iPhone 13 mini vs iPhone SE (2016)

iPhone 13 mini
iPhone 13 mini
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$389.00

Versus A$1,049.00 new

See options
iPhone SE (2016)
iPhone SE (2016)
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$109.84

Versus A$219.00 new

See options

Ratings

The iPhone 13 Mini (released in September 2021) and the iPhone SE 2016 (released in March 2016) represent distinct eras of Apple's compact smartphone offerings. While both devices cater to users preferring a smaller form factor, the iPhone 13 Mini offers a modern, all-screen design with advanced internal components, whereas the iPhone SE 2016 retains a classic design with hardware that was considered powerful for its time. Both operate on Apple's iOS platform, providing a consistent user experience across generations.

Scores

Durability

The practical lifespan of a smartphone is influenced by its release timeline, software support, and physical durability.

  • Release Timeline and Software Support: The iPhone 13 Mini, launched in late 2021, benefits from a significantly longer expected software support window compared to the iPhone SE 2016, which was released in early 2016. As of early 2026, the iPhone 13 Mini is compatible with iOS 18, while the iPhone SE 2016's software support officially ended with iOS 15.8.7 in March 2026. This difference means the 13 Mini will receive critical security updates and new features for several more years.
  • Physical Durability: The iPhone 13 Mini features a Ceramic Shield front cover and an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance, allowing it to withstand submersion up to 6 meters for 30 minutes. The iPhone SE 2016, by contrast, has no official water resistance rating and uses an older glass and aluminum construction.
  • Repairability: The iPhone 13 Mini initially received a lower repairability score due to complexities with component pairing, but an iOS update improved its score to 6 out of 10, making certain repairs more feasible. Information on the repairability of the iPhone SE 2016 is less detailed, but older iPhone models generally present challenges for independent repair.

Release year

2021

2016

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Operating system

iOS

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance differences between these two models are substantial, reflecting over five years of technological advancement in mobile processing.

  • Processing Power: The iPhone 13 Mini is equipped with a significantly more advanced processor, offering substantial improvements in CPU and GPU performance. This translates to smoother operation for demanding applications, faster app loading times, and a more fluid experience with modern games and multitasking. The iPhone SE 2016, while powerful for its release year, handles everyday tasks adequately but may show limitations with newer, resource-intensive apps.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: The iPhone 13 Mini features 4GB of RAM, providing ample capacity for running multiple applications simultaneously and switching between them without noticeable slowdowns. The iPhone SE 2016 comes with 2GB of RAM, which was sufficient for its time but can lead to more frequent app reloads and slower transitions when juggling several tasks.
  • Storage Options: The iPhone 13 Mini starts with 128GB of internal storage, with options extending to 256GB and 512GB, providing generous space for apps, photos, and videos. The iPhone SE 2016 offered storage options from 16GB up to 128GB, which can be restrictive for users with large media libraries or numerous applications.
  • Battery Behavior: The iPhone 13 Mini features a 2406 mAh battery, which, combined with its efficient processor and OLED display, generally provides a full day of use for many users. The iPhone SE 2016 has a 1624 mAh battery. While it was noted for good battery life for its size at launch due to its smaller screen and efficient chip, it will require more frequent charging under modern usage patterns.

Memory

4 GB

2 GB

Screen quality

The display technology and viewing experience differ significantly between these two compact iPhones.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The iPhone 13 Mini boasts a 5.4-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels and a pixel density of 476 ppi. This OLED technology delivers deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. The iPhone SE 2016 features a 4.0-inch Retina IPS LCD display with a resolution of 1136x640 pixels and a pixel density of 326 ppi. While sharp for its size, the LCD technology cannot match the contrast and color richness of OLED.
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The iPhone 13 Mini offers a typical brightness of 800 nits and a peak HDR brightness of 1200 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions and a superior HDR viewing experience. The iPhone SE 2016 has a maximum typical brightness of 500 nits, which is adequate for indoor use but can be less visible under direct sunlight.
  • Screen Size and Design: The iPhone 13 Mini features an all-screen design with a 5.4-inch display, maximizing screen real estate within its compact body. The iPhone SE 2016 retains the classic iPhone design with a 4.0-inch display and prominent bezels, including a physical home button with Touch ID. Users prioritizing a larger viewing area in a small device will find the 13 Mini more appealing.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

640 x 1136

Screen type

Super Retina XDR OLED

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

Camera capabilities have seen substantial advancements between these two models, impacting both still photography and video recording.

  • Rear Camera System: The iPhone 13 Mini features a dual 12MP camera system, including a wide lens with sensor-shift optical image stabilization (OIS) and an ultra-wide lens with a 120-degree field of view. This system excels in low-light performance, captures more detail, and offers advanced computational photography features like Night mode, Deep Fusion, and Smart HDR 4. The iPhone SE 2016 has a single 12MP iSight camera with a smaller aperture and lacks OIS, resulting in less capable low-light performance and fewer advanced features.
  • Video Recording Quality: The iPhone 13 Mini supports HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 frames per second and introduces Cinematic mode for a shallow depth of field effect in videos. It also offers improved video stabilization. The iPhone SE 2016 can record 4K video at 30 frames per second and 1080p at 60 frames per second but lacks the advanced HDR capabilities, cinematic features, and superior stabilization of the 13 Mini.
  • Front Camera: The iPhone 13 Mini is equipped with a 12MP TrueDepth front camera that supports Portrait mode, Night mode, Deep Fusion, and 4K video recording. The iPhone SE 2016 has a 1.2MP FaceTime HD front camera, which is suitable for basic video calls but offers significantly lower resolution and fewer features for selfies and video compared to the 13 Mini.

Main camera

12 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

12 megapixels

1.2 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical elements differentiate these two compact devices.

  • Connectivity: The iPhone 13 Mini supports 5G cellular networks, Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Bluetooth 5.0, offering faster wireless speeds and improved network performance. The iPhone SE 2016 supports 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 802.11ac, and Bluetooth 4.2, which are older standards resulting in slower data transfer rates and potentially less stable connections in congested environments.
  • Ports and Biometrics: Both devices use a Lightning port for charging and data transfer. However, the iPhone SE 2016 includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the iPhone 13 Mini. For security, the iPhone 13 Mini utilizes Face ID for facial recognition, while the iPhone SE 2016 relies on Touch ID, an integrated fingerprint sensor in its home button.
  • Dimensions and Build Materials: The iPhone 13 Mini measures 131.5 x 64.2 x 7.65 mm and weighs 141 grams, featuring an aluminum frame with glass front and back (Ceramic Shield on the front). The iPhone SE 2016 is slightly smaller and lighter at 123.8 x 58.6 x 7.6 mm and 113 grams, with an aluminum frame and glass front and back. The 13 Mini's design allows for a larger screen in a comparable footprint.

Weight

140 oz

113 oz

Screen size (in)

5,4

4

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

Lightning

Lightning

User feedback for the iPhone 13 Mini frequently highlights its appeal as a powerful, modern smartphone in a genuinely compact form factor. Many users praise its vibrant OLED display, advanced camera system with features like Cinematic mode and Night mode, and robust performance for daily tasks and gaming. Common criticisms often revolve around its battery life, which, while improved over previous mini models, may still require a midday charge for heavy users compared to larger phones. Some users also express a preference for the larger screen sizes available in other iPhone models.

The iPhone SE 2016, on the other hand, was widely appreciated for bringing flagship-level performance (at the time of its release) into a beloved, classic iPhone design. Users often lauded its comfortable one-handed use, solid camera for its era, and impressive battery life relative to its small screen and processor efficiency. Criticisms typically focused on its dated design with thick bezels and a lower-resolution front camera compared to contemporary flagships.

Users prioritizing a modern, edge-to-edge display, advanced camera capabilities, and long-term software support will find the iPhone 13 Mini well-suited to their needs. Its superior processing power and 5G connectivity make it a more future-proof option for demanding applications and faster data speeds. Conversely, users who prefer the traditional iPhone design with a physical home button, a very small and lightweight device, and who have more basic smartphone usage requirements might lean towards the iPhone SE 2016. This device remains a functional option for essential communication and light app use, especially as a quality-assured refurbished option, offering a sustainable choice for those seeking a classic experience.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons