Galaxy S25 vs Motorola Moto E32

Galaxy S25
Galaxy S25
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$852.00

Versus A$1,399.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto E32
Motorola Moto E32
See options

The Samsung Galaxy S25, released in early 2025, and the Motorola Moto E32, launched in 2022, represent distinct segments of the smartphone market. While both operate on the Android platform, they cater to different user expectations, primarily differing in their performance capabilities, display technology, and camera systems. The Galaxy S25 is positioned as a high-end device, offering advanced features and robust specifications, whereas the Moto E32 serves as a more accessible option for essential smartphone functions.

Scores

Durability

The practical lifespan and software support differ significantly between these two devices due to their release timelines and manufacturer policies.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy S25, having been released in early 2025, benefits from being a much newer device compared to the Moto E32, which launched in 2022. This age difference inherently impacts their expected longevity.
  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy S25 is expected to receive extensive software support, with Samsung promising up to seven years of operating system upgrades and security updates from its release date. In contrast, the Moto E32, having launched with Android 11 or 12, has likely reached or is nearing the end of its major operating system update cycle by 2026, though it may still receive security patches for a period.
  • Build and Durability: The Galaxy S25 features a more premium construction with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and back, along with an aluminum frame and an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, suggesting greater resilience to daily wear and tear. The Moto E32 typically uses a plastic build with a glass front and offers basic splash resistance with an IP52 rating, indicating it is designed for less demanding environments.

Release year

2025

2022

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The core processing power and memory configurations present a clear distinction in how these devices handle various tasks.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy S25 is equipped with a current-generation flagship processor, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, manufactured on a 3nm process. This enables it to handle demanding applications, intensive multitasking, and graphically rich games with smooth and responsive performance. The Moto E32, on the other hand, utilizes an entry-level processor, such as the Unisoc T606 or MediaTek Helio G37, which is suitable for fundamental tasks like web browsing, social media, and light applications.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Galaxy S25 typically comes with 12GB of RAM and fast UFS 4.0 internal storage, ensuring efficient app switching and quick data access. The Moto E32 usually offers 2GB, 3GB, or 4GB of RAM and slower eMMC or UFS 2.0 storage, which can lead to noticeable delays when running multiple applications simultaneously or loading larger files.
  • Overall Responsiveness: Users of the Galaxy S25 can expect a consistently fluid experience across the operating system and within applications. The Moto E32 provides adequate responsiveness for its intended use, though it may exhibit occasional stutters or slower load times, particularly with more complex operations.

Memory (GB)

12 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience offered by each device's display technology and specifications varies considerably.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy S25 features a 6.2-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a Full HD+ resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels), delivering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. The Moto E32 has a larger 6.5-inch IPS LCD panel with an HD+ resolution (720 x 1600 pixels). While the Moto E32's screen is adequate for everyday viewing, the Galaxy S25 offers a significantly sharper and more immersive visual experience.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Galaxy S25 boasts a high peak brightness of 2600 nits and an adaptive 120Hz refresh rate, which provides exceptionally smooth scrolling and improved visibility in bright outdoor conditions. The Moto E32 features a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smoother experience than standard 60Hz displays, but its peak brightness is considerably lower, around 400 nits, which can make outdoor viewing more challenging.
  • Screen Protection: The Galaxy S25 includes Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for enhanced scratch and drop resistance. The Moto E32 typically features Gorilla Glass protection, though the specific version is often not specified, suggesting a more basic level of screen durability.

Resolution

1080x2340

720 x 1600

Audiovisual

The camera systems of the Galaxy S25 and Moto E32 are designed for different levels of photographic capability and versatility.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy S25 is equipped with a versatile triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12MP ultrawide lens, and a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom and OIS. This configuration allows for detailed photos across various scenarios, including excellent low-light performance and the ability to capture distant subjects clearly. The Moto E32 typically features a triple-camera system with a 50MP or 16MP main sensor, accompanied by 2MP macro and 2MP depth sensors. This setup is suitable for basic photography in good lighting conditions.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: The Galaxy S25 supports high-resolution video recording up to 8K at 30 frames per second and features a 12MP front-facing camera capable of 4K video recording. The Moto E32 records video at up to 1080p at 30 frames per second and has an 8MP front camera, sufficient for video calls and casual selfies.
  • Audio Experience: The Galaxy S25 includes stereo speakers, providing a more immersive audio experience for media consumption. The Moto E32 generally features a single loudspeaker, which is adequate for notifications and basic audio playback.

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The Galaxy S25 supports advanced connectivity standards, including 5G and Wi-Fi 7, along with Bluetooth 5.4, ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections. It features a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. The Moto E32 supports 4G LTE, Wi-Fi (b/g/n or Wi-Fi 5), and Bluetooth 5.0. It also uses a USB-C port and notably retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Galaxy S25.
  • Biometrics and Design: The Galaxy S25 incorporates an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. Its design is characterized by an aluminum frame and glass panels, contributing to a premium feel. The Moto E32 typically features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor and a plastic construction, making it lighter and potentially more resistant to minor impacts.
  • Dimensions and Weight: The Galaxy S25 is generally more compact and lighter, measuring around 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm and weighing approximately 162g. The Moto E32 is slightly larger and heavier, with dimensions around 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm and a weight of about 184-185g.

Weight

162 oz

184 oz

Screen size (in)

6.2

6,5

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy S25 and Motorola Moto E32 cater to distinct user needs, reflecting their different market positions and release years. User feedback for the Galaxy S25 often highlights its exceptional performance, vibrant display, and advanced camera capabilities as key strengths. Some users may note its compact size as a benefit for one-handed use, while others might desire a larger screen. Criticisms, when present, tend to be minor, often related to incremental upgrades over its predecessor rather than fundamental flaws.

Conversely, the Motorola Moto E32 is frequently praised for its straightforward functionality, reliable battery life, and the inclusion of features like a 90Hz display at its accessible level. Common criticisms revolve around its more modest processing power, which can lead to slower performance with demanding applications, and its limited software update longevity compared to higher-end devices.

Users prioritizing cutting-edge performance, a top-tier camera system, and long-term software support will find the Galaxy S25 well-suited to their needs. This device is ideal for individuals who engage in mobile gaming, advanced photography, or require a highly responsive device for productivity. On the other hand, users who primarily need a smartphone for essential communication, web browsing, and light media consumption, and who value simplicity and extended battery life, may find the Moto E32 to be a practical choice. Both devices, when considering refurbished options, offer an eco-friendly alternative for consumers seeking quality-assured technology.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons