Google Pixel 6a vs Nokia X30

Google Pixel 6a
Google Pixel 6a
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$236.00

Versus A$569.00 new

See options
Nokia X30
Nokia X30
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$298.00

Versus A$965.00 new

See options

The Google Pixel 6A, released in July 2022, and the Nokia X30, launched in September 2022, are both Android smartphones designed to offer a balanced user experience. While both devices operate on the Android platform, they present distinct approaches to hardware and software integration. The Pixel 6A emphasizes Google's proprietary processing and computational photography, whereas the Nokia X30 highlights its display technology and commitment to sustainable materials. For consumers considering an eco-friendly alternative, quality-assured refurbished options for both models are available.

Scores

Durability

When evaluating the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key considerations.

  • Software Updates: The Google Pixel 6A was released with Android 12 and is expected to receive OS updates until at least July 2025, with security updates extending until at least July 2027. Some sources indicate an extended policy providing five years of both OS and security updates from its launch, pushing support to July 2027. [4, 7, 32, 33] The Nokia X30 also launched with Android 12 and was promised three OS upgrades and three years of monthly security updates. It has received updates up to Android 14, with Android 15 expected to be its final major OS upgrade, though some reports suggest this might not materialize. [18, 20, 25, 26, 30, 40, 41]
  • Repairability and Build: The Pixel 6A has a repairability score of 7 out of 10, indicating it is relatively easy to repair, with components like the battery being accessible. [3, 5, 8, 11, 21] Its construction includes a plastic back, an aluminum frame, and Gorilla Glass 3 on the front. [3, 6, 14, 24, 27] The Nokia X30 features a frame made from 100% recycled aluminum and a back cover of 65% recycled plastic, contributing to its environmental profile. [13, 20, 26] Both devices carry an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, offering protection against immersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes. [6, 17, 23]
  • Practical Lifespan: Given their respective update policies, the Pixel 6A is likely to offer a slightly longer period of guaranteed software and security support, which can translate to a more extended practical lifespan for users who prioritize the latest Android versions and security patches. The Nokia X30's use of recycled materials may appeal to users prioritizing environmental impact.

Release year

2022

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is largely determined by its internal components and how they handle daily tasks and demanding applications.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel 6A is equipped with Google's Tensor processor, which is designed to handle demanding applications and multitasking smoothly, offering a responsive user experience. [2, 6, 14, 27] The Nokia X30 utilizes a current-generation processor that provides reliable performance for everyday use and 5G connectivity. [1, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 23, 26, 28]
  • Memory and Storage: Both devices come with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage in their base configurations. The Nokia X30 also offers an 8GB RAM and 256GB storage variant. Neither device supports expandable storage via a microSD card. [2, 6, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 26, 27, 42]
  • Battery Performance: The Pixel 6A houses a 4410 mAh battery, which typically provides a full day of use for moderate users, though heavy usage might require an evening top-up. [6, 22, 31, 35, 36] It supports 18W fast charging. [27, 36] The Nokia X30 features a 4200 mAh battery with 33W fast charging support, and is advertised to offer up to two days of battery life under typical usage conditions. [1, 9, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23, 26, 42]

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both devices offer distinct viewing experiences.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Google Pixel 6A features a 6.1-inch OLED display, known for its deep blacks and vibrant colors. [2, 6, 14, 27] The Nokia X30 comes with a slightly larger 6.43-inch AMOLED display, also delivering rich colors and good contrast. [1, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26]
  • Resolution and Refresh Rate: Both phones offer Full HD+ resolution (2400x1080 pixels for Pixel 6A, 1080x2400 pixels for Nokia X30), resulting in clear and sharp visuals. [2, 6, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26, 27] A key difference lies in the refresh rate: the Pixel 6A has a standard 60Hz refresh rate, while the Nokia X30 offers a smoother 90Hz refresh rate, which can make scrolling and animations appear more fluid. [2, 6, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26, 27]
  • Brightness and Protection: The Nokia X30's display can reach a peak brightness of 700 nits, which aids visibility in bright outdoor conditions. [1, 12, 18, 20, 26] The Pixel 6A's OLED display also gets bright enough for comfortable outdoor viewing. [31] The Pixel 6A is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3, while the Nokia X30 features the more durable Corning Gorilla Glass Victus. [2, 6, 18, 20, 23, 26]

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1080 x 2400

Screen type

OLED

AMOLED

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, leveraging their respective hardware and software for photography and videography.

  • Rear Camera System: The Google Pixel 6A features a dual-camera setup with a 12.2MP main sensor (f/1.7 with OIS) and a 12MP ultrawide sensor (f/2.2). [2, 6, 14, 34] The Nokia X30 also has a dual-camera system, comprising a 50MP main sensor (f/1.9 with OIS) and a 13MP ultrawide sensor (f/2.4). [1, 9, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23, 26, 37, 42]
  • Photography Features: The Pixel 6A is known for its strong computational photography, including features like Magic Eraser, Night Sight for low-light conditions, and Real Tone for accurate skin representation. [2, 6, 31, 34, 39] Users generally praise its ability to produce crisp and vibrant still photos. [31, 34, 39] The Nokia X30 also includes features like Night Mode 2.0, Dark Vision, and Tripod Mode to enhance low-light performance. [18, 26]
  • Video and Front Camera: The Pixel 6A can record 4K video at up to 60 frames per second and has an 8MP front-facing camera. [2, 6, 14, 34] The Nokia X30 records video at 1080p at 30 frames per second and is equipped with a 16MP front camera. [1, 9, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23, 26, 37, 42] For audio, the Nokia X30 includes OZO Spatial Audio capture with wind noise reduction. [18]

Main camera

12.2 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

16 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity, ensuring access to faster mobile networks. The Pixel 6A supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2, while the Nokia X30 supports Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax-ready (dual-band) and Bluetooth 5.1. [2, 6, 9, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 26, 27, 28, 42] Both utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, though the Pixel 6A's is USB 3.1 Gen 1 and the Nokia X30's is USB 2.0. [16, 17, 18, 27, 28, 42] Neither phone includes a 3.5mm headphone jack. [16, 18, 27]
  • Biometrics and Sensors: Both the Pixel 6A and Nokia X30 feature an in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. [6, 9, 13, 16, 17, 19, 23, 26, 27, 28, 31] The Nokia X30 also offers facial recognition. [16] Both include NFC for contactless payments. [2, 6, 9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 26, 27, 28, 42]
  • Design and Handling: The Pixel 6A measures 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm and weighs 178 grams, offering a compact and manageable form factor. [2, 14, 24, 27, 29] The Nokia X30 is slightly larger and heavier at 158.9 x 73.9 x 7.99 mm and 185 grams. [1, 9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 26, 28, 37] The Pixel 6A has a plastic back and aluminum frame, while the Nokia X30 uses a glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), a recycled aluminum frame, and a recycled plastic back. [3, 6, 13, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 37]

Weight

250 oz

185 oz

Screen size (in)

6.1

6.43

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Google Pixel 6A and Nokia X30 both present compelling options in the Android smartphone market, each with distinct strengths that cater to different user priorities. User sentiment for the Pixel 6A often praises its exceptional camera capabilities, particularly its computational photography features that deliver high-quality still images, even with its hardware. [31, 34, 39] Its consistent software experience and the performance of its custom processor are also frequently highlighted. [36, 39] Some common criticisms include its 60Hz display, which might feel less fluid compared to higher refresh rate screens, and the absence of wireless charging. [31, 36]

The Nokia X30 is often lauded for its vibrant 90Hz AMOLED display, offering a smoother visual experience. [12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, 26] Its commitment to sustainable materials, with a recycled aluminum frame and plastic back, resonates with environmentally conscious users. [13, 20, 26] While its camera system is capable, some users might find its overall image processing to be less distinctive than the Pixel's. Concerns have also been raised regarding the consistency of its promised software update timeline. [40]

Users prioritizing a powerful camera for still photography, a compact design, and a consistent software experience with Google's unique features may find the Pixel 6A well-suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value a smoother display, a larger screen, faster charging, and a device built with recycled materials might lean towards the Nokia X30. Both devices offer robust dust and water resistance, making them durable choices for everyday use. For those seeking a reliable and sustainable choice, exploring quality-assured refurbished versions of either model can be a practical option.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons