Compare models

Galaxy S24 FE vs Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 1-year warranty
  • Free standard shipping
  • Free 30-day returns
Galaxy S24 FE
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$549.00

Versus A$639.00 new

See options
Galaxy Z Fold7
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$1,300.00

Versus A$2,499.00 new

See options

Differences at a glance

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) represent two distinct approaches to modern smartphone engineering within Samsung's ecosystem. While the Galaxy S24 FE functions as a traditional bar-style device focused on balanced everyday utility, the Galaxy Z Fold7 delivers a specialized book-style foldable experience with a transforming dual-screen design. Both devices run on the Android operating system paired with Samsung's custom interface, though their differing hardware architectures cater to fundamentally separate user expectations.

Available Models

Colour

Storage (GB)

Scores

Durability

When examining hardware longevity and software support, both smartphones offer robust multi-year update pathways, though their physical designs present distinct maintenance considerations.

  • Software longevity: Both devices benefit from extended operating system upgrades and security patches, helping maintain software relevance and protection over several years of continuous ownership.
  • Physical durability: The Galaxy S24 FE utilizes a conventional bar-style glass and aluminum construction, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold7 incorporates a complex folding hinge mechanism and flexible internal screen architecture requiring careful handling.
  • Expected practical lifespan: Traditional bar phones like the S24 FE typically feature higher resistance to daily wear over long periods, while foldables demand mindfulness regarding internal display protection.

Release year

2024

2025

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

Underneath their exteriors, both models deliver capable execution for daily tasks, though their hardware capacities and multitasking potentials diverge significantly.

  • System responsiveness: Both devices handle standard web browsing, social media feeds, and navigation smoothly, while high-end multitasking and resource-heavy gaming benefit from the advanced processing hardware packed inside the Z Fold7.
  • Memory and storage configurations: The Galaxy S24 FE provides standard memory allowances suited for typical app usage, whereas the Z Fold7 features higher RAM options designed to sustain heavy multi-window workflows simultaneously.
  • Battery behavior: Battery endurance varies under load, with the S24 FE managing standard daily routines reliably, while the dual-screen configuration of the Z Fold7 can draw additional power during extended tablet-mode usage.

Screen quality

Visual output represents a major dividing line between these two devices, contrasting a spacious single-panel layout with an expandable folding canvas.

  • Display technology: The Galaxy S24 FE features a flat, vibrant AMOLED panel, while the Z Fold7 opens up to a large dynamic folding screen that effectively transforms into a compact tablet.
  • Outdoor visibility and brightness: Both screens offer high peak brightness levels to ensure readability and clear text rendering under direct sunlight.
  • Refresh rate and smoothness: High refresh rate support ensures fluid scrolling, responsive touch tracking, and smooth animations across all operational panels on both devices.

Resolution

1080x2340

1968x2184

Audiovisual

Media creation and consumption capabilities reflect each model's physical form factor and target audience orientation.

  • Camera versatility: Both smartphones incorporate multi-lens rear camera systems capable of capturing detailed everyday photography and wide-angle scenery.
  • Low-light and video performance: Image processing software assists in reducing noise during evening shots, while stable video recording functions reliably for casual creators.
  • Media consumption: The expansive interior screen of the Z Fold7 provides an immersive environment for viewing videos and managing split-screen content compared to the traditional layout of the S24 FE.

Miscellaneous

Practical daily usability elements, including physical dimensions, connectivity, and accessory integration, define how each device fits into a user's routine.

  • Connectivity standards: Both models support modern high-speed 5G networks, stable Wi-Fi standards, and efficient Bluetooth accessories for wireless audio.
  • Physical handling: The Galaxy S24 FE maintains a familiar, uniform profile in the hand, whereas the Z Fold7 features a remarkably thin chassis design when folded, alongside a larger footprint when open.
  • Biometrics and ports: Secure unlocking is handled via responsive fingerprint sensors and facial recognition, with physical charging routed through standard reversible connector ports.

Weight

213 oz

215 oz

Screen size (in)

6.7

8.0

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

What the community thinks

User discussions and community feedback highlight distinct preference trends for each smartphone model. Owners of the Galaxy S24 FE frequently praise its reliable day-to-day utility, familiar handling, and consistent software performance. Conversely, Z Fold7 users often emphasize the productivity advantages of the expansive inner screen and the engineering achievement of its slim folded profile, while occasionally noting the trade-offs of carrying a heavier device with a specialized folding screen structure.

Users prioritizing a traditional, straightforward smartphone experience with robust everyday reliability will find the Galaxy S24 FE well-suited to their needs. Meanwhile, users who frequently multitask across multiple applications, desire a pocketable tablet experience, or prioritize cutting-edge screen versatility may lean toward the Z Fold7. Selecting a quality-assured refurbished option through platforms like Back Market provides an eco-friendly alternative for acquiring either device while supporting sustainable technology choices. Ultimately, the ideal choice depends on whether a standard candy-bar layout or an expandable folding configuration better matches your daily mobile workflow.