Google Pixel 7 Pro vs Motorola Moto E13

Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$520.00

Versus A$1,219.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto E13
Motorola Moto E13
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$121.29

Versus A$244.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Google Pixel 7 Pro (released October 2022) and the Motorola Moto E13 (released January 2023) represent distinct segments within the smartphone market. While both operate on the Android platform, the Pixel 7 Pro is designed as a high-end device offering advanced features and capabilities, whereas the Moto E13 focuses on delivering essential smartphone functions for everyday use. This comparison will highlight their practical differences to help users determine which device aligns best with their needs.

Scores

Durability

When considering the practical lifespan of these devices, several factors come into play, including software support, build quality, and material choices.

  • Software Longevity: The Google Pixel 7 Pro is expected to receive five years of security updates and three years of major Android operating system upgrades from its release, extending its software relevance further into the future. The Motorola Moto E13, typically, receives one major OS update and two years of security updates, offering a shorter period of guaranteed software support.
  • Physical Durability: The Pixel 7 Pro features a robust construction with Gorilla Glass Victus on both the front and back, complemented by an aluminum frame, and boasts an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. User reports indicate that while the display is resilient, the polished metal camera bar can be prone to scratches, and some flexibility has been noted in bend tests. The Moto E13 utilizes a plastic back and frame, offering a different kind of resilience to drops, and carries an IP52 rating for splash and dust resistance, meaning it can withstand light exposure to water.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing extended software support and premium build materials for long-term use may find the Pixel 7 Pro more aligned with their expectations. For those seeking a device for fundamental tasks with adequate protection against splashes, the Moto E13 offers a functional alternative.

Release year

2022

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two smartphones cater to different user demands, primarily influenced by their internal components and software optimization.

  • Processing Power: The Pixel 7 Pro is equipped with a current-generation processor designed for demanding applications, smooth multitasking, and advanced computational photography. This results in quick app loading, fluid navigation, and efficient handling of graphics-intensive games. The Moto E13 features a processor suitable for basic daily tasks such as web browsing, social media, and light applications. Users may experience occasional delays or stuttering when opening apps or navigating the interface, particularly with lower RAM configurations.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Pixel 7 Pro typically comes with 8GB or 12GB of RAM, allowing for seamless switching between numerous applications without significant slowdowns. Storage options range from 128GB to 512GB, providing ample space for media and apps. The Moto E13 is available with 2GB, 4GB, or 8GB of RAM, with the 2GB variant potentially struggling with multiple open applications. It offers 32GB, 64GB, or 128GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD card, which is beneficial for users needing more space for photos and videos.
  • Battery Behavior: Both devices house a 5000 mAh battery. However, the Pixel 7 Pro's higher-resolution display and more powerful processor can lead to varied battery endurance depending on usage, with heavy use potentially requiring more frequent charging. The Moto E13, with its less demanding hardware and Android Go edition software, is often reported to last a full day or more with moderate use.

Memory (GB)

12 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience offered by these devices differs significantly due to their display technologies and specifications.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Google Pixel 7 Pro features a 6.7-inch LTPO AMOLED display, providing deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. Its Quad HD+ resolution (3120 x 1440 pixels) results in a very sharp and detailed image, suitable for high-quality media consumption and detailed work. The Motorola Moto E13 has a 6.5-inch IPS LCD screen with an HD+ resolution (1600 x 720 pixels). This display offers adequate clarity for general use, such as reading and casual video viewing, but does not match the sharpness or color richness of an OLED panel.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Pixel 7 Pro's display can reach high brightness levels, making it comfortable to view even in bright outdoor conditions. It also features an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120Hz, which contributes to smoother scrolling and a more fluid user interface experience. The Moto E13 has a standard 60Hz refresh rate, which is typical for its category, and its brightness is generally sufficient for indoor use but may require maximum settings in direct sunlight.
  • Viewing Experience: Users prioritizing a premium, immersive visual experience with high detail and smooth motion will find the Pixel 7 Pro's display more appealing. For those whose primary use involves basic browsing and communication, the Moto E13's screen provides a functional viewing experience.

Resolution

1440 x 3120

720 x 1600

Screen type

LTPO AMOLED

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

The camera systems of the Pixel 7 Pro and Moto E13 are designed for different photographic needs and offer varying levels of versatility and image quality.

  • Rear Camera System: The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a versatile triple-camera setup, including a 50 MP wide lens, a 48 MP telephoto lens with 5x optical zoom, and a 12 MP ultrawide lens. This system excels in capturing detailed photos across various lighting conditions, including strong low-light performance, and offers advanced features like improved zoom capabilities and computational photography enhancements. The Motorola Moto E13 features a single 13 MP rear camera. It performs adequately in well-lit environments, producing decent shots, but struggles with detail and noise in low-light situations.
  • Front Camera and Video: The Pixel 7 Pro includes a 10.8 MP ultrawide front camera capable of high-quality selfies and 4K video recording. Its video capabilities are also robust, supporting 4K at 30/60fps with various stabilization features. The Moto E13 has a 5 MP front camera, suitable for basic video calls and selfies. Both front and rear cameras on the Moto E13 record video at 1080p at 30fps.
  • Overall Photography Experience: Users who prioritize advanced photography features, excellent image quality in diverse conditions, and high-resolution video recording will find the Pixel 7 Pro's camera system significantly more capable. The Moto E13's camera is best suited for casual photography and basic communication.

Main camera

50 megapixels

13 megapixels

Front camera

10.8 megapixels

5 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several other practical features differentiate these two smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The Google Pixel 7 Pro supports 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.2, offering faster wireless speeds and more reliable connections. It features a USB-C 3.2 port for charging and data transfer, but lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack. The Motorola Moto E13 supports 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5 (dual-band), and Bluetooth 5.0. It includes a USB-C 2.0 port and retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which can be a convenience for users with wired headphones.
  • Biometric Security and Sensors: The Pixel 7 Pro incorporates an under-display optical fingerprint sensor and face unlock for secure and convenient access. It also includes a range of sensors like an accelerometer, gyroscope, and barometer. The Moto E13 does not feature a fingerprint sensor, relying on traditional PIN/pattern/password methods and a less secure form of face unlock. It includes an accelerometer and proximity sensor.
  • Design and Handling: The Pixel 7 Pro has a more substantial feel with its glass and aluminum construction, weighing 212g. The Moto E13, with its plastic build, is lighter at 179.5g, potentially offering a more comfortable hold for some users.

Weight

212 oz

179 oz

Screen size (in)

67

6.5

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Google Pixel 7 Pro frequently praises its exceptional camera system, often highlighting its ability to capture detailed and vibrant photos across various conditions, including impressive low-light performance and zoom capabilities. The device's smooth performance and vibrant display are also commonly cited as strong points. However, some users have noted variability in battery life depending on usage intensity, particularly with heavy camera use or 5G connectivity. Concerns about the durability of the camera bar's finish and some structural flexibility have also been mentioned.

For the Motorola Moto E13, users generally appreciate its ability to handle basic daily tasks reliably and its extended battery life for light usage. Its clean Android Go software experience is also a positive aspect for many. Criticisms often revolve around its camera performance, particularly its speed and quality in challenging lighting, and its overall system responsiveness when dealing with more demanding applications or multitasking.

Users prioritizing a premium smartphone experience with advanced camera capabilities, a high-quality display, and robust performance for demanding applications will find the Google Pixel 7 Pro well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals seeking a straightforward device for essential communication, web browsing, and social media, where extended battery life for light use is key, may lean towards the Motorola Moto E13. Both devices offer distinct advantages for different user profiles, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option can be an eco-friendly alternative for either model.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons