Galaxy S20 FE vs Oppo Reno 8 Pro

Galaxy S20 FE
Galaxy S20 FE
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$268.29

Versus A$578.00 new

See options
Oppo Reno 8 Pro
Oppo Reno 8 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$327.00

Versus A$1,741.00 new

See options

The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, released in October 2020, and the Oppo Reno 8 Pro, launched in July 2022, are both Android smartphones designed to offer a balanced user experience. While the Galaxy S20 FE focuses on delivering core flagship features from its era, the Oppo Reno 8 Pro emphasizes a sleek design and enhanced camera capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. Both devices run on the Android operating system, though they feature different custom user interfaces.

Scores

Durability

Evaluating the practical lifespan of these devices involves considering their release timelines, software support, and repairability.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy S20 FE was released in October 2020, making it an older device compared to the Oppo Reno 8 Pro, which launched in July 2022. This age difference directly impacts the remaining software support period for each phone.
  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy S20 FE received its final major Android OS update with Android 13 and its security updates concluded around October 2025. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro, having launched with Android 12, is expected to receive two major Android updates, likely up to Android 14, and four years of security patches. This means the Reno 8 Pro offers a longer period of official software support from its manufacturer.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy S20 FE has a moderate repairability score, with some components like the battery being challenging to replace. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro generally scores well in repairability, indicating a potentially easier process for component replacement.

Release year

2020

2022

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both smartphones are equipped with processors designed to handle daily tasks efficiently, but they offer different experiences in demanding scenarios.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy S20 FE is powered by a processor that delivers strong performance for everyday applications and gaming, maintaining responsiveness across various tasks. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro features a different processor that also provides smooth operation for daily use and handles demanding applications and multitasking effectively, with users reporting stable performance even during graphically intensive gaming sessions.
  • Battery Behavior: Both devices house a 4500 mAh battery, and users generally report that both can last through a full day of typical use. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro benefits from 80W fast charging, allowing for rapid power replenishment.
  • Storage and RAM: The Galaxy S20 FE offers various configurations, typically with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, with the added flexibility of expandable storage via a microSD card. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro comes with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, but it does not support expandable storage.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both phones is delivered through vibrant AMOLED displays, though with some distinctions in their specifications.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: Both the Galaxy S20 FE and the Oppo Reno 8 Pro feature AMOLED displays, known for their deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Galaxy S20 FE has a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a 1080x2400 pixel resolution, resulting in a pixel density of approximately 407 ppi. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro offers a slightly larger 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 1080x2412 pixel resolution and a pixel density of around 394 ppi.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid user interface experience. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro boasts a higher peak brightness, reaching up to 950-1300 nits, which can enhance visibility in bright outdoor conditions. The Galaxy S20 FE's display also offers excellent brightness, though some users have noted it might be dimmer than some other devices.
  • Protection: The Galaxy S20 FE's display is protected by Gorilla Glass 3, while the Oppo Reno 8 Pro features Gorilla Glass 5 for enhanced durability against scratches.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1080 x 2412

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer versatile camera systems, each with its own strengths in capturing photos and videos.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Galaxy S20 FE features a triple camera setup with a 12MP main sensor, a 12MP ultrawide lens, and an 8MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro also has a triple rear camera system, comprising a 50MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 2MP macro lens. The Reno 8 Pro integrates a dedicated imaging Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to enhance image processing, particularly in low-light conditions.
  • Photography Performance: The main camera on the Galaxy S20 FE is generally praised for its quality in various lighting conditions, and its optical zoom is a notable feature. However, its ultrawide camera has received mixed feedback. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro's main camera excels in both daylight and low-light photography, with its NPU contributing to detailed night shots. The ultrawide and macro cameras on the Reno 8 Pro are considered less impressive by some users.
  • Front Camera and Video: Both devices are equipped with a 32MP front-facing camera for selfies. The Galaxy S20 FE can record video at up to 4K 60fps from both its front and rear cameras. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro also offers good video recording capabilities, particularly for 4K night videography.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements differentiate the user experience of these two phones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy S20 FE (in its 5G variant) and the Oppo Reno 8 Pro support 5G connectivity, along with modern Wi-Fi and Bluetooth standards. Both devices feature a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, but neither includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Build Materials and Durability: The Galaxy S20 FE features a plastic back with an aluminum frame and boasts an IP68 rating for significant water and dust resistance. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro has a glass front (Gorilla Glass 5) and an aluminum frame, with a slim profile and an IP52 rating, indicating splash resistance.
  • Physical Characteristics and Sensors: The Galaxy S20 FE measures 159.8 x 74.5 x 8.4mm and weighs 190g. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro is slightly thinner and lighter at 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.34mm and 183g. Both phones include an in-display optical fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking, alongside other standard sensors like accelerometers, gyroscopes, and compasses.

Weight

190 oz

183 oz

Screen size (in)

6.5

6,7

Network

4G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE often highlights its strong performance, vibrant display with a high refresh rate, and capable main camera as key strengths. Common criticisms include its plastic back and the eventual cessation of major software updates. For the Oppo Reno 8 Pro, users frequently praise its elegant design, bright AMOLED display, fast charging, and impressive low-light photography from its main camera. Some common concerns revolve around the performance of its ultrawide and macro cameras, as well as the presence of pre-installed software in its operating system.

Users prioritizing a device with a proven track record for balanced performance and a robust water resistance rating may find the Galaxy S20 FE well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who value a more modern design, faster charging, and enhanced low-light camera capabilities might lean toward the Oppo Reno 8 Pro. Both devices offer a solid Android experience, catering to different preferences in terms of design aesthetics and specific feature emphasis. For those considering either model, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative to extend the lifecycle of these electronic products.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons