Galaxy A35 vs Motorola Razr 40

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
See options
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
See options

The Samsung Galaxy A35, released in March 2024, and the Motorola Razr 40, launched in June 2023, represent distinct approaches to modern smartphone design. While the Galaxy A35 offers a traditional slab form factor with a focus on robust specifications, the Razr 40 stands out with its unique foldable design, allowing it to compact into a smaller footprint. Both devices operate on the Android platform, providing users with a familiar software experience, though their core functionalities and target user experiences differ significantly.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release Timeline and Age: The Motorola Razr 40 was released in June 2023, making it slightly older than the Samsung Galaxy A35, which launched in March 2024. This difference in release date can impact the duration of future software support.
  • OS Support Duration: Samsung generally offers a strong commitment to software updates. The Galaxy A35 is expected to receive four major Android OS updates and five years of security updates. The Motorola Razr 40, on the other hand, typically receives three Android OS upgrades and four years of security patches. This means the Galaxy A35 is likely to maintain software currency for a longer period.
  • Build and Durability: The Galaxy A35 features Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both its front and back, offering enhanced scratch and drop resistance, along with an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. The Razr 40 incorporates Gorilla Glass Victus for its main display and has a water-repellent coating with an IP52 rating, indicating protection against dust and splashing water. Its foldable nature introduces a hinge mechanism, which is designed to be robust and hold at various angles.

Release year

2024

2023

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from browsing to demanding applications and gaming.

  • Processing Power: The Samsung Galaxy A35 is equipped with a processor that handles everyday tasks smoothly, providing a reliable experience for general use and moderate gaming. The Motorola Razr 40 features a processor that is suitable for lighter usage and general smartphone functions, though it may not be as efficient for intensive tasks or prolonged gaming sessions.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Galaxy A35 is available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, which can be expanded up to 1TB via a microSD card. The Razr 40 offers 8GB or 12GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of storage, but it does not support expandable storage. Users who require extensive storage for media or applications will find the A35's expandable storage a notable advantage.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A35 houses a 5000mAh battery, generally providing a full day of use even for heavy users, and potentially extending to 1.5 to 2 days with lighter usage. It supports 25W wired charging. The Razr 40 has a 4200mAh battery, which typically lasts a full day for lighter users and supports 30W wired charging and 5W wireless charging.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for any smartphone, and both devices offer distinct visual experiences.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Motorola Razr 40 boasts a 6.9-inch Foldable LTPO AMOLED main display, which can fold in half, and also includes a smaller 1.5-inch OLED cover display for quick interactions.
  • Resolution and Clarity: Both phones offer Full HD+ resolutions, with the Galaxy A35 at 2340x1080 pixels and the Razr 40's main display at 2640x1080 pixels. This ensures sharp and clear visuals for everyday viewing.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Galaxy A35's display has a peak brightness of 1000 nits and an adaptive 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and good visibility outdoors. The Razr 40's main display offers a higher 144Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 1000-1400 nits, contributing to a very fluid visual experience. The Razr 40's cover display has a 60Hz refresh rate.

Resolution

1080x2340

1080 x 2640

Audiovisual

For many users, camera capabilities are a significant factor in choosing a smartphone.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor (with Optical Image Stabilization), an 8MP ultrawide, and a 5MP macro lens. The Motorola Razr 40 has a dual-camera system on the rear, consisting of a 64MP main sensor (with OIS) and a 13MP ultrawide lens that also handles macro shots.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A35's main camera delivers vibrant and detailed photos in good lighting conditions, with reliable performance for everyday shots. Its low-light performance is decent but can be improved. The Razr 40's main camera also produces good images with nice colors in well-lit environments, though some users note that low-light results can be dull.
  • Video Recording and Selfie Cameras: Both devices are capable of recording video at up to 4K resolution at 30 frames per second from their main cameras. The Galaxy A35 has a 13MP front-facing camera. The Razr 40 features a higher resolution 32MP internal selfie camera, which can also record 4K video at 30fps. The Razr 40's cover screen can also act as a viewfinder for using the main cameras for selfies.

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several other elements contribute to the overall user experience.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth. The Galaxy A35 uses USB-C for charging and data transfer. The Razr 40 also features a USB-C port. Neither device includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy A35 incorporates an optical in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Razr 40 features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button. Both also offer face unlock capabilities.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A35 has a traditional slab design with flat sides and rounded corners, weighing 209 grams. It features a plastic frame with a glass back. The Razr 40, as a foldable phone, has a unique design that allows it to fold into a compact form. It weighs 188.6 grams and features a vegan leather back and an aluminum frame with a stainless steel hinge. The smaller cover screen on the Razr 40 provides quick access to notifications and widgets without needing to open the main display.

Weight

209 oz

189 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6,9

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and Motorola Razr 40 cater to different user preferences, each offering a distinct set of advantages. User reviews for the Galaxy A35 frequently praise its vibrant Super AMOLED display, reliable battery life, and capable main camera, especially for daylight photography. Some common criticisms include occasional UI stutters and less impressive low-light camera performance.

The Motorola Razr 40 is often lauded for its unique foldable design, which offers a compact form factor and a robust hinge. Its main display is also highly regarded for its smoothness and color accuracy. However, users sometimes point to its less powerful processor for demanding tasks and its camera performance, particularly in low light, as areas where it doesn't excel compared to some non-foldable alternatives.

Users prioritizing a traditional smartphone experience with strong software support, a large, vibrant display, and consistent camera performance for everyday use may prefer the Samsung Galaxy A35. Its expandable storage and higher IP rating also make it a practical choice for many. Conversely, users who value a compact, stylish design and the novelty of a foldable form factor, along with a clean Android experience, might lean towards the Motorola Razr 40. Its unique design allows for a different interaction style with its cover screen and flexible viewing angles. Both devices offer compelling features, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be a sustainable choice for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons