Galaxy Z Fold4 vs Oppo Reno 8 Pro

Galaxy Z Fold4
Galaxy Z Fold4
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$734.00

Versus A$3,628.00 new

See options
Oppo Reno 8 Pro
Oppo Reno 8 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$327.00

Versus A$1,741.00 new

See options

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and the Oppo Reno 8 Pro are distinct Android smartphones released in 2022, each catering to different user preferences. The Galaxy Z Fold4, launched in August 2022, stands out with its innovative foldable design, offering a large tablet-like display experience in a compact form factor. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro, released in July 2022, presents a more traditional, sleek smartphone design with a focus on camera capabilities and fast charging. While both run on the Android operating system, their core functionalities and design philosophies diverge significantly.

Scores

Durability

The longevity of a smartphone is influenced by its physical durability and the duration of software support it receives. These two devices offer different propositions in this regard.

  • Software Support: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 launched with Android 12L and is eligible for four major Android OS updates and five years of security updates, extending its software lifespan significantly, potentially until Android 16 and security patches until 2027. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro launched with Android 12 (ColorOS 12.1) and is expected to receive fewer major OS updates, though users report Android 14 running smoothly on the device.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features an Armor Aluminum frame and IPX8 water resistance, providing protection against water immersion, though it lacks official dust resistance. Its foldable nature introduces unique considerations for screen durability, with some users noting screen protector peeling over time. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro features a glass front (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and a sleek, unibody glass back with an aluminum frame, but it does not carry an official IP rating for water or dust resistance.
  • Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing extended software updates and water resistance may find the Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a longer practical lifespan, especially given Samsung's commitment to updates. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro, while built with quality materials, may see its software support end sooner, which could impact its long-term usability for some users.

Release year

2022

2022

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

Yes

No

Performance

Both devices are equipped with capable internal components designed to handle demanding applications and multitasking, though they approach performance from different architectural standpoints.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy Z Fold4 is powered by a current-generation processor that delivers robust performance for heavy apps, intensive gaming, and seamless multitasking. This processor also contributes to improved power efficiency compared to its predecessor. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro features a powerful processor that offers strong performance for gaming and everyday tasks, with some reviews noting its ability to maintain stable frames even during graphically demanding games.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy Z Fold4 houses a 4400 mAh battery. Despite its large, power-hungry displays, its efficient processor allows it to typically last a full day of moderate to heavy use, with some users reporting up to 13 hours of usage. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro comes with a 4500 mAh battery, which generally provides good battery life, often lasting a full day or more with moderate usage. It also supports 80W fast charging, allowing for rapid recharges.
  • Storage and Responsiveness: The Galaxy Z Fold4 offers 12GB of RAM and storage options up to 1TB, providing ample space and smooth operation for multiple applications. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro is available with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, which is sufficient for most users' needs. Neither device supports expandable storage via microSD cards.

Memory (GB)

12 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a primary differentiator between these two smartphones, with the Galaxy Z Fold4 offering a unique foldable form factor.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features two Dynamic AMOLED 2X displays: a 7.6-inch foldable inner screen and a 6.2-inch outer cover screen. The inner screen provides a large, immersive canvas, while the outer screen offers a more traditional smartphone experience. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro has a single 6.7-inch AMOLED display, offering a large and vibrant viewing area.
  • Resolution and Clarity: The Galaxy Z Fold4's main display has a resolution of 2176x1812 pixels, resulting in a sharp and detailed image, while its cover screen is 2316x904 pixels. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro features a Full HD+ resolution of 2400x1080 pixels, providing clear visuals for everyday use and media consumption.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: Both devices offer a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and animations. The Galaxy Z Fold4's main screen can reach up to 1200 nits peak brightness, and its adaptive refresh rate can scale down to 1Hz for power efficiency. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro's display offers up to 950 nits of peak brightness (some sources indicate 1300 nits for the Chinese variant), ensuring good visibility in various lighting conditions.

Resolution

1812 x 2176

1080 x 2412

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, but with different strengths and features tailored to their respective designs.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features a versatile triple-camera setup with a 50 MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12 MP ultrawide lens, and a 10 MP telephoto lens offering 3x optical zoom. This system is noted for its improved performance over its predecessor. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro also has a triple-camera system, including a 50 MP main sensor (Sony IMX766) with electronic image stabilization (EIS), an 8 MP ultrawide lens, and a 2 MP macro lens. It utilizes a dedicated MariSilicon X NPU for enhanced image processing, particularly in low-light video.
  • Low-Light and Video Performance: The Galaxy Z Fold4 is capable of capturing clear images even at night due to its larger pixel size and enhanced processing. Its unique form factor allows for flexible shooting modes. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro is particularly highlighted for its low-light video capabilities, with the MariSilicon X NPU contributing to brighter and more detailed videos in challenging lighting conditions, despite the absence of OIS on its main sensor.
  • Front Cameras and Audio: The Galaxy Z Fold4 has a 10 MP camera on its cover display and a 4 MP under-display camera on the main screen, offering a full-screen experience. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro features a high-resolution 32 MP front camera (Sony IMX709) that performs well in low light and offers good detail for selfies. Both devices offer stereo speakers for media consumption, with the Z Fold4 noted for its loud and clear audio.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity, along with modern Wi-Fi standards (Wi-Fi 6 for Z Fold4) and Bluetooth. The Galaxy Z Fold4 features a USB-C 3.2 port, while the Oppo Reno 8 Pro also uses a USB-C port. Neither device includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack or expandable storage via microSD card.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy Z Fold4 incorporates a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro features an optical in-display fingerprint sensor, which users have found to be fast and reliable. Both devices also offer face recognition capabilities.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy Z Fold4 weighs 263 grams and has dimensions that change significantly when folded (155.1 x 67.1 x 14.2-15.8 mm) versus unfolded (155.1 x 130.1 x 6.3 mm). Its design aims for a more balanced feel compared to previous foldable generations. The Oppo Reno 8 Pro is lighter at 183 grams and has a slim profile (161.2 x 74.2 x 7.34 mm), with a sleek, unibody design that some users find premium and comfortable to hold, though its glossy back can be slippery.

Weight

263 oz

183 oz

Screen size (in)

7.6

6,7

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and the Oppo Reno 8 Pro offer distinct smartphone experiences, each with its own set of strengths and considerations based on user feedback.

The Galaxy Z Fold4 is frequently praised for its expansive foldable display, which significantly enhances multitasking and media consumption, effectively combining a smartphone and a small tablet. Users appreciate the improved battery life and camera system compared to its predecessors, as well as Samsung's commitment to long-term software updates. Common concerns include the visibility of the screen crease, the potential for the inner screen protector to peel over time, and its relatively heavier build.

The Oppo Reno 8 Pro garners positive remarks for its sleek and premium design, vibrant AMOLED display, and strong overall performance. Its fast 80W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for very quick power-ups. The device's low-light video capabilities, enhanced by its dedicated imaging chip, are also a highlight. Criticisms often point to the absence of optical image stabilization on the main camera, the average performance of its secondary cameras, and the lack of an official IP rating for water and dust resistance.

Users prioritizing a versatile device that can transform from a standard smartphone to a large-screen tablet for productivity and immersive content will find the Galaxy Z Fold4 well-suited to their needs. Its robust software support also appeals to those seeking long-term device longevity. Conversely, users who value a traditional, slim smartphone form factor with a focus on fast charging, a bright display, and strong low-light video performance may lean towards the Oppo Reno 8 Pro. Both devices represent quality-assured options, and considering a refurbished model can be an eco-friendly alternative for either choice.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons