Galaxy A35 vs iPhone 13

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
See options
iPhone 13
iPhone 13
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$415.00

Versus A$1,099.00 new

See options

The Samsung Galaxy A35, released in March 2024, and the iPhone 13, launched in September 2021, represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While the Galaxy A35 operates on Android with Samsung's One UI, the iPhone 13 runs on Apple's iOS platform. Key differentiators between these two devices include their display technology, camera capabilities, and overall performance profiles, catering to different user preferences.

Scores

Durability

When considering the practical lifespan of these devices, several factors come into play, including software support, physical durability, and ease of repair.

  • Software Longevity: The Samsung Galaxy A35 is expected to receive four major Android OS updates and five years of security updates from its release, offering a substantial period of software support. The iPhone 13, having been released earlier, typically receives iOS updates for approximately five to six years from its launch date, meaning its software support window is gradually closing. [1, 7, 18]
  • Physical Durability: The iPhone 13 features a Ceramic Shield front cover and an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance, indicating it can withstand submersion in up to 6 meters of water for 30 minutes. [4, 26] The Galaxy A35 comes with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front and an IP67 rating, protecting it against dust and submersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes. [3, 9, 15]
  • Repairability: Both devices are designed with modern smartphone construction, and their repairability can vary depending on the specific component and access to parts. Users seeking to extend the life of their device might consider quality-assured refurbished options, which often come with warranties.

Release year

2024

2021

Operating system

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, app usage, and multitasking, with both devices offering capable hardware for their respective ecosystems.

  • Processing Power: The iPhone 13 is equipped with a powerful processor that delivers smooth and responsive performance across various applications, including demanding games and video editing. [16, 22] The Galaxy A35 features an octa-core processor that handles everyday tasks, web browsing, and moderate gaming with efficiency. [1, 5, 7, 8]
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: Users of the iPhone 13 generally experience fluid transitions between apps and quick loading times, even with multiple applications running simultaneously, supported by its optimized operating system. [22] The Galaxy A35, with its available RAM configurations, provides a capable experience for multitasking, allowing users to switch between applications without significant delays. [1, 5, 7, 12]
  • Storage Options: The iPhone 13 offers internal storage options up to 512GB, providing ample space for apps, photos, and videos. [10, 20] The Galaxy A35 comes with up to 256GB of internal storage and includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage, offering flexibility for users who need more space for media and files. [1, 5, 7, 12, 23]

Memory (GB)

6 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both the Galaxy A35 and iPhone 13 offer vibrant viewing experiences with distinct characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The iPhone 13 features a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display, known for its deep blacks, high contrast, and sharp resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels. [4, 6, 10] The Galaxy A35 sports a larger 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, providing vivid colors and good clarity for media consumption. [1, 3, 12, 23]
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The iPhone 13's display can reach a typical brightness of 800 nits and a peak brightness of 1200 nits for HDR content, ensuring good visibility in various lighting conditions. [4, 13] The Galaxy A35 also offers a bright display with up to 1000 nits in High Brightness Mode, which aids in outdoor viewing. [3, 12, 17]
  • Refresh Rate: A notable difference is the refresh rate; the Galaxy A35 features a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid visual experience. [1, 3, 12, 23] The iPhone 13 has a standard 60Hz refresh rate. [2, 4, 13]

Resolution

1080x2340

1170 x 2532

Audiovisual

Both smartphones provide capable camera systems for capturing photos and videos, though they approach imaging with different hardware and software philosophies.

  • Rear Camera System: The iPhone 13 is equipped with a dual 12MP camera system, including a main wide lens with sensor-shift optical image stabilization (OIS) and an ultrawide lens, excelling in capturing detailed images and videos, particularly in challenging lighting. [4, 6, 13] The Galaxy A35 features a triple rear camera setup with a 50MP main sensor with OIS, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 5MP macro lens, offering versatility for different types of shots. [1, 3, 5, 7, 17]
  • Low-Light and Video Performance: The iPhone 13's larger main camera sensor and advanced image processing contribute to strong low-light performance and high-quality video recording up to 4K at 60 frames per second, including features like Cinematic Mode. [4, 13, 20] The Galaxy A35's 50MP main camera performs well in daylight, and it can record 4K video at 30 frames per second, with night mode available for improved low-light photos. [1, 3, 5, 7, 17]
  • Front Camera: For selfies and video calls, the iPhone 13 has a 12MP front camera capable of 4K video recording. [4, 6, 20] The Galaxy A35 features a 13MP front camera, also capable of recording 4K video at 30 frames per second. [1, 3, 5, 17]

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and daily usability of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity for fast mobile data. [7, 25, 26] The Galaxy A35 includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, along with a USB-C 2.0 port for charging and data transfer. [7, 24, 28] The iPhone 13 also supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0, but uses Apple's proprietary Lightning port. [10, 20]
  • Biometric Security: The iPhone 13 relies on Face ID for secure facial recognition. [2] The Galaxy A35 incorporates an under-display fingerprint sensor for biometric authentication. [27, 28]
  • Design and Handling: The iPhone 13 has a compact design, measuring 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.65 mm and weighing 174 grams, making it comfortable for one-handed use. [10, 19] The Galaxy A35 is a larger device at 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm and 209 grams, offering a more expansive screen for content viewing. [8, 12, 23] Both devices feature glass backs, with the iPhone 13 having an aluminum frame and the Galaxy A35 a plastic frame. [17, 22]

Weight

209 oz

173 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6,1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback often highlights the iPhone 13's consistent performance and robust camera system as strong points, with many appreciating its long-term software support and integration within the Apple ecosystem. Some users, however, have noted its 60Hz display as a point of comparison with newer devices offering higher refresh rates. The Galaxy A35 is frequently praised for its vibrant 120Hz AMOLED display, extended software update commitment, and versatile camera setup, particularly for its main sensor. Criticisms sometimes point to its low-light camera performance needing improvement and the presence of a plastic frame. [1, 7, 17]

Users prioritizing a compact device with top-tier performance, advanced video capabilities, and a long history of software updates may find the iPhone 13 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value a larger, smoother display, expandable storage, and a more recent Android experience with a strong commitment to future updates might lean towards the Galaxy A35. Both devices offer reliable performance for daily use, and choosing between them often comes down to individual preferences for operating system, screen size, and specific camera features. For those considering either model, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons