Google Pixel 7 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max

Google Pixel 7
Google Pixel 7
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$348.00

Versus A$879.00 new

See options
iPhone 13 Pro Max
iPhone 13 Pro Max
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$581.00

Versus A$1,689.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Google Pixel 7, released in October 2022, and the iPhone 13 Pro Max, launched in September 2021, represent distinct approaches to high-end smartphone design and functionality. While the Pixel 7 operates on the Android platform, the iPhone 13 Pro Max runs on iOS, offering users different software experiences. Key differentiators include their camera philosophies, display technologies, and overall ecosystem integration.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are important factors.

  • Release Timeline: The iPhone 13 Pro Max was released in September 2021, making it approximately one year older than the Google Pixel 7, which launched in October 2022.
  • Software Longevity: Google has committed to providing five years of OS and security updates for the Pixel 7, extending its support until at least October 2027. Apple typically supports iPhones with major iOS updates for around five to six years from release, with the iPhone 13 Pro Max expected to receive updates until at least 2028. This suggests both devices offer a substantial period of software relevance.
  • Practical Lifespan: Both phones feature durable designs, with the iPhone 13 Pro Max utilizing a Ceramic Shield front and stainless steel frame, and the Pixel 7 featuring Gorilla Glass Victus on both front and back with an aluminum frame. Both also carry an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. User reports indicate that the iPhone 13 Pro Max is a robust device that can last for several years, especially with battery replacements.

Release year

2022

2021

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both devices offer robust performance for daily tasks, but their underlying architectures lead to different user experiences.

  • System Responsiveness: The iPhone 13 Pro Max delivers consistently smooth performance across applications and multitasking, a characteristic often praised by users. The Pixel 7 also handles daily tasks and app switching smoothly, with users reporting good performance for general use.
  • Demanding Applications: For more intensive tasks like gaming or video editing, the iPhone 13 Pro Max maintains high performance levels, benefiting from its efficient hardware and software integration. The Pixel 7 is capable of running demanding applications and casual games effectively, though some users have noted it can run warm during extended heavy use.
  • Storage and Battery Behavior: The iPhone 13 Pro Max offers a wider range of storage options, including a 1TB variant, while the Pixel 7 is available with up to 256GB. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is widely recognized for its exceptional battery longevity, often lasting two full days for many users. The Pixel 7 provides a full day of use for most users, though heavy usage may require more frequent charging.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

6 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both smartphones is a highlight, though they employ different display characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a 6.7-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a resolution of 2778 x 1284 pixels, offering sharp and detailed visuals. The Pixel 7 has a slightly smaller 6.3-inch OLED display with a 2400 x 1080 pixel resolution. Both OLED panels provide deep blacks and vibrant colors.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The iPhone 13 Pro Max's display can reach up to 1000 nits typical brightness and 1200 nits peak brightness for HDR content, and features ProMotion technology for an adaptive refresh rate up to 120Hz, resulting in very fluid scrolling and responsiveness. The Pixel 7 offers a peak brightness of 1400 nits and a 90Hz refresh rate, providing a smooth viewing experience for most content.
  • Viewing Experience: The larger screen of the iPhone 13 Pro Max offers a more expansive canvas for media consumption and productivity. The Pixel 7's slightly more compact size may appeal to users preferring easier one-handed operation.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1284 x 2778

Screen type

AMOLED

Super Retina XDR OLED

Audiovisual

Both devices are known for their advanced camera systems, each with a distinct approach to image processing and features.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Google Pixel 7 features a dual-camera setup with a 50 MP main sensor and a 12 MP ultrawide lens. Its strength lies in computational photography, producing natural colors and sharp details, particularly excelling in low-light conditions and portrait mode. The iPhone 13 Pro Max boasts a triple-camera system, including a 12 MP main, 12 MP ultrawide, and a 12 MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. This provides greater versatility for different photographic scenarios, including optical zoom capabilities.
  • Video Recording: Both phones are capable of recording 4K video at 60 frames per second. The iPhone 13 Pro Max includes features like Cinematic mode for shallow depth-of-field video and ProRes video recording, offering more advanced options for videographers.
  • Front Camera and Audio: The Pixel 7 has a 10.8 MP front camera, while the iPhone 13 Pro Max features a 12 MP front camera. Both provide clear audio recording and stereo speakers for media playback, though some Pixel 7 users have noted average speaker quality.

Main camera

50 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

10.8 megapixels

12 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements differentiate these two smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity for fast mobile data. The Pixel 7 includes Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2, and uses a USB-C 3.2 port for charging and data transfer. The iPhone 13 Pro Max supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0, and utilizes Apple's proprietary Lightning port.
  • Biometric Security: The Pixel 7 offers both an under-display optical fingerprint scanner and face unlock for security. User feedback on the Pixel 7's fingerprint scanner has been mixed, with some reporting inconsistent reliability. The iPhone 13 Pro Max relies solely on Face ID for biometric authentication.
  • Physical Characteristics: The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a larger and heavier device, weighing 240 grams with dimensions of 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.7 mm. The Pixel 7 is more compact and lighter at 197 grams and measures 155.6 x 73.2 x 8.7 mm. The iPhone's stainless steel frame contributes to its substantial feel, while the Pixel's aluminum frame offers a slightly lighter build.

Weight

212 oz

238 oz

Screen size (in)

6.3

6.7

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Google Pixel 7 and iPhone 13 Pro Max cater to different user preferences, each excelling in specific areas. Users frequently praise the Pixel 7 for its exceptional camera capabilities, particularly its computational photography, and its clean Android software experience. However, some users have noted inconsistent battery performance for heavy use and mixed experiences with the in-display fingerprint sensor.

The iPhone 13 Pro Max is widely lauded for its outstanding battery life, consistently smooth performance, and high-quality display. Common criticisms include its considerable weight and size, and the continued use of the Lightning port.

Users prioritizing an advanced and versatile camera system with a pure Android experience may find the Google Pixel 7 well-suited to their needs. Those who value industry-leading battery life, a consistently fluid user experience within the iOS ecosystem, and a telephoto camera lens will likely lean towards the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Both devices offer a premium smartphone experience, and choosing between them often comes down to individual priorities regarding operating system, camera features, and device size. For those considering either model, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons