Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
See options
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
See options

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, released in September 2024, and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, launched in June 2023, represent distinct approaches to the foldable smartphone market. Both devices operate on the Android platform, offering unique form factors: the Pixel 9 Pro Fold features a book-style design that unfolds into a larger tablet-like display, while the Razr 40 Ultra adopts a compact clamshell design. Key differentiators lie in their display sizes, camera capabilities, and software support timelines, catering to different user preferences for foldable functionality.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these foldable smartphones, their release timelines and software support policies are significant factors.

  • Release and Support: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, released in September 2024, benefits from Google's extended software commitment, promising seven years of OS and security updates, extending its support until August 2031. In contrast, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, launched in June 2023, is slated to receive three major Android OS upgrades and four years of bi-monthly security updates, meaning its support will likely conclude around Android 16.
  • Durability Features: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers IPX8 water resistance, indicating it can withstand submersion, while the Razr 40 Ultra features an IP52 water-repellent design, providing protection against splashes and light rain. The Razr 40 Ultra also incorporates Gorilla Glass Victus on its cover display for enhanced scratch resistance.
  • Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing extended software longevity and robust water protection may find the Pixel 9 Pro Fold a more suitable option for a longer practical lifespan. The Razr 40 Ultra, while offering a durable build for its category, has a shorter guaranteed software update period.

Release year

2024

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

Yes

Yes

Performance

The performance of these devices is influenced by their internal components, impacting daily responsiveness and multitasking capabilities.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is equipped with Google's Tensor G4 processor, designed for efficient handling of demanding applications and advanced AI features. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, a processor known for its strong performance in everyday tasks and gaming.
  • Memory and Storage: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold comes with 16 GB of RAM, providing ample capacity for intensive multitasking and smooth operation across numerous applications. The Razr 40 Ultra is available with 8 GB or 12 GB of RAM, which is sufficient for most user needs, though the Pixel offers more headroom for power users. Both devices offer 256 GB or 512 GB of internal storage.
  • Battery Behavior: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold houses a 4650 mAh battery, supporting 45W wired fast charging and Qi-certified wireless charging. The Razr 40 Ultra has a 3800 mAh battery with 30W wired charging and 5W wireless charging. User reports for the Razr 40 Ultra indicate it can last a full day with typical usage, with features like AI charging to optimize battery health.

Memory (GB)

16 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a primary consideration for foldable phones, with both devices offering distinct panel technologies and sizes.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold features an 8-inch inner OLED display and a 6.3-inch outer OLED cover display. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 6.9-inch inner pOLED display and a more prominent 3.6-inch pOLED cover display. Both utilize OLED technology for deep blacks and vibrant colors.
  • Resolution and Brightness: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's inner display has a resolution of 2152 x 2076 pixels and a peak brightness of 1600 nits, while its cover display offers 1080 x 2424 pixels and 1800 nits peak brightness. The Razr 40 Ultra's inner display provides 1080 x 2640 pixels with a peak brightness of 1400 nits, and its cover display has a resolution of 1066 x 1056 pixels.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's inner display supports a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and responsiveness. The Razr 40 Ultra's inner display boasts a higher 165Hz refresh rate with LTPO technology, allowing it to dynamically adjust from 1Hz to 165Hz for power efficiency, and its cover display supports up to 144Hz.

Resolution

2076 x 2152

1080 x 2640

Screen type

Foldable LTPO OLED

Foldable LTPO AMOLED

Audiovisual

Camera capabilities are a significant aspect for many users, and these devices offer different photographic strengths.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold features a triple rear camera setup, including a 48 MP wide-angle lens with optical image stabilization, a 10.5 MP ultra-wide camera, and a 10.8 MP telephoto lens capable of 5x optical zoom and 20x Super Res Zoom. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a dual rear camera system, comprising a 12 MP wide-angle lens with optical image stabilization and a 13 MP ultra-wide-angle lens that also functions for macro photography.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold leverages Google's computational photography for detailed images, strong low-light performance, and advanced zoom capabilities. The Razr 40 Ultra's main camera performs well in good lighting, with its f/1.5 aperture aiding in low-light situations, though its ultra-wide lens has a narrower field of view compared to some competitors.
  • Video and Front Cameras: Both devices support 4K video recording at 30 or 60 frames per second. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold includes a 10 MP front-facing camera. The Razr 40 Ultra features a 32 MP front camera that uses pixel binning to produce 8 MP images.

Main camera

48 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

10 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these foldable phones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold includes Wi-Fi 7 (or Wi-Fi 6E according to some sources), Bluetooth 5.3, and offers satellite connectivity for emergency services. The Razr 40 Ultra supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3. Both utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, and neither includes a traditional headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold incorporates both fingerprint and face recognition for secure unlocking. The Razr 40 Ultra features a side-mounted fingerprint reader and face unlock.
  • Design and Handling: The Pixel 9 Pro Fold, with its book-style fold, offers a larger internal display for productivity and media consumption when unfolded, and a more traditional smartphone experience when closed. The Razr 40 Ultra's clamshell design prioritizes portability, folding into a compact form factor that easily fits into smaller pockets, with its large external display offering quick access to notifications and apps without unfolding. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold has an IPX8 water resistance rating, while the Razr 40 Ultra has an IP52 water-repellent design.

Weight

257 oz

1 oz

Screen size (in)

8.0

6.9

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra cater to different preferences within the foldable smartphone market. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold is often praised for its robust software support, offering seven years of updates, and its advanced camera system, which benefits from Google's computational photography. Users appreciate its larger internal display for multitasking and media, making it suitable for those who frequently use their phone as a small tablet. Some discussions highlight its comprehensive feature set, including satellite connectivity for emergencies.

Conversely, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra receives positive feedback for its compact clamshell design and its highly functional external display, which allows for significant interaction without opening the device. Users often commend its sleek aesthetic and the convenience of its pocketable form factor. While its camera system is generally considered capable for everyday use, some users note that it may not match the advanced capabilities of larger, non-foldable flagships. Its battery life is generally seen as sufficient for a full day, especially with intelligent charging features.

Users prioritizing a long-term software commitment, a larger internal display for productivity, and a highly capable camera system may find the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold aligns better with their needs. Those who value ultimate portability, a stylish clamshell design, and a highly interactive external screen for quick tasks might prefer the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both devices offer the unique benefits of foldable technology, and choosing between them depends on whether a book-style or clamshell form factor, coupled with specific feature priorities, is more important for the individual user. For those considering a more sustainable choice, exploring quality-assured refurbished options for either model can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons