Galaxy A35 vs Galaxy Z Fold5

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
See options
Galaxy Z Fold5
Galaxy Z Fold5
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$759.00

Versus A$1,194.95 new

See options

The Samsung Galaxy A35 (released March 2024) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (released August 2023) represent distinct approaches within the Android smartphone market. While the A35 offers a traditional smartphone experience with a focus on core features, the Z Fold5 introduces a unique foldable design, transforming from a compact phone into a larger tablet-like display. Both devices operate on the Android platform with Samsung's One UI, but they cater to different user needs through their fundamental form factors and underlying capabilities.

Scores

Durability

When considering the practical lifespan of these devices, several factors come into play, including software support and physical resilience.

  • Software Longevity: Both the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy Z Fold5 are part of Samsung's commitment to extended software support. Users can expect approximately four years of major Android operating system updates and five years of security updates from their respective release dates. This means the Galaxy A35, being newer, will receive software support for a slightly longer period than the Galaxy Z Fold5.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A35 features an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, along with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front for screen protection. The Galaxy Z Fold5, designed with a folding mechanism, carries an IPX8 water resistance rating, meaning it can withstand submersion in fresh water, but lacks official dust resistance. Its cover screen and back are protected by Gorilla Glass Victus 2, while the inner foldable screen uses Ultra Thin Glass. The hinge mechanism on the Z Fold5 has seen improvements, with users reporting enhanced build quality compared to earlier foldable generations.
  • Repairability: The repairability of both devices varies. Traditional slab phones like the A35 generally offer a more straightforward repair process for common components. The Z Fold5's complex foldable design, particularly its hinge and inner display, can make repairs more intricate.

Release year

2024

2023

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance capabilities of the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy Z Fold5 are tailored to different usage intensities, reflecting their design philosophies.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A35 is equipped to handle everyday applications, web browsing, and social media smoothly. While it performs well for general use, some users have noted occasional minor delays when launching demanding applications or during intensive multitasking. The Galaxy Z Fold5, on the other hand, is built for high-demand tasks, offering excellent responsiveness for complex applications, graphic-intensive gaming, and seamless multitasking across its expansive display.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: The Galaxy A35 provides a capable experience for typical smartphone multitasking. The Galaxy Z Fold5, with its larger memory configuration, excels in managing numerous applications simultaneously, allowing for fluid transitions and efficient workflow, particularly when utilizing its multi-window features.
  • Storage Options: The Galaxy A35 is available with 128GB or 256GB of internal storage and supports expandable storage via a microSD card, offering flexibility for users who need more space for media and files. The Galaxy Z Fold5 comes with larger internal storage options, typically starting from 256GB and going up to 1TB, but it does not offer expandable storage.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A35 features a 5,000mAh battery, which generally provides ample power for over a full day of moderate to heavy use, with some users reporting up to 1.5 days on a single charge. The Galaxy Z Fold5 has a 4,400mAh battery. Despite the smaller capacity, its optimized components contribute to a full day of use for many users, especially with adaptive power-saving features.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a primary differentiator between these two devices, offering distinct visual environments.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: Both phones utilize Super AMOLED or Dynamic AMOLED 2X technology, known for vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Full HD+ (2340x1080 pixels) Super AMOLED display, providing a clear and engaging viewing experience for everyday content. The Galaxy Z Fold5 offers a dual-screen setup: a 6.2-inch Full HD+ (2316x904 pixels) Dynamic AMOLED 2X cover screen and a larger 7.6-inch QXGA+ (2176x1812 pixels) Dynamic AMOLED 2X main foldable display. The main screen of the Z Fold5 provides an expansive canvas for immersive viewing and productivity.
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The Galaxy A35's display can reach up to 1,000 nits in High Brightness Mode, offering good visibility in various lighting conditions. The Galaxy Z Fold5's displays are notably brighter, with the main screen capable of reaching up to 1,750 nits peak brightness, enhancing readability even in direct sunlight.
  • Refresh Rate: Both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations during general use and gaming.
  • Viewing Experience: The Galaxy A35 provides a consistent, large flat-screen experience. The Galaxy Z Fold5 offers versatility, allowing users to choose between a compact external screen for quick interactions and a large internal screen for more immersive tasks like reading, media consumption, or detailed work.

Resolution

1080x2340

1812x2176

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy Z Fold5 are designed to capture different levels of detail and versatility.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A35 features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. It performs well in good lighting, producing vibrant and detailed images, and includes a decent night mode. The Galaxy Z Fold5 also has a triple-camera system, comprising a 50MP main sensor with OIS, a 12MP ultrawide lens, and a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. Its camera system is known for high-quality, detailed photos with good dynamic range, and strong low-light performance.
  • Front Camera: The Galaxy A35 has a 13MP front-facing camera. The Galaxy Z Fold5 features a 10MP camera on its cover screen and a 4MP under-display camera on the main screen, with the cover screen camera generally offering better quality for selfies.
  • Video Recording: Both devices support 4K video recording at 30 frames per second (fps) from their main cameras. The Galaxy Z Fold5 extends this capability with 8K video recording at 30fps.
  • Audio Quality: Both phones are equipped with stereo speakers, providing a more immersive audio experience for media consumption.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity: Both the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy Z Fold5 support 5G connectivity, along with modern Wi-Fi standards and Bluetooth for wireless connections.
  • Ports and Sensors: Both devices feature a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. Neither includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. The Galaxy A35 uses an in-display fingerprint sensor, while the Galaxy Z Fold5 integrates its fingerprint sensor into the side power button. Both also offer face recognition for unlocking.
  • Dimensions and Handling: The Galaxy A35 has a traditional slab form factor, measuring 161.7 x 78 x 8.2mm and weighing 209 grams. Some users find its size and weight substantial for one-handed use. The Galaxy Z Fold5, when folded, is more compact but thicker (154.9 x 67.1 x 13.4mm) and heavier at 253 grams, offering a narrow, one-handed experience. Unfolded, it becomes a much wider, tablet-like device (154.9 x 130.1 x 6.1mm).
  • Build Materials: The Galaxy A35 features a glass back and a plastic frame, contributing to a premium feel. The Galaxy Z Fold5 utilizes an aluminum frame and glass panels on its exterior, providing a robust and refined construction.

Weight

209 oz

253 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

7.6

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and Galaxy Z Fold5 cater to distinct user preferences, each excelling in different areas based on their design and intended use.

Users frequently praise the Galaxy A35 for its vibrant display, reliable battery life that often lasts beyond a full day, and capable main camera performance in good lighting conditions. Common criticisms sometimes point to occasional performance lags with heavier applications and a less impressive low-light camera performance compared to higher-end devices. Overall, it is often seen as a strong contender for those seeking a dependable smartphone experience without the complexities of a foldable design.

The Galaxy Z Fold5 receives acclaim for its innovative foldable form factor, offering the versatility of a large tablet screen in a pocketable device. Its powerful performance, excellent multitasking capabilities, and high-quality camera system are also frequently highlighted. Some users, however, express concerns about its bulkiness when folded, the visibility of the crease on the inner display, and the durability of the inner screen protector over time, though recent models show improved resilience. The under-display camera on the main screen is also noted as being primarily suitable for video calls rather than high-quality photography.

Users prioritizing a straightforward, long-lasting battery experience and a solid camera for everyday photos will find the Galaxy A35 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who value an expansive, adaptable screen for productivity, immersive media, and advanced multitasking, and who are comfortable with a unique form factor, may lean towards the Galaxy Z Fold5. Both models are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing a sustainable choice for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons