Google Pixel 6a vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Google Pixel 6a
Google Pixel 6a
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$236.00

Versus A$569.00 new

See options
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
See options

The Google Pixel 6A, released in July 2022, is a traditional smartphone offering a focused Android experience. In contrast, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, launched in June 2023, is a foldable clamshell smartphone that prioritizes a compact form factor and a large external display. These devices cater to different user preferences, with the Pixel 6A emphasizing camera performance and software longevity, while the Razr 40 Ultra focuses on a unique design and interactive external screen. Both run on the Android operating system, but their approaches to hardware and user interaction diverge significantly.

Scores

Durability

The expected lifespan and software support differ between these two devices, largely due to their release timelines and manufacturer policies.

  • Release Timeline: The Google Pixel 6A was released in July 2022, making it an older model compared to the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, which launched in June 2023. This difference in release year impacts their respective support cycles.
  • OS Support Duration: The Pixel 6A is expected to receive Android OS updates until at least July 2025 and security updates until at least July 2027. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is promised three major Android OS upgrades and four years of bi-monthly security updates from its release, meaning OS updates until Android 16 and security updates until June 2027.
  • Repairability: The Pixel 6A has a relatively good repairability score of 7 out of 10, with components like the battery being easier to access and replace compared to some other models. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, being a foldable device, presents more challenges for repair, with some sources giving earlier Razr models very low repairability scores due to the complex folding mechanism and adhesive use.

Release year

2022

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

Performance characteristics vary between the two devices, influencing how smoothly they handle daily tasks and demanding applications.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a newer generation processor, which generally translates to smoother performance for demanding applications and multitasking. The Pixel 6A is equipped with a previous generation processor, still capable of handling everyday tasks efficiently.
  • Storage and RAM: The Pixel 6A typically comes with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. The Razr 40 Ultra offers more flexibility with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and storage options of 256GB or 512GB, providing more headroom for extensive multitasking and larger file storage.
  • Battery Behavior: The Pixel 6A has a larger battery capacity at 4410 mAh, which generally provides a full day of moderate use, though heavy usage may require a top-up. The Razr 40 Ultra has a smaller 3800 mAh battery, which, despite an efficient processor, may require more frequent charging for heavy users, especially given its dual high-refresh-rate displays.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a significant differentiator, with each device offering distinct technologies and form factors.

  • Display Technology and Form Factor: The Google Pixel 6A features a single 6.1-inch OLED display. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, as a foldable, has a 6.9-inch foldable LTPO AMOLED main display and a prominent 3.6-inch AMOLED cover display. The cover display on the Razr 40 Ultra is highly functional, allowing for various interactions without opening the phone.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The Pixel 6A's display operates at a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Razr 40 Ultra's main display offers a significantly higher refresh rate of up to 165Hz, and its cover display up to 144Hz, providing a noticeably smoother visual experience during scrolling and gaming.
  • Resolution and Clarity: Both devices offer Full HD+ resolutions, with the Pixel 6A at 1080 x 2400 pixels and the Razr 40 Ultra's main screen at 1080 x 2640 pixels, ensuring clear and sharp visuals for typical viewing distances.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1080 x 2640

Screen type

OLED

Foldable LTPO AMOLED

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, but with different strengths and features.

  • Rear Camera System: The Pixel 6A features a dual-camera setup with a 12.2 MP wide lens and a 12 MP ultrawide lens. The Razr 40 Ultra also has a dual rear camera system, consisting of a 12 MP wide lens and a 13 MP ultrawide lens. The Pixel 6A is known for its computational photography, which enhances image quality despite using an older sensor.
  • Low-Light and Everyday Photography: The Pixel 6A's software processing allows it to produce well-exposed and detailed photos in various conditions, including decent low-light performance. The Razr 40 Ultra's main camera, with its f/1.5 aperture, also performs well in low-light conditions.
  • Video Recording Quality: Both devices are capable of recording 4K video at 30 or 60 frames per second with their rear cameras. The Razr 40 Ultra's unique folding design allows for creative video recording angles and using the external display as a viewfinder.
  • Front Camera: The Pixel 6A has an 8 MP front-facing camera. The Razr 40 Ultra features a higher resolution 32 MP front camera, which can also be used for high-quality selfies and video calls.

Main camera

12.2 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of each device.

  • Connectivity: Both the Pixel 6A and Razr 40 Ultra support 5G connectivity, along with modern Wi-Fi standards (Wi-Fi 6E for both) and Bluetooth (5.2 for Pixel 6A, 5.3 for Razr 40 Ultra).
  • Ports and Sensors: Both devices utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer and lack a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. The Pixel 6A features an under-display fingerprint sensor, while the Razr 40 Ultra integrates a side-mounted fingerprint reader.
  • Build Materials and Durability Features: The Pixel 6A has an aluminum frame with a plastic back and Gorilla Glass 3 on the front, offering IP67 dust and water resistance. The Razr 40 Ultra features an aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus on its front and back, and an IP52 water-repellent design, indicating splash resistance rather than full submersion. The folding mechanism of the Razr 40 Ultra introduces different considerations for long-term durability compared to a traditional slab phone.
  • Weight and Dimensions: The Pixel 6A is a compact device, weighing 178g with dimensions of 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm. The Razr 40 Ultra, when unfolded, is larger at 170.8 x 74 x 7 mm and weighs 188.5g, but folds down to a much smaller, thicker form factor (88.4 x 74 x 15.1 mm), making it highly portable when closed.

Weight

250 oz

1 oz

Screen size (in)

6.1

6.9

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback often highlights the Google Pixel 6A's strong camera performance, particularly its computational photography capabilities, as a major advantage. Users appreciate its clean Android software experience and consistent updates. Some common criticisms include its 60Hz display refresh rate and, for some, the battery life not being as exceptional as previous A-series Pixel phones.

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is frequently praised for its distinctive foldable design and the utility of its large external display, which allows for more interaction without opening the device. Its high refresh rate screens also contribute to a smooth user experience. However, some users note that while its camera is capable, it may not always match the performance of traditional flagship phones in its price bracket, and the battery capacity is smaller due to its form factor.

Users prioritizing a compact, unique design with an interactive external screen and high refresh rate displays may find the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra well-suited to their needs. Its newer processor also offers a performance edge for demanding tasks. Conversely, users who value consistent software updates, a robust camera system with strong computational photography, and a more traditional, durable form factor with better water resistance might lean towards the Google Pixel 6A. Both devices offer distinct advantages, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons