Galaxy Z Fold4 vs iPhone 16e

Galaxy Z Fold4
Galaxy Z Fold4
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$734.00

Versus A$3,628.00 new

See options
iPhone 16e
iPhone 16e
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$838.00

Versus A$999.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, released in August 2022, offers a unique foldable smartphone experience, transforming from a compact device into a larger tablet-like display. In contrast, the hypothetical iPhone 16E, anticipated for a 2026 release, is expected to maintain a traditional slab form factor, focusing on a streamlined iOS experience. The distinction lies in their design philosophy: the Z Fold4 prioritizes screen real estate and multitasking flexibility, while the iPhone 16E emphasizes a conventional, user-centric smartphone design.

Scores

Durability

The durability of these devices reflects their distinct designs and release timelines. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4, released in August 2022, features an Armor Aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass Victus+ on its cover screen, with an Ultra Thin Glass main display. It offers IPX8 water resistance, but lacks official dust resistance. Samsung committed to 4 Android OS upgrades and 5 years of security updates, extending support until 2027. User feedback sometimes notes inner screen protector issues and the visible crease.

  • Software Longevity: The Z Fold4 receives Android updates until Android 16 and security patches until 2027. The iPhone 16E, a 2026 model, would typically receive 6-7 years of major iOS updates.
  • Physical Protection: The Z Fold4 provides IPX8 water resistance. The iPhone 16E is expected to include IP68 water and dust resistance.

Release year

2022

2025

Operating system

Android

iOS

Foldable

Yes

No

Performance

Performance varies significantly due to the different architectures and release years of these devices.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy Z Fold4, with its 2022-era processor and 12GB of RAM, handles demanding applications and multitasking smoothly. The iPhone 16E, a 2026 device, is expected to feature a current-generation Apple A-series chip, providing exceptional performance for complex tasks and advanced gaming.
  • Multitasking: The Z Fold4 excels on its large foldable screen, allowing multiple apps simultaneously. The iPhone 16E offers powerful multitasking within its traditional form factor.
  • Storage & Battery: The Z Fold4 offers storage up to 1TB. Its 4400 mAh battery provides a full day of moderate use, with heavy inner display use impacting longevity. The iPhone 16E is anticipated to offer various storage options and all-day battery life.

Memory (GB)

12 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The screen quality and experience are major differentiators between these two devices, primarily due to their form factors.

  • Display Technology, Size & Resolution: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features two Dynamic AMOLED 2X displays: a 7.6-inch foldable inner screen (2176 x 1812 pixels) and a 6.2-inch cover screen (2316 x 904 pixels), both with a 120Hz refresh rate. The iPhone 16E is expected to feature a single, vibrant OLED display, likely around 6.1-6.3 inches with high resolution, offering a 90Hz refresh rate.
  • Brightness & Clarity: Both devices are expected to offer high peak brightness levels, ensuring good visibility in various lighting conditions. The Z Fold4's displays are known for their brightness and clarity. The iPhone 16E is anticipated to provide crisp text and detailed images.

Resolution

1812 x 2176

2532x1170

Audiovisual

The camera systems of these devices cater to different photographic approaches and user expectations.

  • Camera Capabilities: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features a triple-camera setup (50MP wide, 12MP ultrawide, 10MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom) and two front cameras (10MP cover, 4MP under-display). It offers strong low-light performance and 8K video. The iPhone 16E is expected to feature an advanced dual-camera system (likely 48MP main, 12MP ultrawide) and a high-resolution front camera.
  • Audio: Both devices are expected to offer quality stereo speakers for media consumption. The Z Fold4 provides an immersive Dolby Atmos audio experience.

Front camera

4 megapixels

TrueDepth 12MP

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements differentiate these devices in daily use.

  • Connectivity: The Galaxy Z Fold4 supports 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.2. The iPhone 16E is expected to offer advanced connectivity, including 5G, Wi-Fi 7, and Bluetooth 5.4.
  • Ports & Authentication: The Z Fold4 features a USB-C port and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. The iPhone 16E is anticipated to include a USB-C port and rely on Face ID for secure authentication.
  • Physical Design: The Z Fold4 weighs 263g, transforming from a compact folded state to a larger unfolded form. The iPhone 16E is expected to maintain a traditional slab design, likely around 170-190g, offering a more compact handling experience.

Weight

263 oz

167 oz

Screen size (in)

7.6

6.1

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User sentiment for the Galaxy Z Fold4 often highlights its innovative foldable design and the versatility of its large inner screen for productivity and media. Criticisms mention the persistent screen crease, narrow cover screen for typing, and concerns about inner screen protector durability. The camera may not rival dedicated flagship slab phones, and battery life can be a concern for heavy main display users.

For the iPhone 16E, expectations would center on Apple's ecosystem, consistent performance, and a refined iOS experience, including a reliable camera and strong software support. Potential criticisms might involve the lack of groundbreaking design changes.

Users prioritizing a large, adaptable screen for multitasking and a unique form factor may prefer the Galaxy Z Fold4. Those preferring a traditional, streamlined smartphone with long-term software support, consistent performance, and a familiar design will lean towards the iPhone 16E. Both offer distinct advantages. Quality-assured refurbished options for either model can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons