Galaxy A35 vs Galaxy S24

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
See options
Galaxy S24
Galaxy S24
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$614.00

Versus A$1,841.10 new

See options

The Samsung Galaxy A35 (released March 2024) and the Samsung Galaxy S24 (released January 2024) represent different segments within Samsung's smartphone lineup. While both devices operate on the Android 14 operating system with Samsung's One UI, the Galaxy S24 is positioned as a flagship device with advanced performance and camera capabilities, whereas the Galaxy A35 offers a larger display and a substantial battery capacity, catering to users seeking reliable everyday functionality.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is influenced by its physical durability and the duration of its software support. Both the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 offer robust build quality and commitment to software updates, though with differing timelines.

  • Software Support: The Galaxy S24 launched with a commitment to seven generations of OS upgrades and seven years of security updates, extending its support until approximately 2031. In contrast, the Galaxy A35 is slated to receive four generations of OS upgrades and five years of security updates, with support expected until 2029.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy S24 features Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for display protection and carries an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating protection against immersion in water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. The Galaxy A35 is equipped with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ and an IP67 rating, offering protection against dust and immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes.
  • Expected Lifespan: Users prioritizing the longest possible software support and a higher degree of water and dust resistance will find the Galaxy S24 offers an extended practical lifespan. The Galaxy A35 still provides substantial software longevity and good protection for its category.

Release year

2024

2024

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance in smartphones is crucial for smooth operation, from daily tasks to more demanding applications. The Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 are equipped with different internal components that influence their responsiveness and capability.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy S24 features a current-generation processor, which provides substantial power for demanding applications, multitasking, and graphically intensive games, ensuring a highly responsive user experience. The Galaxy A35 is powered by a capable octa-core processor that handles everyday tasks, browsing, and media consumption smoothly.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Galaxy S24 typically comes with 8GB of RAM and offers storage options up to 512GB, utilizing faster UFS 4.0 storage for higher capacities, contributing to quicker app loading and data transfer. The Galaxy A35 is available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and up to 256GB of storage, using UFS 2.1 or 2.2 standards, and uniquely offers expandable storage via a microSD card.
  • Real-World Usage: Users report the Galaxy S24 is snappy and fast for general use, with some noting that intense activities like 4K video recording can lead to faster battery drain. The Galaxy A35 is generally smooth for daily tasks, though some users have noted occasional lag with heavier applications and potential heating during continuous use.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both devices offer vibrant viewing experiences with distinct characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Brightness: The Galaxy S24 features a 6.2-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a peak brightness of 2600 nits, providing exceptional visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. The Galaxy A35 has a larger 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a peak brightness of 1000 nits in High Brightness Mode, which is also suitable for outdoor use with its Vision Booster technology.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The Galaxy S24 offers an adaptive refresh rate ranging from 1Hz to 120Hz, allowing for very smooth scrolling and animations while conserving battery life when static. The Galaxy A35 provides a consistent 120Hz refresh rate for a fluid visual experience.
  • Clarity and Eye Comfort: Both phones offer FHD+ resolution, ensuring clear and sharp visuals for everyday viewing. The Galaxy S24 incorporates a higher PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) refresh rate, which can contribute to reduced eye strain for some users sensitive to display flickering.

Resolution

1080x2340

1080x2340

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 are designed to capture moments, but they differ in their capabilities and features.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy S24 features a versatile triple rear camera setup, including a 50MP wide sensor, a 12MP ultrawide sensor, and a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, allowing for detailed shots at a distance. The Galaxy A35 also has a triple rear camera system with a 50MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide sensor, and a 5MP macro lens for close-up photography.
  • Photography Performance: Users generally find the Galaxy S24's cameras produce vibrant images and smoother, stabilized videos, though some note that image processing can sometimes appear artificial. The Galaxy A35 is praised for its daylight photos, which often feature saturated colors, but its low-light performance can result in blurrier and noisier images. The macro lens on the A35 is sometimes considered a niche feature.
  • Video and Front Camera: The Galaxy S24 supports video recording up to 8K at 30 frames per second and has a 12MP front camera. The Galaxy A35 records video up to 4K at 30 frames per second with both its main and 13MP front cameras. Both devices feature stereo speakers for media consumption.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and daily convenience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity and Bluetooth 5.3. The Galaxy S24 supports Wi-Fi 6E, offering potentially faster and more stable wireless connections, while the Galaxy A35 supports Wi-Fi 6. Both utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, but neither includes a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security and Expandability: The Galaxy S24 features an ultrasonic in-screen fingerprint sensor, while the Galaxy A35 uses an optical in-screen fingerprint sensor. The Galaxy A35 offers expandable storage via a microSD card slot, a feature not present on the Galaxy S24.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy S24 is more compact and lighter, measuring 147.0 x 70.6 x 7.6mm and weighing 168g, making it easier for one-handed use. The Galaxy A35 is larger and heavier at 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2mm and 209g, which can provide a more expansive viewing experience but may feel substantial in hand.

Weight

209 oz

167 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.2

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 cater to different user needs, each with its own set of strengths and considerations based on user feedback.

The Galaxy A35 is often praised for its vibrant display, capable performance for daily tasks, and generally good battery life, especially when optimized. Users appreciate its daylight camera performance and the inclusion of expandable storage. However, some criticisms include less impressive low-light camera performance, occasional lag with very demanding applications, and a display that can appear somewhat washed out in direct sunlight. Its larger size and weight are also noted by some as a factor in handling.

Conversely, the Galaxy S24 receives acclaim for its powerful performance, exceptionally bright and adaptive display, and advanced camera features, including a telephoto lens. Its compact and lightweight design is a significant advantage for users preferring a smaller form factor. Common concerns revolve around battery life, which can be inconsistent or drain quickly under heavy use, and some users have reported that the Exynos processor variant can experience throttling or heating. The camera's image processing is sometimes described as overly artificial.

Users prioritizing a highly responsive device for intensive applications, a premium and compact design, a brighter display, and the longest possible software support will find the Galaxy S24 well-suited to their needs. Those who value a larger screen, expandable storage, a solid camera for well-lit conditions, and a dependable experience for everyday use, along with a strong commitment to software updates for a mid-range device, may lean toward the Galaxy A35. Both models, whether new or as a quality-assured refurbished option, offer a pathway to an informed and sustainable choice in mobile technology.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons