Galaxy A23 vs Galaxy A35

Galaxy A23
Galaxy A23
See options
Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
See options

The Samsung Galaxy A23, released in March 2022, and the Samsung Galaxy A35, launched in March 2024, are both Android-based smartphones from Samsung's Galaxy A series. While they share a common operating system and a focus on essential smartphone features, the Galaxy A35 introduces notable advancements in display technology, camera capabilities, and software support, reflecting its newer generation.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is influenced by its release timeline, software support, and physical durability.

  • Release Timeline and OS Support: The Galaxy A23, launched in March 2022, originally shipped with Android 12 and is expected to receive two major Android OS upgrades, potentially reaching Android 14 or 15 for its 5G variant, along with four years of security updates. The Galaxy A35, released in March 2024 with Android 14, benefits from Samsung's updated policy, promising four major OS upgrades (up to Android 18) and five years of security updates, offering a longer period of software relevance.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A35 has a higher repairability score of 8.4 out of 10, indicating improved ease of repair and better availability of spare parts compared to its predecessor. The Galaxy A23 has a repairability score of 6.75 out of 10.
  • Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing extended software support and potentially easier maintenance may find the Galaxy A35 to offer a longer practical lifespan.

Release year

2022

2024

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Evaluating the performance of these devices involves looking at their responsiveness, multitasking capabilities, and how they handle demanding applications.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy A35 features a more recent generation processor, which translates to smoother operation for everyday tasks, faster app loading, and more efficient handling of demanding applications and games. The Galaxy A23, while capable for general use, may exhibit more noticeable delays when switching between multiple applications or running graphically intensive content.
  • RAM and Storage: Both models offer various RAM configurations, typically ranging from 4GB to 8GB, with the Galaxy A35 often starting with higher base RAM options. This can impact multitasking, with higher RAM allowing more applications to remain open in the background without needing to reload. Both devices offer expandable storage via microSD cards, providing flexibility for users who need more space for photos, videos, and apps.
  • Battery Behavior: Both smartphones are equipped with a 5000mAh battery capacity, designed to provide extended usage. User experiences suggest that the Galaxy A35 generally offers reliable battery life, often lasting a full day for many users. The Galaxy A23 also provides substantial battery endurance, though some users have reported faster battery drain under heavy usage or with certain applications. Both support 25W fast charging.

Memory (GB)

4 GB

6 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience is a key differentiator, with both devices offering distinct display characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors, deep blacks, and high contrast. The Galaxy A23 also has a 6.6-inch display, but it uses a TFT LCD panel. While the LCD panel on the A23 offers good clarity with its FHD+ resolution (1080x2408 pixels), the Super AMOLED on the A35 provides a more immersive and visually striking experience.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: Both devices offer a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations. However, the Galaxy A35's Super AMOLED panel generally achieves higher peak brightness levels, making it more comfortable to view in bright outdoor conditions. Some users have noted that the A35's screen can feel slightly dark in certain scenarios, though it remains bright enough for outdoor use.
  • Screen Protection: The Galaxy A35 benefits from Gorilla Glass Victus+ for enhanced screen durability, while the Galaxy A23 uses Gorilla Glass 5.

Resolution

1080 x 2408

1080x2340

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both smartphones cater to different photography and videography needs.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A35 features a triple rear camera setup, including a 50-megapixel main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. The Galaxy A23 comes with a quad-camera setup, also featuring a 50-megapixel main sensor with OIS, a 5-megapixel ultrawide, a 2-megapixel macro, and a 2-megapixel depth sensor. The A35's larger macro sensor can capture more detail.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A35 generally offers improved image processing, leading to better detail and color accuracy, especially in varied lighting conditions. Its main camera is praised for good daylight performance and saturated colors. The Galaxy A23's main camera also performs well in good lighting, with a decent night mode.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: A significant difference lies in video capabilities. The Galaxy A35 supports 4K video recording at 30 frames per second with both its main and front (13-megapixel) cameras, which is less common in its segment. The Galaxy A23's video recording is limited to 1080p, and it features an 8-megapixel front camera. The A35 also offers features like automatic framing for video.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support modern connectivity standards, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. The Galaxy A35 offers 5G connectivity as standard, while the Galaxy A23 has both 4G and 5G variants. Both utilize a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer. The Galaxy A23 retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Galaxy A35.
  • Build Materials and Durability Features: The Galaxy A35 features a glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+) and a plastic frame, along with an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, offering a higher level of protection. The Galaxy A23 has a plastic frame and rear, with Gorilla Glass 5 protecting the display, but it lacks an official IP rating, making it more susceptible to water and dust damage.
  • Dimensions and Handling: The Galaxy A35 measures 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm and weighs 209 grams. The Galaxy A23 is slightly taller and thicker at 165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm and weighs 195 grams. The A35's design includes a slightly raised area for physical buttons, which can aid in tactile recognition.

Weight

195 oz

209 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.6

Network

4G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Galaxy A23 often highlights its large display and decent battery life as positive aspects. However, common criticisms include a sometimes laggy user interface, potential overheating under strenuous use, and the absence of an official IP rating for water and dust resistance. Some users have also noted the basic design and lack of stereo speakers.

For the newer Galaxy A35, users generally appreciate its vibrant AMOLED display, improved camera capabilities, and the promise of extended software updates. Some common points of discussion include the screen brightness feeling a little low in specific situations, and some users experiencing issues with updates or finding the bezels to be noticeable. The 6GB RAM variant might feel less responsive when many applications are open simultaneously.

Users prioritizing a more modern design, a superior display, enhanced camera features, and longer software support will find the Galaxy A35 well-suited to their needs. Its IP67 rating also offers greater peace of mind for daily use. Conversely, users who value the presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and are content with solid, but not cutting-edge, performance and display technology may find the Galaxy A23 to be a practical choice. Both devices offer a pathway to smartphone ownership, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons