Galaxy A23 vs Motorola Moto G62 5G

Galaxy A23
Galaxy A23
See options
Motorola Moto G62 5G
Motorola Moto G62 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$230.00

Versus A$890.00 new

See options

The Samsung Galaxy A23, released in March 2022, and the Motorola Moto G62 5G, launched in June 2022, are both smartphones designed for everyday use. Both devices run on the Android operating system, with the Galaxy A23 featuring Samsung's One UI overlay and the Moto G62 5G offering a near-stock Android experience. Key distinctions between these two models include their network connectivity capabilities and specific camera features.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, factors like software support and physical resilience are important. Both phones were released in 2022, but their manufacturers offer different update policies.

  • Software Longevity: The Samsung Galaxy A23 typically receives two major Android OS updates and four years of security updates, extending its software support further into the future. The Motorola Moto G62 5G generally receives one major Android OS update and three years of security updates.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A23 features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 on its display for enhanced scratch resistance. Both devices utilize plastic for their frames and back panels. The Moto G62 5G is noted for a water-repellent design, though it does not carry an official IP water resistance rating.
  • Expected Lifespan: Users prioritizing extended software support and a more durable screen will find the Galaxy A23 offers a longer practical lifespan in terms of updates and display protection.

Release year

2022

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone impacts how smoothly applications run and how efficiently daily tasks are handled. Both the Galaxy A23 and Moto G62 5G are equipped to manage common smartphone activities, though with some differences in their underlying hardware.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A23 is powered by a processor designed for efficient 4G connectivity, while the Moto G62 5G features a processor optimized for 5G networks. Users of the Galaxy A23 have occasionally reported slower performance and some difficulty with extensive multitasking. In contrast, the Moto G62 5G generally provides reliable performance for daily use and mobile gaming.
  • Storage and Multitasking: Both models offer various configurations of internal storage, typically 64GB or 128GB, and support expandable storage via a microSD card. RAM options for both devices range from 4GB to 8GB, influencing their capacity for running multiple applications simultaneously.
  • Battery Use: Both smartphones are equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, providing substantial power for extended use. The Galaxy A23 supports faster wired charging at 25W, while the Moto G62 5G supports 15W charging. The Galaxy A23's battery can last up to two days for some users, and the Moto G62 5G also offers good battery endurance.

Memory (GB)

4 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for any smartphone, and both the Galaxy A23 and Moto G62 5G offer large screens with high refresh rates, though they use different panel technologies.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Samsung Galaxy A23 features a 6.6-inch PLS LCD display, while the Motorola Moto G62 5G comes with a 6.5-inch IPS LCD panel. Both displays offer a 1080 x 2400 pixel resolution, providing clear visuals for content consumption.
  • Smoothness and Brightness: Both devices boast a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid visual experience. While the Galaxy A23's display is noted for its good resolution and size, some users have expressed a preference for AMOLED technology for more vibrant colors. The Moto G62 5G's screen offers good image quality and true-to-life colors, but its legibility in direct sunlight may be limited.
  • Protection: The Galaxy A23's screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5, offering a degree of resistance against scratches and minor impacts.

Resolution

1080 x 2408

1080 x 2400

Screen type

PLS LCD

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

For many users, camera capabilities are a significant consideration. Both the Galaxy A23 and Moto G62 5G feature multi-lens camera systems, each with distinct strengths and weaknesses.

  • Rear Camera System: Both phones are equipped with a 50-megapixel main camera. The Galaxy A23's main sensor includes Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), which helps reduce blur in photos and videos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Moto G62 5G's main camera does not feature OIS. For ultra-wide shots, the Moto G62 5G offers an 8-megapixel sensor, while the Galaxy A23 has a 5-megapixel ultra-wide lens. Both devices also include 2-megapixel macro and depth sensors.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A23 can capture decent photos in well-lit environments, but images may appear grainy and struggle with focus in low-light situations. The Moto G62 5G's cameras are generally considered adequate, though some users find them to be mediocre, especially in low light.
  • Video and Front Camera: Both phones record video at 1080p resolution. The Galaxy A23 records at 30 frames per second (fps), and users have noted a lack of stabilization. The Moto G62 5G can record at 1080p at up to 60fps with its main camera, and 30fps with its front camera. The Moto G62 5G features a 16-megapixel front camera, while the Galaxy A23 has an 8-megapixel front camera.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

16 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of a smartphone. The Galaxy A23 and Moto G62 5G differ in their connectivity, physical design, and additional features.

  • Connectivity: A significant difference lies in network support: the Motorola Moto G62 5G offers 5G connectivity, providing access to faster mobile data speeds where available. The Samsung Galaxy A23 supports 4G networks. Both devices include Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth (5.0 on A23, 5.1 on G62 5G), and a USB-C 2.0 port.
  • Physical Design and Handling: The Galaxy A23 measures 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm and weighs 195 grams. The Moto G62 5G is slightly more compact and lighter at 161.8 x 74.5 x 8.6 mm and 184 grams. Both phones feature a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking.
  • Audio and Ports: Both devices retain a 3.5mm headphone jack. The Moto G62 5G stands out with stereo speakers and Dolby Atmos support, enhancing its audio output for media consumption.

Weight

195 oz

184 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6,5

Network

4G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A23 and Motorola Moto G62 5G cater to users with slightly different priorities, reflecting their respective strengths and weaknesses. User feedback for the Galaxy A23 often praises its large and clear display, substantial battery life, and the inclusion of expandable storage and a headphone jack. However, some users have noted its performance can be slow, particularly with multitasking, and its camera struggles in low-light conditions.

Conversely, the Motorola Moto G62 5G is frequently commended for its 5G connectivity, generally reliable performance for daily tasks, good battery endurance, and enhanced audio experience through stereo speakers. Common criticisms include its camera performance, which some find to be underwhelming, especially in challenging lighting, and the use of an LCD display rather than an AMOLED panel, which can affect screen legibility in bright sunlight.

Users prioritizing a longer software support timeline and a main camera with optical image stabilization may find the Samsung Galaxy A23 to be a suitable choice. Those who value 5G connectivity, a slightly lighter design, and an enhanced audio experience for media consumption might lean towards the Motorola Moto G62 5G. Both devices offer a solid foundation for everyday smartphone use, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option can provide an eco-friendly alternative for either model.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons