

Refurbished price:A$303.00
Versus A$1,129.00 new

Ratings
The iPhone 12, a smartphone released by Apple in October 2020, and the Motorola Razr 40, a foldable smartphone launched in June 2023, represent distinct approaches to mobile technology. While the iPhone 12 offers a traditional slab design with a focus on a streamlined user experience, the Razr 40 introduces a unique folding form factor that prioritizes portability and a secondary external display. These differences extend to their operating systems, with the iPhone 12 running on Apple's iOS and the Razr 40 on Google's Android platform, each offering a unique ecosystem and set of features.
When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support are key factors. The iPhone 12, released in late 2020, benefits from Apple's reputation for extended software updates, typically receiving major iOS versions for five to six years from its launch. The Motorola Razr 40, being a newer device from mid-2023, is expected to receive three major Android OS upgrades, offering a slightly shorter, but still substantial, period of software support from its manufacturer.
Release year
Compatible with latest Update
Operating system
Foldable
The performance capabilities of the iPhone 12 and Motorola Razr 40 cater to different user expectations, influenced by their respective hardware and software optimizations.
Memory (GB)
The display experience on the iPhone 12 and Motorola Razr 40 differs significantly, primarily due to the Razr 40's unique foldable design and its dual-screen setup.
Resolution
Screen type
Both the iPhone 12 and Motorola Razr 40 offer capable camera systems, but they approach photography with different hardware configurations and software philosophies.
Main camera
Front camera
Beyond core features, several practical elements differentiate the iPhone 12 and Motorola Razr 40, impacting daily usability and connectivity.
Weight
Screen size (in)
Network
SIM card
Carrier compatibility
The iPhone 12 and Motorola Razr 40 cater to different user preferences, each excelling in distinct areas. Users often praise the iPhone 12 for its consistent performance, robust software ecosystem, and reliable camera system, particularly its strong low-light photography and video capabilities. Its traditional, durable design and extended software support are also frequently highlighted as positive aspects. Some common criticisms, however, have included its battery life, especially with heavy 5G use, and the standard 60Hz refresh rate of its display.
The Motorola Razr 40, on the other hand, receives commendation for its innovative foldable design, offering a compact form factor when closed and an expansive display when unfolded. Its high refresh rate screen and larger battery capacity are also noted advantages. Users appreciate the unique aesthetic and the utility of the external display. Potential concerns for some users might revolve around the long-term durability of the folding screen and the slightly less powerful processor compared to high-end traditional smartphones, though it remains capable for most daily tasks.
Ultimately, users prioritizing a proven, stable, and long-supported smartphone experience with a strong emphasis on video and photography will find the iPhone 12 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value a unique, compact design, a high refresh rate display, and the flexibility of a foldable form factor, along with the Android ecosystem, may lean toward the Motorola Razr 40. Both devices offer compelling features, and for those seeking an eco-friendly alternative, quality-assured refurbished options are available for both models, providing a sustainable choice.