Google Pixel 8a vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Google Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$464.00

Versus A$938.69 new

See options
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
See options

The Google Pixel 8a, released in May 2024, and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, launched in June 2023, represent distinct approaches to modern smartphones. The Pixel 8a offers a traditional slab design with a strong focus on software experience and computational photography, while the Razr 40 Ultra stands out with its foldable clamshell form factor and a large, highly functional external display. Both devices run on the Android operating system, but they differ significantly in their hardware philosophies and user interaction.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Software Longevity: The Google Pixel 8a offers an extensive software support period, with Google committing to seven years of OS updates from its May 2024 release. This means users can expect updates until at least 2031. In contrast, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, released in June 2023, is slated to receive three major Android OS upgrades and four years of bi-monthly security updates, with support ending around Android 16 (June 2027).
  • Physical Durability: The Pixel 8a features an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating it can withstand submersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes, and has a scratch-resistant display with Corning Gorilla Glass 3. The Razr 40 Ultra has an IP52 rating, offering protection against dust and splashes of water, but it is not designed for submersion. Its main foldable screen uses ultra-thin glass beneath a protective layer, while the external display is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus.
  • Practical Lifespan: The Pixel 8a's extended software support suggests a longer practical lifespan for users who prioritize having the latest Android features and security patches. The Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design introduces a mechanical element that, while tested for durability, may present different long-term considerations compared to a rigid smartphone.

Release year

2024

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance of both smartphones is driven by capable processors, offering smooth experiences for daily tasks, though their underlying architectures differ.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel 8a is equipped with an advanced processor designed by Google, which handles demanding applications and multitasking efficiently. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a powerful processor from a prominent chipmaker, providing robust performance for gaming and intensive applications.
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices offer 8GB of RAM, ensuring smooth transitions between apps and efficient multitasking. The Pixel 8a is available with 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, while the Razr 40 Ultra offers 256GB or 512GB options, providing more space for media and applications.
  • Battery Behavior: The Pixel 8a houses a 4492 mAh battery, generally providing a full day of use for most users. The Razr 40 Ultra has a 3800 mAh battery, which, combined with its dual-screen setup, may require more frequent charging for heavy users, though it supports both wired and wireless charging.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a significant differentiator, with the Pixel 8a offering a traditional high-quality screen and the Razr 40 Ultra featuring a unique foldable design with two displays.

  • Main Display Technology: The Pixel 8a features a 6.1-inch OLED display with a resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Razr 40 Ultra's main display is a larger 6.9-inch foldable pOLED panel with a resolution of 2640 x 1080 pixels, providing an expansive viewing area when unfolded.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Pixel 8a's display can reach a peak brightness of 2000 nits (1400 nits HDR) and has a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and responsiveness. The Razr 40 Ultra's main screen boasts a 165Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 1400 nits, while its external display offers a 144Hz refresh rate and 1100 nits brightness.
  • Unique External Display: A key feature of the Razr 40 Ultra is its 3.6-inch external pOLED display, which is highly functional, allowing users to interact with apps, view notifications, and take selfies without opening the phone. The Pixel 8a does not have a secondary display.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1080 x 2640

Screen type

OLED

Foldable LTPO AMOLED

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, but they approach photography with different hardware and software priorities.

  • Rear Camera System: The Google Pixel 8a features a dual-camera setup with a 64MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a 13MP ultrawide lens. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra also has a dual rear camera system, consisting of a 12MP main sensor with OIS and a 13MP ultrawide lens.
  • Front Camera and Video: For selfies and video calls, the Pixel 8a includes a 13MP front camera. The Razr 40 Ultra offers a higher resolution 32MP front camera, and its foldable design allows for using the main rear cameras for high-quality selfies via the external display. Both devices are capable of recording 4K video.
  • Photography Experience: The Pixel 8a leverages Google's computational photography for consistent image quality across various conditions, including low light. The Razr 40 Ultra provides flexibility with its external screen for creative shooting angles and high-quality selfies using the main camera.

Main camera

64 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

32 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.3 for modern wireless communication. They both utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, and neither includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: The Pixel 8a incorporates an in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking, alongside face unlock capabilities. The Razr 40 Ultra features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button, also offering face unlock.
  • Design and Handling: The Pixel 8a has a compact, traditional smartphone form factor, measuring 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm and weighing 188g. The Razr 40 Ultra, when unfolded, is taller and thinner at 170.8 x 73.95 x 6.99 mm, and folds down to a compact 88.42 x 73.95 x 15.1 mm, weighing 188.5g. Its foldable nature allows for a smaller footprint when carried in a pocket or bag.

Weight

188 oz

1 oz

Screen size (in)

6.1

6.9

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Google Pixel 8a and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra cater to different user preferences, each excelling in distinct areas. User feedback for the Pixel 8a often praises its consistent camera performance, long-term software support, and smooth overall user experience, particularly highlighting its AI-powered features. Some common criticisms may include its design being less innovative compared to flagships or its charging speed.

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is frequently lauded for its unique foldable design and the versatility of its large external display, which allows for quick interactions without opening the device. Users appreciate its compact form factor when folded. However, some feedback points to its battery life potentially being shorter for heavy use and its camera performance, while capable, not always matching the top-tier traditional smartphones.

Users prioritizing extended software updates, a reliable camera for everyday photography, and a straightforward smartphone experience may find the Google Pixel 8a well-suited to their needs. Its commitment to seven years of updates provides significant longevity. Conversely, users who value a distinctive design, a highly functional external screen, and a compact form factor when not in use may lean towards the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. Its foldable nature offers a different interaction paradigm.

Both devices offer compelling features, and choosing between them often comes down to whether a traditional, long-supported software experience or an innovative, compact foldable design is more important for daily use. For those seeking an eco-friendly alternative, both models are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing a sustainable choice for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons