iPhone 16e vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

iPhone 16e
iPhone 16e
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$794.00

Versus A$999.00 new

See options
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
See options

The iPhone 16E (released February 2025) and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (released June 2023) represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While the iPhone 16E offers a traditional slab form factor with Apple's ecosystem, the Razr 40 Ultra stands out with its foldable clamshell design and Android operating system. The primary differentiators lie in their physical design, software ecosystems, and target user experiences.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is influenced by its release timeline, software support, and repairability.

  • Release Timeline and OS Support: The iPhone 16E, released in early 2025, benefits from Apple's extended software support, typically providing major iOS updates for five to seven years, with security updates often lasting longer. This suggests potential support until approximately 2032-2034. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, launched in mid-2023, is expected to receive three major Android OS upgrades and four years of bi-monthly security updates.
  • Software Longevity Expectations: Users of the iPhone 16E can anticipate a longer period of access to the latest features and security patches due to Apple's consistent update policy. The Razr 40 Ultra offers a respectable update cycle for an Android device, but it is generally shorter than Apple's.
  • Repairability: The iPhone 16 series, including the 16E, has shown improved repairability with a score of 7 out of 10 from iFixit, a significant improvement over previous models. However, software-based parts pairing can complicate independent repairs. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design presents inherent challenges for repair, with some reports indicating a lower repairability score for similar foldable devices.

Release year

2025

2023

Operating system

iOS

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

Both devices offer capable performance for daily tasks, but their underlying hardware and optimization strategies differ.

  • Processor Capabilities: The iPhone 16E is equipped with Apple's A18 system on a chip, designed to handle demanding applications and multitasking efficiently. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 chipset, which provides smooth performance for everyday use and gaming.
  • Overall System Responsiveness: Users of both devices can expect fluid navigation and quick app loading. The iPhone 16E's integration of hardware and software typically results in highly optimized performance. The Razr 40 Ultra also delivers a responsive experience, though some users have noted occasional minor lags in specific scenarios.
  • Storage Options and RAM: The iPhone 16E is available with 128 GB, 256 GB, and 512 GB storage configurations and 8GB of RAM. The Razr 40 Ultra offers 256 GB or 512 GB of internal storage and 8 GB or 12 GB of RAM.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display experience on these two smartphones is a key differentiator, primarily due to the Razr 40 Ultra's unique foldable form factor.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The iPhone 16E features a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a resolution of 2532 x 1170 pixels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra boasts a 6.9-inch foldable pOLED main display with a 2640 x 1080 pixel resolution and a 3.6-inch external pOLED display with a 1066 x 1056 pixel resolution.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The iPhone 16E's display offers a typical maximum brightness of 800 nits and a peak brightness of 1200 nits for HDR content. The Razr 40 Ultra's main display can reach a peak brightness of 1400 nits and features a high refresh rate of up to 165Hz, while its external display offers a 144Hz refresh rate. The iPhone 16E maintains a standard refresh rate.
  • Viewing Experience: The Razr 40 Ultra's large, functional external display allows for more interactions without opening the phone, enhancing convenience. The iPhone 16E provides a consistent, high-quality viewing experience on its single, flat display.

Resolution

2532x1170

1080 x 2640

Audiovisual

Both devices offer capable camera systems, but their configurations and strengths cater to different user priorities.

  • Camera System Capabilities: The iPhone 16E features a 2-in-1 rear camera system with a 48MP main sensor that can also provide 12MP 2x telephoto capabilities, along with a 12MP front camera. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra includes a dual camera array on the rear, consisting of a 12MP wide lens and a 13MP ultra-wide angle lens that can also function for macro photography. It also has a 32MP selfie camera on the internal display.
  • Photography Performance: The iPhone 16E leverages computational photography for detailed and color-accurate images in various conditions, including low light. The Razr 40 Ultra performs well in good lighting, producing images with good detail and color. Its main camera's wider aperture assists in low-light situations.
  • Video Recording Quality: Both phones are capable of recording 4K video. The iPhone 16E supports 4K Dolby Vision video recording at various frame rates. The Razr 40 Ultra can record 4K video at 30 or 60 frames per second.

Front camera

TrueDepth 12MP

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements distinguish these two devices.

  • Connectivity Options: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity. The iPhone 16E includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. The Razr 40 Ultra supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.
  • Port Types and Biometrics: The iPhone 16E features a USB-C port and relies on Face ID for secure authentication. The Razr 40 Ultra also uses a USB-C port and incorporates a fingerprint sensor, often integrated into the power button.
  • Build Materials and Durability Features: The iPhone 16E features an aluminum frame, Ceramic Shield front cover, and an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance. The Razr 40 Ultra has a 7000 series aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus on the external display, and an IP52 water-repellent rating. Its foldable nature introduces a hinge mechanism, which some users have noted can develop micro-cracks in the screen protector over time.

Weight

167 oz

1 oz

Screen size (in)

6.1

6.9

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The iPhone 16E and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra cater to different user preferences, each with distinct advantages.

Common praise for the iPhone 16E often highlights its seamless integration within the Apple ecosystem, consistent performance, and long-term software support. Users appreciate its reliable camera system and robust build quality. However, some user sentiment indicates a desire for more innovative features and a lower price point for an 'e' model.

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is frequently praised for its unique foldable design, which offers a compact form factor when closed and a large, immersive display when open. Its expansive and highly functional external screen is a significant draw, allowing for many tasks without unfolding the device. Criticisms sometimes point to its camera performance not matching top-tier slab phones and concerns about the long-term durability of the foldable screen, particularly the screen protector.

Users prioritizing a traditional smartphone experience with extensive software longevity and a strong ecosystem may find the iPhone 16E well-suited to their needs. Its consistent performance and durable design make it a practical choice for everyday use. Conversely, users who value innovative design, a compact form factor, and the versatility of a large external display will likely prefer the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Its unique folding mechanism offers a different interaction experience for those seeking something beyond a standard smartphone.

For those considering either device, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative, offering access to these technologies with a reduced environmental impact.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons