Google Pixel 9 vs iPhone 16e

Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$717.00

Versus A$1,349.00 new

See options
iPhone 16e
iPhone 16e
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$838.00

Versus A$999.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Google Pixel 9, released in August 2024, and the iPhone 16E, launched in February 2025, represent distinct approaches to modern smartphone design and functionality. While both devices offer robust performance within their respective ecosystems, they cater to different user preferences through their operating systems and core features. The Pixel 9 operates on Android 14, emphasizing AI integration and a versatile camera system, whereas the iPhone 16E runs on iOS 18, focusing on streamlined user experience and strong battery performance.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of a smartphone, factors such as software support, physical resilience, and repairability are key. The Pixel 9 and iPhone 16E offer different timelines and approaches to longevity.

  • Software Support: The Google Pixel 9 is notable for its commitment to extended software longevity, offering seven years of operating system and security updates from its August 2024 release. In contrast, the iPhone 16E, released in February 2025, typically receives 4-5 years of major iOS updates. However, it's important to note that the iPhone 16E was discontinued in March 2026, which could impact its perceived long-term relevance for some users, despite continued software support for its active lifespan.
  • Physical Durability: Both devices feature strong build materials designed to withstand daily use. The Pixel 9 incorporates Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both its front and back, alongside an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance. Similarly, the iPhone 16E is equipped with Ceramic Shield protection on its display and an aluminum frame, also boasting an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance. User tests indicate both phones hold up well against drops and bends.
  • Practical Lifespan: The Pixel 9's extended software update policy suggests a longer practical lifespan for receiving new features and security patches. While the iPhone 16E's discontinuation might raise questions about its future, its robust build and initial software support still provide a solid period of usability. For users seeking the absolute longest software support, the Pixel 9 presents a more extended commitment.

Release year

2024

2025

Operating system

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both the Google Pixel 9 and the iPhone 16E are equipped with powerful internal components designed to handle demanding applications and multitasking efficiently within their respective operating systems.

  • Processing Power: The Pixel 9 is powered by Google's Tensor G4 processor, which is engineered for efficient handling of AI-driven tasks and smooth overall system performance. The iPhone 16E features Apple's A18 processor, which provides responsive performance for applications and supports Apple Intelligence features. While the iPhone 16E's A18 chip has a 4-core GPU compared to potentially more in other iPhone 16 models, it still delivers a fluid user experience.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Pixel 9 comes with 12 GB of RAM, facilitating seamless transitions between multiple applications and handling intensive workloads. It is available with 128 GB or 256 GB of internal storage. The iPhone 16E offers 8 GB of RAM and storage options of 128 GB, 256 GB, or 512 GB, providing ample space for apps, media, and documents. Both devices ensure that typical daily tasks, from browsing to gaming, run smoothly.
  • Battery Behavior: The Pixel 9 houses a 4700 mAh battery, demonstrating improved endurance over previous Pixel generations, with users reporting it can last a full day or more with moderate to heavy use. The iPhone 16E, with its 4005 mAh battery, is frequently praised for its exceptional battery life, often outperforming other iPhones in its class and lasting well over a day for many users. Both support fast charging and wireless charging.

Memory (GB)

12 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on a smartphone is largely defined by its display, and both the Pixel 9 and iPhone 16E offer high-quality screens with distinct characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Google Pixel 9 features a 6.3-inch OLED display with a resolution of 1080x2424 pixels, providing clear and vibrant visuals. The iPhone 16E comes with a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display, offering a resolution of 2532x1170 pixels at 460 pixels per inch, which translates to sharp images and text. Both OLED panels deliver deep blacks and rich colors.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Pixel 9's display boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations, and can reach up to 1800 nits HDR brightness and 2700 nits peak brightness. The iPhone 16E, while offering excellent clarity, has a standard 60Hz refresh rate. Its display achieves 800 nits typical max brightness and up to 1200 nits peak brightness for HDR content. The Pixel 9 also includes Adaptive Touch technology for improved responsiveness in various conditions.
  • Viewing Experience: The Pixel 9's larger screen and higher refresh rate may appeal to users who prioritize immersive media consumption and gaming. The iPhone 16E's display, while smaller and with a lower refresh rate, still provides a high-quality viewing experience with excellent color accuracy and brightness for outdoor visibility. The iPhone 16E retains a notch design, while the Pixel 9 features a punch-hole camera cutout.

Resolution

1080 x 2424

2532x1170

Audiovisual

Both the Google Pixel 9 and the iPhone 16E offer capable camera systems, each with its own strengths in capturing photos and videos.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Pixel 9 features a dual-camera setup on the rear, including a 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a 48 MP ultrawide camera that supports autofocus for macro shots. This configuration provides versatility for different photographic scenarios. The iPhone 16E has a single 48 MP Fusion main camera with OIS, designed to capture detailed images. It does not include a dedicated ultrawide or telephoto lens.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 9 is known for its strong computational photography, producing images with good detail, color accuracy, and dynamic range, especially from its main sensor. Its ultrawide camera is also capable, though some reviews note the selfie camera can be less sharp. The iPhone 16E's single 48 MP camera delivers consistent and high-quality photos for general use, with users often praising its reliability. Both devices are capable of recording 4K video at 60 frames per second.
  • Front Camera and Audio: For selfies, the Pixel 9 includes a 10.5 MP front camera with autofocus. The iPhone 16E features a 12 MP front camera. Both phones offer good microphone quality for calls and video recording, and provide stereo speaker output for media consumption.

Front camera

10.5 megapixels

TrueDepth 12MP

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Pixel 9 and iPhone 16E support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile data speeds. They also feature modern Wi-Fi standards (Wi-Fi 6 for iPhone 16E) and Bluetooth for wireless accessories. The Pixel 9 uses a USB-C port, which is also present on the iPhone 16E, marking Apple's transition to the universal standard. However, the iPhone 16E's USB-C port operates at USB 2.0 speeds.
  • Biometric Security and Navigation: The Pixel 9 incorporates an in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking and authentication. The iPhone 16E relies on Face ID for biometric security, a facial recognition system. Both devices include GPS and other global navigation satellite systems for accurate location tracking.
  • Design and Handling: The Pixel 9 measures 152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mm and weighs 198g, offering a comfortable in-hand feel with its refined design. The iPhone 16E is slightly more compact at 146.7 × 71.5 × 7.8 mm and lighter at 167g, making it easy to handle for many users. The iPhone 16E also features an Action Button, which can be customized for various functions, replacing the traditional mute switch. Notably, the iPhone 16E does not support MagSafe accessories.

Weight

198 oz

167 oz

Screen size (in)

6.3

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Google Pixel 9 and iPhone 16E each present a compelling package, tailored to different user priorities. The Pixel 9 is often praised for its advanced computational photography, extended software support, and a vibrant 120Hz display. Users frequently highlight its improved battery life and the seamless integration of Google's AI features as strong points. Some criticisms have pointed to the selfie camera's sharpness and the absence of a telephoto lens on the base model, which is reserved for its Pro variants.

The iPhone 16E, despite its relatively short market availability before discontinuation, garnered positive feedback for its exceptional battery life, robust build quality with Ceramic Shield, and the reliable performance delivered by its A18 chip. Users appreciate its compact size and the inclusion of the customizable Action Button. Common points of discussion include the 60Hz display, the single rear camera setup, and the absence of MagSafe compatibility, which might be a consideration for those invested in Apple's accessory ecosystem.

Users prioritizing a longer software support timeline, a higher refresh rate display, and a more versatile dual-camera system (main and ultrawide) may find the Google Pixel 9 to be a more suitable choice. Conversely, individuals who value outstanding battery endurance in a compact form factor, the streamlined iOS experience, and the physical durability offered by Ceramic Shield might lean towards the iPhone 16E. Both devices offer a quality-assured refurbished option, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers seeking reliable technology. Ultimately, the decision hinges on individual preferences for operating system, camera versatility, display fluidity, and long-term software commitment.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons