Galaxy A73 5G vs Motorola Moto G53

Galaxy A73 5G
Galaxy A73 5G
See options
Motorola Moto G53
Motorola Moto G53
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$203.77

Versus A$975.00 new

See options

The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, released in March 2022, and the Motorola Moto G53, launched in December 2022, are both smartphones designed for everyday use. While both devices offer 5G connectivity and aim to provide a balanced user experience, they differ significantly in display technology, camera capabilities, and long-term software support. Both run on the Android operating system, offering a familiar interface for many users.

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, several factors come into play, including their release dates, software update policies, and physical durability features.

  • Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G was released in March 2022, making it slightly older than the Motorola Moto G53, which launched in December 2022. This difference in release date can impact the duration of future software support.
  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy A73 5G benefits from Samsung's commitment to providing four major Android OS upgrades and five years of security updates, extending its software lifespan significantly. In contrast, Motorola typically offers one major OS update and 2-3 years of security updates for its G-series phones, meaning the Moto G53 will likely receive fewer updates.
  • Durability Features: The Galaxy A73 5G features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for screen protection and boasts an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, offering a good level of protection against everyday elements. The Moto G53 has a water-repellent design with an IP52 rating, providing basic splash and dust resistance but less comprehensive protection than the A73 5G.

Release year

2022

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from app usage to multitasking and gaming. Both devices offer capable performance for their intended segments, though with notable differences.

  • Everyday Responsiveness: The Galaxy A73 5G is equipped with a processor that handles demanding applications and multitasking smoothly, providing a responsive user experience. The Moto G53's processor is suitable for everyday tasks like navigating the user interface and web browsing, but may show slight delays with more intensive applications or gaming.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Galaxy A73 5G typically comes with 6GB or 8GB of RAM, allowing for efficient multitasking and smoother transitions between apps. It offers 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD. The Moto G53 is available with 4GB, 6GB, or 8GB of RAM and 64GB or 128GB of internal storage, also expandable with a microSD card.
  • Battery Behavior: Both phones feature a 5000 mAh battery, designed to provide ample power for a full day of use. The Galaxy A73 5G supports 25W fast charging, allowing for quicker recharges. The Moto G53 supports 10W or 18W charging depending on the region, which is a slower charging speed.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for any smartphone, influencing everything from media consumption to daily interactions. These two devices offer distinct visual experiences.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy A73 5G features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED+ display with a resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, delivering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and sharp details. The Moto G53 comes with a 6.5-inch IPS LCD display with a lower resolution of 720 x 1600 pixels, which results in less sharpness compared to the A73 5G.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: Both smartphones offer a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid visual experience during animations and gaming.
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The Super AMOLED+ panel on the Galaxy A73 5G generally offers higher peak brightness, which can improve visibility in bright outdoor conditions. The IPS LCD on the Moto G53 provides adequate brightness for most indoor conditions, but may struggle more under direct sunlight.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

720x1600

Screen type

Super AMOLED Plus

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

For many users, the camera system is a key differentiator. Both phones offer multiple lenses, but their capabilities vary significantly.

  • Main Camera Performance: The Galaxy A73 5G features a 108 MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), which aids in capturing detailed photos and stable videos, especially in challenging lighting. The Moto G53 includes a 50 MP main camera, which performs well in good lighting conditions but lacks OIS.
  • Versatility in Photography: The A73 5G offers a more comprehensive camera setup with a 12 MP ultrawide lens, a 5 MP macro lens, and a 5 MP depth sensor, providing more options for different types of shots. The Moto G53 has a 2 MP macro lens alongside its main sensor, offering less versatility.
  • Video Recording and Selfies: The Galaxy A73 5G can record videos up to 4K resolution at 30 frames per second and features a 32 MP front camera capable of 4K video recording. The Moto G53 records video at 1080p at 30 frames per second and has an 8 MP front camera.

Main camera

108 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

32 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core specifications, several other features contribute to the overall user experience and practical utility of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity for fast mobile data. The Galaxy A73 5G includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0, along with NFC for contactless payments. It uses a USB-C 2.0 port but omits a 3.5mm headphone jack. The Moto G53 features Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, NFC, and a USB-C 2.0 port, notably retaining a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy A73 5G incorporates an optical fingerprint sensor embedded under the display for secure unlocking. The Moto G53 utilizes a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, often integrated into the power button.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A73 5G has a glass front (Gorilla Glass 5) and a plastic back, weighing 181 grams. The Moto G53 features a plastic frame and back, weighing 183 grams. Both devices offer a relatively slim profile, with the A73 5G being slightly thinner.

Weight

181 oz

183 oz

Screen size (in)

6.7

6.5

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G often highlights its vibrant Super AMOLED+ display, extended software support, and capable camera system as strong points. Users appreciate the clarity and color reproduction of the screen, as well as the versatility offered by its multiple camera lenses, particularly the main sensor with OIS. Some common criticisms include its plastic build and the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack.

The Motorola Moto G53 is frequently praised for its smooth 120Hz refresh rate display, even with its lower resolution, and its long-lasting battery. The inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack is also a positive for many users. However, criticisms often point to the lower display resolution, slower charging speed, and less robust camera performance compared to some competitors.

Users prioritizing a superior display experience, a more advanced camera system with optical image stabilization, and a longer period of software updates may find the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G better suited to their needs. Its higher resolution screen and more versatile camera setup cater to those who consume a lot of media or frequently capture photos and videos. Conversely, users who value a smoother scrolling experience on a budget, prefer a physical headphone jack, and prioritize battery life over display resolution or camera prowess might lean towards the Motorola Moto G53. Both devices offer 5G connectivity, making them suitable for users seeking modern network speeds. For those looking for an eco-friendly alternative, both models are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing a sustainable choice for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons