Compare models

Galaxy A35 vs iPhone 17 Pro Max

  • 1-year warranty
  • Free standard shipping
  • Free 30-day returns
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$307.00

Versus A$711.00 new

See options
iPhone 17 Pro Max
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$1,746.00

Versus A$1,749.00 new

See options

Differences at a glance

The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) and the iPhone 17 Pro Max (2025) are modern smartphones designed for very different segments of the mobile market. While the Galaxy A35 focuses on delivering core everyday capabilities within the Android ecosystem, the iPhone 17 Pro Max represents Apple's high-end flagship offering running iOS. These two devices differ substantially in their release timelines, operating systems, engineering approaches, and intended user bases.

Available Models

Colour

Storage (GB)

Scores

Durability

Comparing the structural longevity of these devices reveals differences stemming from their respective release years and software support schedules. Choosing a quality-assured refurbished option [Back Market brand reference 1] can extend the lifecycle of high-end hardware sustainably.

  • Release timeline and support: The iPhone 17 Pro Max benefits from Apple's extended software update schedule spanning many years, whereas the Galaxy A35 follows Samsung's mid-range multi-year support commitment.
  • Build resilience: Both devices feature robust dust and water resistance ratings, though their exterior materials and glass protections reflect different tiers of mobile engineering.
  • Expected lifespan: Hardware durability on both models supports multi-year daily use, with the flagship model retaining processing headroom further into the future.

Release year

2024

2025

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

System responsiveness and daily multitasking capabilities vary significantly based on the internal hardware tiers of each device. Storage configurations and battery optimization shape how long each phone lasts away from a charger during intensive use cases.

  • Multitasking and app handling: The Galaxy A35 handles routine browsing, social media, and moderate streaming smoothly, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max manages demanding professional applications, heavy gaming, and advanced background processes with high thermal efficiency.
  • Battery behavior: Both devices are equipped to comfortably complete a full day of standard mixed usage, though large battery capacities combined with efficient software management dictate endurance during continuous media playback.
  • Storage tiers: The Galaxy A35 accommodates expandable storage via microSD cards, whereas the iPhone 17 Pro Max relies entirely on fixed internal storage configurations scaling up to massive capacities.

Screen quality

Visual output and display technologies differ in size, peak brightness, and fluid motion handling across both device types. Each screen is tuned to provide clear text rendering and vibrant media consumption.

  • Display technology: The Galaxy A35 utilizes a Super AMOLED panel with deep contrast levels, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max features an advanced OLED Super Retina XDR display.
  • Refresh rate and fluidity: Both screens support a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling through web pages and responsive touch interactions.
  • Outdoor visibility: High peak brightness capabilities on both models allow contents and viewfinder elements to remain legible under direct sunlight.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

2868x1320

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super Retina XDR

Audiovisual

The optical hardware and audio reproduction systems cater to distinct levels of multimedia creation and media consumption preferences. Both configurations deliver clear results for casual recording and calls.

  • Camera versatility: The Galaxy A35 provides a triple-lens rear array suited for standard wide shots, ultra-wide landscapes, and macro photography, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max incorporates a high-resolution multi-lens fusion system capable of advanced optical zoom and detailed low-light capture.
  • Video recording: The iPhone model offers professional-grade video formats and stabilization profiles, whereas the Samsung alternative records stable clips suitable for everyday sharing.
  • Audio output: Stereo speaker setups on both devices deliver balanced sound for hands-free calls and casual video streaming.

Main camera

50 megapixels

48 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

18 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Practical everyday elements such as port standards, physical dimensions, and security sensors dictate the ergonomics and connectivity of each handset.

  • Connectivity standards: Both smartphones support modern 5G networks, fast Wi-Fi protocols, and Bluetooth for accessory pairing.
  • Port types: The Galaxy A35 and iPhone 17 Pro Max both utilize universal USB-C ports for charging and wired data transfers.
  • Ergonomics and weight: The Galaxy A35 presents a lighter composite build, whereas the iPhone 17 Pro Max features a heavier, premium metal-and-glass construction that sits larger in the hand.

Weight

209 oz

233 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.9

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

What the community thinks

User feedback and community discussions highlight distinct reasons for choosing either device. Owners of the Galaxy A35 frequently praise its reliable screen quality, dependable daily battery life, and expandable storage capability, making it a sensible pick for straightforward communication and media tasks. Conversely, users of the iPhone 17 Pro Max emphasize its robust processing power, advanced camera flexibility, and long-term software support within the iOS ecosystem.

Users prioritizing straightforward everyday messaging, media streaming, and expandable storage will find the Galaxy A35 well-suited to their needs. Meanwhile, users prioritizing high-end mobile photography, maximum processing headroom, and the iOS environment may lean toward the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Exploring a quality-assured refurbished option [Back Market brand reference 2] can also provide a sustainable choice for acquiring either model. Ultimately, the decision rests on matching device capabilities with personal software preferences and workflow requirements.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons