in May 2022, represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While both devices offer core smartphone capabilities, they cater to different user expectations through their operating systems, performance capabilities, and overall feature sets. The iPhone 16 operates on Apple's iOS, known for its integrated ecosystem, whereas the Moto E32 runs on Android, offering a more open and customizable experience.

Scores

Durability

When considering the practical lifespan of these devices, their release timelines and software support play a significant role. The iPhone 16, being a more recent release, benefits from a longer expected period of software updates and security patches compared to the Moto E32.

  • Software Longevity: The iPhone 16 launched with iOS 18 and is expected to receive major iOS updates for approximately five to six years, with its current operating system being iOS 26.4. The Moto E32, initially running Android 12, typically receives fewer major Android version updates and security patches over a shorter duration, reflecting its market segment.
  • Physical Resilience: The iPhone 16 features a Ceramic Shield front cover and an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating a higher level of protection against environmental elements. The Moto E32 offers an IP52 water-repellent design, providing basic splash protection.
  • Repairability Considerations: While specific repairability scores vary, the iPhone 16 incorporates design elements that can facilitate certain repairs, such as an electrically de-bonding adhesive for the battery. The Moto E32, with its plastic construction, may offer a different repair experience.

Release year

2024

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of the iPhone 16 and the Motorola Moto E32 differ considerably, influencing how smoothly they handle various tasks from everyday use to more demanding applications.

  • Processing Power: The iPhone 16 is equipped with a current-generation A18 chip, featuring a 6-core CPU and a 5-core GPU, designed for efficient handling of complex applications, advanced gaming, and intensive multitasking. The Moto E32 utilizes an octa-core Unisoc T606 processor, which is suitable for essential daily tasks and lighter applications.
  • Multitasking and Storage: With 8GB of RAM, the iPhone 16 provides ample capacity for seamless app switching and running multiple applications simultaneously. It offers internal storage options up to 512GB. The Moto E32 comes with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which can be expanded using a microSD card, catering to users with more modest storage and multitasking needs.
  • Battery Endurance: The iPhone 16 features a 3561 mAh battery, offering up to 22 hours of video playback. The Moto E32 is equipped with a larger 5000mAh battery, which, combined with its less demanding hardware, provides extended usage times for typical daily activities.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both devices is shaped by their distinct display technologies and specifications, impacting clarity, color reproduction, and outdoor visibility.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The iPhone 16 features a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a resolution of 2556x1179 pixels, resulting in a high pixel density of 460 ppi. This delivers deep blacks, vibrant colors, and sharp details. The Moto E32 has a larger 6.5-inch IPS LCD screen with a 720x1600 pixel (HD+) resolution and a pixel density of 268 ppi, offering a clear but less detailed viewing experience.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The iPhone 16's display can reach up to 2000 nits peak brightness outdoors, ensuring excellent readability in bright sunlight, and supports HDR content. It operates at a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Moto E32 offers a 90Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling, but its peak brightness levels are lower, which may affect outdoor visibility.
  • Design Elements: The iPhone 16 incorporates a Dynamic Island for interactive alerts and activities. Both displays feature rounded corners, but the iPhone 16's design includes thinner bezels.

Resolution

1179 x 2556

720 x 1600

Screen type

Super Retina XDR OLED

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the iPhone 16 and Motorola Moto E32 offer different capabilities for capturing photos and videos, reflecting their respective design philosophies and target users.

  • Rear Camera System: The iPhone 16 features an advanced dual-camera system with a 48MP main sensor that uses computational photography for detailed 24MP or 48MP images, and a 12MP ultra-wide lens. It includes features like sensor-shift optical image stabilization and a dedicated Camera Control button. The Moto E32 typically includes a 50MP primary camera and a 2MP secondary camera, designed for general photography.
  • Photography Features: The iPhone 16 excels in low-light performance, offers next-generation portrait modes, and can record spatial videos. It also supports macro photography. The Moto E32 provides basic photography modes, including an 8MP front camera for selfies.
  • Video Recording: The iPhone 16 supports 4K Dolby Vision video recording at various frame rates and Cinematic mode. The Moto E32 records video at 1080p resolution.

Main camera

48 megapixels

16 megapixels

Front camera

12 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical elements differentiate the user experience between the iPhone 16 and the Motorola Moto E32, from connectivity to physical design.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The iPhone 16 supports advanced Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3, and features a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, though it operates at USB 2.0 speeds. The Moto E32 supports Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n and Bluetooth 5.0, and also includes a USB-C port (USB 2.0) along with a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. The iPhone 16 supports 5G, while the Moto E32 is limited to 4G LTE.
  • Biometric Security: The iPhone 16 relies on Face ID for secure facial recognition. The Moto E32 incorporates a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for biometric authentication.
  • Physical Attributes: The iPhone 16 has an aluminum design with a Ceramic Shield front and weighs 170 grams. The Moto E32 features a glass front with a plastic frame and back, weighing 185 grams. The iPhone 16 also includes a customizable Action button.

Weight

170 oz

184 oz

Screen size (in)

6.1

6,5

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C (USB 2)

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

The iPhone 16 and Motorola Moto E32 cater to distinct user needs and preferences. Users often praise the iPhone 16 for its powerful performance, advanced camera capabilities, and long-term software support, making it suitable for those who prioritize a premium, integrated experience and demanding applications. Some users, however, note its 60Hz display as a point of consideration compared to some competitors.

The Motorola Moto E32 is frequently appreciated for its larger display with a 90Hz refresh rate, substantial battery capacity, and the inclusion of a headphone jack, appealing to users seeking essential smartphone functions and extended usage without frequent charging. Criticisms sometimes point to its more modest processing power and limited software update longevity.

Users prioritizing cutting-edge performance, advanced photography, and a robust software ecosystem will find the iPhone 16 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who value a larger, smoother display for everyday browsing, long battery life, and expandable storage for media, while operating within a more budget-conscious framework, may lean toward the Moto E32. Both devices are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons