Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Oppo Reno10

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
See options
Oppo Reno10
Oppo Reno10
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$297.00

Versus A$783.00 new

See options

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, released in June 2023, and the Oppo Reno10, launched in May/July 2023, represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Razr 40 Ultra is a foldable clamshell device, emphasizing portability and a unique user experience with its large external display. In contrast, the Oppo Reno10 is a traditional slab-style smartphone, focusing on a balanced feature set within a conventional form factor. Both devices operate on the Android platform, offering a range of features tailored to different user preferences.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, several factors contribute to their expected lifespan, including software support and physical resilience.

  • Release Timeline and Software Support: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra was released in June 2023, while the Oppo Reno10 launched around May to July 2023. Motorola has committed to providing three major Android OS upgrades and four years of bi-monthly security updates for the Razr 40 Ultra. The Oppo Reno10 is expected to receive two major Android OS updates and three years of security updates. This means the Razr 40 Ultra generally offers a longer period of official software support.
  • Physical Durability: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a foldable design with a pOLED main display and a large external pOLED screen protected by Gorilla Glass Victus. It has an IP52 rating, indicating splash resistance. User reports suggest the inner display and hinge can hold up well over time with careful use, though the external screen has shown some vulnerability in stress tests. The Oppo Reno10 features a glass front and back with a plastic frame, and its display is protected by AGC Dragontrail Glass. It does not have an official IP rating.
  • Repairability: The Oppo Reno10 has a repairability score of 7.5 out of 10, with accessible battery and pull tabs for removal, though adhesive is used for the back cover and battery. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, being a foldable device, presents more challenges for repair, with a lower repairability score for its predecessor, indicating a more complex internal structure.

Release year

2023

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

Yes

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is largely determined by its internal components, impacting how smoothly applications run and how efficiently it handles demanding tasks.

  • Processing Power: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is equipped with a processor designed for high-end performance, allowing it to handle demanding applications and multitasking with responsiveness. Users generally report a fluid Android experience. The Oppo Reno10 utilizes a mid-range processor, which provides capable performance for everyday tasks and casual gaming, though it may not match the raw power of higher-tier chipsets for intensive applications.
  • Storage and RAM: The Razr 40 Ultra is available with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and storage options of 256GB or 512GB. The Oppo Reno10 typically comes with 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, with some regions offering 12GB RAM and 512GB storage. Both offer sufficient memory for smooth multitasking and app management, with the Razr 40 Ultra providing higher maximum configurations.
  • Battery Behavior: The Razr 40 Ultra has a 3800mAh battery, which users report can last through a full day of moderate use, especially when leveraging its external display to reduce main screen usage. It supports 30W wired and 5W wireless charging. The Oppo Reno10 features a larger 5000mAh battery, offering extended usage times, with some users reporting up to two days of use. It supports 67W or 80W fast wired charging, allowing for quick recharges.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on a smartphone is significantly influenced by its display technology, resolution, and refresh rate.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a 6.9-inch foldable pOLED main display and a prominent 3.6-inch pOLED external display. The external screen is highly functional, allowing for app usage and notifications without unfolding the device. The Oppo Reno10 has a 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a curved design.
  • Resolution and Clarity: The Razr 40 Ultra's main display offers a resolution of 2640x1080 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of 413ppi, providing clear and detailed visuals. Its external display also maintains high clarity with a resolution of 1056x1066 pixels and 413ppi. The Oppo Reno10 features a 1080x2412 pixel resolution (FHD+) on its 6.7-inch screen, with a pixel density of 394ppi, ensuring crisp image quality.
  • Refresh Rate and Brightness: The Razr 40 Ultra's main display boasts a high refresh rate of up to 165Hz, with the external display also offering up to 144Hz, contributing to very smooth scrolling and responsiveness. It can reach a peak brightness of 1400 nits. The Oppo Reno10 provides a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth visual experience. Its display can reach 950 nits of brightness.

Resolution

1080 x 2640

1080x2412

Audiovisual

Camera capabilities are a key consideration for many users, encompassing the quality of photos, videos, and overall imaging features.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a dual rear camera setup, including a 12MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a 13MP ultrawide sensor that can also function for macro photography. The Oppo Reno10 offers a triple rear camera system, comprising a 64MP main sensor, a 32MP telephoto lens with 2x optical zoom, and an 8MP ultrawide lens. The Reno10's telephoto lens is a notable feature for portrait photography and zoomed shots.
  • Photography Performance: The Razr 40 Ultra can capture good photos in well-lit conditions, with its main camera performing reasonably well, though it may struggle with motion and its ultrawide is a step down in quality. The Oppo Reno10's main and telephoto cameras deliver strong results in daylight, with good detail and natural colors, and it performs well in night mode. However, its ultrawide camera is less impressive.
  • Video Recording and Selfie Cameras: Both devices support 4K video recording at 30fps, with the Razr 40 Ultra also capable of 4K at 60fps. The Razr 40 Ultra has a 32MP front-facing camera. The Reno10 also has a 32MP selfie camera, which users report produces sharp images. The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design allows for unique vlogging and hands-free video call opportunities using its external display and main cameras.

Front camera

32 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, practical elements like connectivity, ports, and physical design contribute to the overall user experience.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6 (or 6E for Razr 40 Ultra), Bluetooth 5.3, and NFC. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra uses a USB-C port (USB 2.0). The Oppo Reno10 also features a USB Type-C 2.0 port. Neither device includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Sensors and Biometrics: Both phones include a fingerprint sensor for secure authentication. The Razr 40 Ultra has a side-mounted fingerprint reader, along with face unlock. The Oppo Reno10 features an in-display optical fingerprint sensor and supports face unlock.
  • Design and Handling: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, as a foldable, has distinct dimensions: 170.83 x 73.95 x 6.99mm when open and 88.42 x 73.95 x 15.1mm when folded, weighing around 188g. It uses Corning Gorilla Glass Victus and a 7000 series aluminum frame, with some variants featuring vegan leather. The Oppo Reno10 measures 162.29 x 74.05 x 7.99mm and weighs 185g, featuring a glass front and back with a plastic frame. The Razr 40 Ultra's compact folded form factor offers enhanced portability, while the Reno10 provides a more conventional, slim profile.

Weight

1 oz

185 oz

Screen size (in)

6.9

6.7

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Oppo Reno10 cater to different user priorities, each excelling in specific areas based on their design philosophy and feature sets.

Users frequently praise the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra for its innovative foldable design and the utility of its large external display, which allows for quick interactions and unique camera angles. Its smooth performance and high refresh rate displays are also commonly highlighted. Criticisms sometimes point to its battery capacity, which, while improved for a foldable, is smaller than many traditional smartphones, and its camera performance, while capable, may not always match the best non-folding flagships.

The Oppo Reno10 receives positive feedback for its strong battery life and fast charging capabilities, making it a reliable device for extended use. Its camera system, particularly the telephoto lens, is often lauded for delivering good quality photos, especially portraits. Some users note that its overall performance, while sufficient for most tasks, might not be as robust as devices with higher-tier processors, and the ultrawide camera could be improved.

Users prioritizing a compact, innovative form factor with a highly functional external screen and a fluid user interface may find the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra well-suited to their needs. Its unique design offers a distinct experience for those who value portability and a fresh interaction method. Conversely, individuals who prioritize extended battery life, rapid charging, and a versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens in a traditional smartphone design will likely lean towards the Oppo Reno10. It offers a dependable and balanced experience for everyday use.

For those considering either device, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative, allowing access to these technologies while supporting sustainable consumption.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons