Galaxy A23 vs Galaxy S10

Galaxy A23
Galaxy A23
See options
Galaxy S10
Galaxy S10
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$359.00

Versus A$849.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A23, released in March 2022, and the Samsung Galaxy S10, launched in March 2019, represent different eras and market segments within Samsung's smartphone lineup. While both operate on the Android platform, the A23 is a more recent mid-range device, focusing on modern essentials like a high refresh rate display and a large battery, whereas the S10 was a premium flagship, offering advanced display technology and a versatile camera system from its time.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy S10 was released in March 2019, making it an older device. The Galaxy A23, launched in March 2022, is significantly newer.
  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy S10 originally shipped with Android 9 and received major OS updates up to Android 12, with security updates concluding around March 2023. This means it no longer receives official software support. In contrast, the Galaxy A23 (4G variant) launched with Android 12 and was eligible for two major Android updates and four years of security updates, extending its practical lifespan further into the future. The A23 5G variant, released later, has received updates up to Android 15.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing ongoing software features and security patches will find the Galaxy A23 offers a longer period of official support. For those considering a refurbished option, the A23 provides a more current software experience and extended security coverage.

Release year

2022

2019

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two devices reflect their original market positioning and age.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy S10, powered by a flagship-tier processor from its release year, was designed for demanding applications and smooth multitasking. It handles everyday tasks, complex games, and heavy applications with responsiveness. The Galaxy A23 features a mid-range processor, which capably manages daily tasks, social media, and moderate gaming.
  • System Responsiveness: The S10 generally offers a more fluid and immediate response across the system, especially when switching between multiple applications or running graphically intensive content. The A23 provides a smooth experience for typical usage, though it may exhibit slight delays with very demanding tasks compared to a former flagship.
  • Storage and RAM: Both devices offer various storage configurations, with the A23 supporting up to 1TB expandable storage via microSD, and the S10 supporting up to 512GB expandable storage. The S10 typically comes with 8GB of RAM, facilitating robust multitasking, while the A23 offers 4GB, 6GB, or 8GB RAM options.

Memory (GB)

4 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display technologies and specifications differ notably between the Galaxy A23 and the Galaxy S10.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy S10 features a 6.1-inch Dynamic AMOLED display with a QHD+ resolution (1440x3040 pixels), offering deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. The Galaxy A23 comes with a 6.6-inch PLS TFT LCD display (or IPS LCD for the 5G variant) with an FHD+ resolution (1080x2408 pixels).
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The A23 (4G variant) offers a 90Hz refresh rate, while the A23 5G variant boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smoother scrolling and a more fluid visual experience compared to the S10's standard 60Hz refresh rate.
  • Brightness and Viewing Experience: The S10's AMOLED panel generally achieves higher peak brightness and better outdoor visibility, along with HDR10+ support for enhanced media consumption. The A23's LCD panel offers good brightness for most conditions, but may not match the S10's contrast and color depth.

Resolution

1080 x 2408

1440 x 3040

Screen type

PLS LCD

Dynamic AMOLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both devices offer distinct capabilities for photography and videography.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy S10 features a triple-lens rear camera setup, including a 12MP main lens with variable aperture and optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12MP telephoto lens with 2x optical zoom and OIS, and a 16MP ultrawide lens. The Galaxy A23 has a quad-camera system, comprising a 50MP main lens with OIS, a 5MP ultrawide, a 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor.
  • Photography Performance: The S10's camera system, a flagship of its time, excels in capturing detailed and vibrant photos in various lighting conditions, including good low-light performance and versatile zoom capabilities. The A23's main 50MP camera performs well in daylight, producing clear images, but its ultrawide and macro lenses are less capable, and low-light performance can be underwhelming without dedicated night mode enhancements.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: The S10 supports 4K video recording at 60 frames per second from its rear cameras and 4K from its 10MP front camera. The A23 records video up to 1080p from its rear cameras and features an 8MP (or 13MP for 5G variant) front camera, suitable for everyday video calls and selfies.

Main camera

50 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

10 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical features and design elements differentiate these two Samsung smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The Galaxy A23 offers 4G connectivity, with a 5G variant also available, and includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and a USB-C port. The Galaxy S10 supports 4G networks, also features a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a USB-C port.
  • Biometric Security: The S10 introduced an ultrasonic in-screen fingerprint reader, a premium feature for its time, offering convenient and secure unlocking. The A23 utilizes a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, which is responsive and easily accessible.
  • Build Materials and Durability: The Galaxy S10 features a more premium construction with a glass front and back (Gorilla Glass 6) and an aluminum frame, along with an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. The Galaxy A23 has a plastic back and frame, offering a sturdy but less premium feel, and lacks an official IP rating for water and dust resistance. The S10 also supports wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the A23.

Weight

195 oz

157 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.1

Network

4G

4G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Galaxy A23 often highlights its impressive battery life, with many reporting up to two days of usage on a single charge, and its smooth display refresh rate as significant advantages. Some common criticisms include its less vibrant LCD display compared to AMOLED panels and its performance, which, while adequate for daily tasks, may not satisfy power users. For the Galaxy S10, users frequently praise its premium design, vibrant AMOLED display, and versatile camera system, which was considered top-tier at its launch. However, its battery life, while generally sufficient for a day, was sometimes noted as not being exceptional compared to some contemporaries, and its software support has now ended.

Users prioritizing extended software support, a large battery for multi-day use, and a high refresh rate display for smooth scrolling may find the Galaxy A23 well-suited to their needs. It is a practical choice for those seeking a reliable device for everyday communication, media consumption, and moderate gaming. Conversely, individuals who value a premium build, a superior display with deeper colors, more advanced camera capabilities including optical zoom, and features like wireless charging, might lean towards the Galaxy S10. While its software support has concluded, its hardware still offers a refined experience for many tasks. Both devices, especially when considering quality-assured refurbished options, provide excellent value and an eco-friendly alternative to purchasing new.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons