Google Pixel 8 vs Oppo Reno10

Google Pixel 8
Google Pixel 8
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$465.00

Versus A$1,245.00 new

See options
Oppo Reno10
Oppo Reno10
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$297.00

Versus A$783.00 new

See options

The Google Pixel 8 (released October 2023) and the Oppo Reno10 (released May/July 2023) are contemporary smartphones offering distinct approaches to the user experience. While both operate on the Android platform, they differentiate themselves through their core processing capabilities, camera philosophies, and long-term software support commitments.

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, several factors come into play, including software support, physical durability, and ease of repair.

  • Software Support: The Google Pixel 8 offers an extensive commitment of seven years of OS upgrades, security updates, and feature drops from its release date, ensuring a prolonged period of up-to-date software. The Oppo Reno10 typically receives two major Android OS updates and three years of security updates.
  • Physical Durability: The Pixel 8 features Corning Gorilla Glass Victus on both the front and back, along with an aluminum frame and an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. The Oppo Reno10 uses AGC Dragontrail Star2 Glass for screen protection and has a glass back with a plastic frame, but a consistent official IP rating is not widely specified.
  • Repairability: The Pixel 8 has received repairability scores ranging from 5.5 out of 10 to 7 out of 10, indicating that while self-repairs are possible, some components like the battery can be challenging to replace due to adhesives. The Oppo Reno10 generally scores around 7.5 out of 10 for repairability, with accessible battery cables and pull tabs, though adhesive for the back cover and battery is also noted.

Release year

2023

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from app usage to demanding applications and multitasking.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel 8 is equipped with a current-generation processor designed by Google, which handles demanding applications and multitasking smoothly. This processor is optimized for on-device artificial intelligence tasks, contributing to features like advanced photo editing and call screening. The Oppo Reno10 is powered by a processor that provides solid performance for everyday use and can handle demanding games with minor graphical adjustments.
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices typically come with 8GB of RAM, allowing for efficient multitasking. The Pixel 8 offers 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, while the Oppo Reno10 is available with 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB storage options, with some variants offering 8GB or 12GB of RAM. Neither device supports expandable storage via a microSD card.
  • Battery Behavior: The Pixel 8 has a 4575mAh battery, which generally provides a full day of mixed usage, though heavy users might need a midday top-up. The Oppo Reno10 features a larger 5000mAh battery, often reported to last through a full day and sometimes into a second day with moderate use. The Reno10 also supports faster wired charging.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both devices offer vibrant viewing experiences with some key differences.

  • Display Technology and Size: Both the Google Pixel 8 and the Oppo Reno10 feature OLED displays, known for deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Pixel 8 has a 6.2-inch display, making it a more compact device. The Oppo Reno10 offers a larger 6.7-inch display, providing a more expansive viewing area.
  • Resolution and Clarity: Both phones offer Full HD+ resolutions (1080 x 2400 pixels for Pixel 8, 1080 x 2412 pixels for Reno10), resulting in sharp and clear visuals for everyday content consumption.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Pixel 8's display can reach a peak brightness of up to 2000 nits, making it highly visible in bright outdoor conditions. The Oppo Reno10 has a peak brightness of 950 nits. Both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid user interface experience.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1080x2412

Audiovisual

Camera capabilities are a significant consideration for many users, and both smartphones offer versatile systems for capturing photos and videos.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Google Pixel 8 features a dual-camera setup with a 50-megapixel main sensor and a 12-megapixel ultrawide lens. It is known for its computational photography, which enhances image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Oppo Reno10 boasts a triple-camera system, including a 64-megapixel main sensor, a 32-megapixel telephoto lens with 2x optical zoom, and an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens. The dedicated telephoto lens on the Reno10 provides optical zoom capabilities.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 8 excels in producing natural colors and detailed images, with strong low-light performance and advanced features like Magic Eraser and Best Take. The Oppo Reno10 delivers sharp pictures with natural colors, and its telephoto lens is beneficial for portrait photography.
  • Video Recording and Audio: Both devices support 4K video recording. The Pixel 8 offers features like Audio Magic Eraser to reduce background noise in videos. The Oppo Reno10's video quality from its main lens is generally good, though some reviews note the absence of optical image stabilization for video and a maximum of 4K at 30fps. The Reno10 includes dual stereo speakers for an immersive audio experience.

Front camera

10.5 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and device utility.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Pixel 8 and Oppo Reno10 support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6 (or Wi-Fi 6e/7 for Pixel 8), and Bluetooth 5.3 (Pixel 8) or 5.2 (Reno10). The Pixel 8 uses a USB Type-C 3.2 port, while the Reno10 uses USB Type-C 2.0. Neither device includes a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: Both smartphones feature an under-display optical fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Pixel 8 also offers face recognition.
  • Design and Handling: The Pixel 8 weighs 187 grams and measures 150.5 x 70.8 x 8.9 mm, offering a compact and manageable form factor. The Oppo Reno10 is slightly lighter at 180-185 grams and larger at 162.4 x 74.2 x 7.6-8 mm, featuring a curved display design.

Weight

187 oz

185 oz

Screen size (in)

6.2

6.7

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Google Pixel 8 often praises its advanced camera capabilities, particularly its computational photography features that enhance image quality and offer unique editing tools. Users also appreciate the long-term software support, ensuring the device remains current with updates for many years. Some common criticisms revolve around battery life, with some users finding it adequate but not exceptional, especially with heavy usage or on mobile data.

The Oppo Reno10 generally receives positive remarks for its attractive design, vibrant AMOLED display, and impressive battery life, often lasting a full day or more. Its fast charging capability is also a frequently highlighted benefit. However, some users have noted that while the camera system is versatile with its telephoto lens, its overall performance might not match higher-end devices in all scenarios, and the presence of pre-installed applications can be a minor concern.

Users prioritizing a compact device with cutting-edge computational photography and extended software longevity may find the Google Pixel 8 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value a larger, curved display, a dedicated telephoto camera, and longer battery life with rapid charging might lean towards the Oppo Reno10. Both devices offer a quality-assured refurbished option, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons