Galaxy A35 vs Nokia G22

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
See options
Nokia G22
Nokia G22
See options

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Nokia G22 are both Android smartphones, released in March 2024 and February 2023, respectively. While the Galaxy A35 offers a more advanced display and stronger performance, the Nokia G22 distinguishes itself with a focus on user repairability and extended battery life.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of a smartphone, factors like software support, physical resilience, and ease of repair play a significant role.

  • Software Longevity: The Samsung Galaxy A35, launched with Android 14, is slated to receive four major OS upgrades, extending its software support up to Android 18, along with five years of security updates until 2029. In contrast, the Nokia G22, which launched with Android 12, has received updates up to Android 14, but its software support window has officially closed, with security updates expected through April 2026.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A35 features a Gorilla Glass Victus+ front and a glass back, offering enhanced protection against drops and scratches, complemented by an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. The Nokia G22 uses Gorilla Glass 3 on the front and a plastic back made from recycled materials, with an IP52 rating for splash and dust resistance.
  • Repairability Focus: The Nokia G22 is designed with user repairability in mind, featuring a QuickFix design and a partnership with iFixit that provides access to parts and repair guides, making common fixes like battery or screen replacement more accessible for users. The Galaxy A35 follows a more traditional smartphone construction.

Release year

2024

2023

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The overall responsiveness and capability of a smartphone are largely determined by its internal components, impacting how smoothly applications run and how efficiently tasks are handled.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A35 delivers a more fluid user experience, handling demanding applications and multitasking with greater ease due to its more capable processor. The Nokia G22 is well-suited for everyday tasks and lighter use, though it may exhibit some delays when opening more intensive applications or managing numerous processes simultaneously.
  • Multitasking Efficiency: With typical configurations offering 6GB or 8GB of RAM, the Galaxy A35 is better equipped to manage multiple applications running in the background without significant slowdowns. The Nokia G22, commonly available with 4GB or 6GB of RAM, performs adequately for general use but may require more frequent app closures for optimal performance during heavy multitasking.
  • Battery Endurance: Both devices are equipped with large batteries, around 5000mAh, providing substantial power for daily use. Users of the Galaxy A35 often report achieving 1.5 to 2 days of use on a single charge with moderate activity. The Nokia G22 also offers multi-day battery life, benefiting from its efficient processor and lighter software interface.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and its quality significantly influences the viewing and user experience.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy A35 features a Super AMOLED display, known for its deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. It offers a Full HD+ resolution of 2340x1080 pixels, resulting in sharp and detailed visuals. The Nokia G22 utilizes an IPS LCD panel, which provides good color reproduction and viewing angles, with an HD+ resolution of 1600x720 pixels.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: The Galaxy A35 boasts a higher peak brightness of 1000 nits, ensuring better visibility in bright outdoor conditions. It also features a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more responsive feel. The Nokia G22 offers a typical brightness of 500 nits and a 90Hz refresh rate, providing a reasonably smooth experience for everyday interactions.
  • Screen Size: The Galaxy A35 has a 6.6-inch display, while the Nokia G22 has a 6.5-inch display. Both offer a large viewing area suitable for media consumption and general use.

Resolution

1080x2340

720 x 1600

Audiovisual

For many users, the camera system is a crucial component, influencing how they capture and share moments.

  • Rear Camera Capabilities: Both smartphones feature a 50-megapixel main camera. The Galaxy A35 enhances its main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. The Nokia G22 includes a 2-megapixel macro lens and a 2-megapixel depth sensor alongside its main camera.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A35's main camera captures detailed images with natural colors in good lighting and performs competently in low-light conditions. Its ultrawide camera is functional, though the macro camera is best used in ample light. The Nokia G22's main camera delivers acceptable results in well-lit environments but tends to struggle with detail and noise in lower light.
  • Video and Selfie Cameras: The Galaxy A35 supports 4K video recording at 30 frames per second with both its rear and 13-megapixel front cameras, offering sharp video quality. The Nokia G22 records video at 1080p at 30 frames per second and features an 8-megapixel front camera, suitable for standard video calls and selfies.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience and device utility.

  • Connectivity Standards: The Galaxy A35 supports 5G connectivity, along with Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, offering faster network speeds and more efficient wireless connections. The Nokia G22 is a 4G device, featuring Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0.
  • Physical Design and Handling: The Galaxy A35 weighs approximately 209 grams, while the Nokia G22 is slightly lighter at around 195 grams. Both devices feature a USB-C 2.0 port for charging and data transfer. The Nokia G22 also retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which may be a consideration for users who prefer wired audio accessories.
  • Security Features: For biometric authentication, the Galaxy A35 incorporates an optical fingerprint sensor integrated into the display, providing a seamless unlocking experience. The Nokia G22 features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, which is often quick and responsive. Both devices also offer face recognition capabilities.

Weight

209 oz

196 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.5

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback indicates that the Samsung Galaxy A35 is often praised for its vibrant display, reliable battery life, and capable main camera, making it a strong contender for users who prioritize media consumption and photography. Some users note that while its overall performance is solid, the ultrawide and macro cameras may not always meet higher expectations.

The Nokia G22 receives positive remarks for its exceptional battery longevity and its unique emphasis on user repairability, which appeals to those seeking a device with a longer physical lifespan. However, common criticisms point to its more modest performance for demanding tasks and its camera system, which is generally considered adequate in good lighting but less impressive in challenging conditions.

Users prioritizing a modern display, smoother performance for a wider range of applications, and a longer software support window may find the Galaxy A35 better suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who value the ability to perform basic repairs themselves, desire multi-day battery life, and primarily use their smartphone for essential tasks will likely appreciate the Nokia G22. Both devices offer distinct advantages, catering to different user priorities. For those considering a sustainable choice, exploring quality-assured refurbished options for either model can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons