Galaxy A23 5G vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Galaxy A23 5G
Galaxy A23 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$219.00

Versus A$457.00 new

See options
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
See options

The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, released in late 2022, and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, launched in mid-2023, represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While the Galaxy A23 5G offers a traditional smartphone experience with a focus on core features, the Razr 40 Ultra stands out with its innovative foldable design and prominent external display. Both devices operate on the Android platform, but cater to different user preferences through their form factors and feature sets.

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, several factors come into play, including their release timelines, software support, and physical durability.

  • Release Timeline and Software Support: The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, released in August 2022, launched with Android 12 and has since received updates up to Android 15 as of July 2025. Samsung typically provides two major Android OS upgrades and four years of security updates for this model, with security patches delivered quarterly for the first two years and then biannually. [13, 20, 25, 36] The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, released in June 2023 with Android 13, is expected to receive three major Android OS upgrades, potentially up to Android 16, and four years of bi-monthly security updates. [2, 18, 29, 30, 39] This suggests the Razr 40 Ultra may offer a slightly longer period of major OS updates.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A23 5G features a traditional slab design with a plastic back and Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protecting its display, offering a degree of resistance against scratches and drops. [6, 13] The Razr 40 Ultra, as a foldable device, incorporates a more complex hinge mechanism and uses Gorilla Glass Victus for its cover display, providing enhanced scratch resistance. [3, 15, 26] User reports for the Razr 40 Ultra indicate that while the build quality is generally good, some users have experienced micro-cracks in the screen protector along the crease over time. [16, 41]
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Both devices are designed for several years of use. The Galaxy A23 5G's robust software support and conventional design contribute to a predictable lifespan. The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable nature introduces additional considerations regarding the hinge and internal display's long-term resilience, though its improved update policy aims to keep the software current for a considerable period.

Release year

2022

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two smartphones differ significantly, largely due to their internal components and intended user experiences.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is equipped with a processor that handles everyday tasks, app loading, and general multitasking smoothly. [23] It is suitable for typical smartphone usage, including browsing, social media, and light gaming. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, on the other hand, features a more powerful processor designed for demanding applications and efficient multitasking. [17, 32] This allows for a more responsive experience with graphic-intensive games and heavier workloads.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A23 5G includes a larger battery capacity, which generally translates to extended usage between charges for many users. [4, 44] The Razr 40 Ultra has a smaller battery, and some users have noted that heavy usage, particularly with the main foldable screen, can lead to more frequent charging. [3, 17, 41, 42] However, its fast charging capabilities can help mitigate this. [3, 26]
  • Storage and Multitasking: Both devices offer various storage options, with the Galaxy A23 5G supporting expandable storage via a microSD card, which is beneficial for users who need ample space for photos, videos, and apps. [5, 23] The Razr 40 Ultra comes with generous internal storage options but does not offer microSD expansion. [10, 11] The Razr 40 Ultra's higher RAM configurations also contribute to smoother transitions between multiple open applications. [10, 17]

Memory (GB)

4 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a key differentiator between these two smartphones, primarily due to their distinct form factors and panel technologies.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G features a 6.6-inch PLS LCD display, offering clear visuals and accurate colors, suitable for everyday viewing. [6, 12, 23] The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra boasts a 6.9-inch pOLED main display, which provides deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. [17, 24, 31] As a foldable, it also includes a 3.6-inch pOLED external display that can be used for notifications, widgets, and even running full applications. [14, 15, 24, 26]
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The Galaxy A23 5G offers a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid visual experience compared to standard 60Hz displays. [12, 23, 43] The Razr 40 Ultra elevates this with a 165Hz refresh rate on its main pOLED display, providing an even more responsive and smooth interaction, particularly noticeable in fast-paced content and gaming. [3, 11, 24, 26] Its external display also features a high 144Hz refresh rate. [15, 24]
  • Brightness and Viewing Experience: Both devices offer sufficient brightness for indoor use. The Razr 40 Ultra's pOLED main display can achieve higher peak brightness levels, which can improve visibility in bright outdoor conditions and enhance HDR content viewing. [10, 24] The larger, immersive main screen of the Razr 40 Ultra, combined with its foldable nature, offers a unique viewing experience, while the Galaxy A23 5G provides a consistent and reliable traditional smartphone display.

Resolution

1080 x 2408

1080 x 2640

Screen type

PLS LCD

Foldable LTPO AMOLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the Galaxy A23 5G and the Razr 40 Ultra are designed with different priorities, impacting their photographic and videographic capabilities.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G features a versatile quad-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a 5MP ultrawide, a 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor. [1, 7, 9, 20] This configuration allows for a range of photographic styles, with the main sensor capable of capturing detailed images in good lighting. [28] The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a dual-camera system on its exterior: a 12MP main sensor with OIS and a brighter aperture, and a 13MP ultrawide camera that can also function for macro shots. [3, 26, 27, 31] The Razr's external display allows these main cameras to be used for high-quality selfies. [15, 27, 32]
  • Low-Light and Everyday Photography: The Galaxy A23 5G performs well in well-lit conditions, producing colorful and vibrant images, though low-light performance can be a weaker area with some noise. [28] The Razr 40 Ultra's main camera, with its wider aperture and OIS, is designed to perform capably in various lighting conditions, including lower light. [3] However, some user feedback suggests that while acceptable, its overall camera performance may not match dedicated flagship phones. [35, 42]
  • Video Recording and Audio: The Galaxy A23 5G supports Full HD video recording at 30 frames per second. [9] The Razr 40 Ultra offers higher-resolution video recording, capable of 4K at 60 frames per second, providing more detail and smoother motion for video content. [3, 31] Both devices include microphones suitable for calls and basic recording, and their speaker outputs are designed for media consumption, with the Razr 40 Ultra featuring stereo speakers. [26, 31]

Main camera

50 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and differentiate these two smartphones.

  • Connectivity Options: Both devices support 5G connectivity, ensuring access to faster mobile networks. [1, 19, 44] The Galaxy A23 5G includes Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, while the Razr 40 Ultra supports the newer Wi-Fi 6E standard, potentially offering faster and more stable wireless connections in compatible environments. [1, 19, 45] Both also feature Bluetooth for wireless accessories and NFC for contactless payments. [1, 19, 37, 45]
  • Port Types and Sensors: The Galaxy A23 5G retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is a convenience for users with wired audio accessories, alongside a USB Type-C 2.0 port. [1, 13, 45] The Razr 40 Ultra exclusively uses a USB Type-C port and omits the headphone jack, a common trend in many modern premium smartphones. [19, 35] Both devices incorporate essential sensors like accelerometers, gyroscopes, and side-mounted fingerprint sensors for secure unlocking. [13, 26, 31, 37, 45] The Razr 40 Ultra also includes a barometer in some regions. [10]
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A23 5G has a traditional candy bar form factor with a plastic back, offering a comfortable grip and a familiar feel. [13, 20] The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design allows it to be significantly more compact when closed, making it easier to carry in smaller pockets. [3, 19, 27] When unfolded, it presents a large, immersive screen. The Razr 40 Ultra also features a water-repellent coating and an IP52 rating for splash resistance. [26, 31]

Weight

197 oz

1 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.9

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra cater to different user needs and preferences, each offering distinct advantages. User feedback for the Galaxy A23 5G often highlights its reliable battery life and capable camera system for its segment, making it a solid choice for everyday use. [28, 44] Some users note that its camera can sometimes overexpose in certain conditions. [28]

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is frequently praised for its innovative foldable design and the extensive functionality of its large external display, which allows for significant interaction without opening the phone. [15, 27, 38, 40, 42] Its powerful processor and high refresh rate displays also receive positive remarks for smooth performance. [16, 38] However, common criticisms include concerns about battery life for heavy users and camera performance that, while good, may not compete with top-tier non-foldable flagships. [16, 35, 41, 42] Some users have also reported minor issues with the screen protector along the crease over extended use. [16, 41]

Users prioritizing a traditional, dependable smartphone experience with strong battery life and expandable storage may find the Galaxy A23 5G well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who value a compact, stylish design, a highly interactive external display, and a powerful processor for demanding tasks will likely lean towards the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Both devices offer a pathway to modern smartphone technology, and for those seeking an eco-friendly, quality-assured alternative, considering a refurbished option for either model can be a sustainable choice.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons