Google Pixel 8a vs Oppo Reno 8

Google Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$464.00

Versus A$938.69 new

See options
Oppo Reno 8
Oppo Reno 8
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$246.00

Versus A$1,159.00 new

See options

The Google Pixel 8a, released in May 2024, and the Oppo Reno 8, launched in July 2022, are both Android smartphones designed for different user priorities. While the Pixel 8a focuses on software longevity and advanced computational photography, the Oppo Reno 8 emphasizes rapid charging capabilities and a sleek design. Both devices operate on the Android platform, offering distinct user experiences through their respective software interfaces.

Scores

Durability

The expected lifespan and software support differ between these two devices, reflecting their respective release timelines and manufacturer commitments.

  • Release Timeline: The Google Pixel 8a is a more recent device, having been released in May 2024. The Oppo Reno 8 was launched earlier, in July 2022. This difference in release date impacts their remaining support cycles.
  • Software Longevity: The Pixel 8a offers an extended software support period, with Google committing to seven years of operating system and security updates. The Oppo Reno 8 originally shipped with Android 12 and ColorOS 12.1, and while it has received updates, its long-term software commitment is typically shorter than that of the Pixel 8a.
  • Durability Features: The Pixel 8a features Gorilla Glass 3 for screen protection and an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, allowing for immersion in water up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. The Oppo Reno 8 comes with Gorilla Glass 5 for its display and, while it lacks an official IP rating, undergoes rigorous internal testing for dust and water resistance, including drop tests from heights exceeding industry standards.

Release year

2024

2022

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Both smartphones deliver capable performance for daily tasks, though they achieve this through different hardware configurations and optimizations.

  • Processing Power: The Pixel 8a is equipped with a current-generation processor that handles demanding applications and multitasking smoothly, providing a responsive user experience similar to its higher-end siblings. The Oppo Reno 8 utilizes a mid-range processor that offers fast and efficient performance for everyday use and moderate gaming.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Pixel 8a typically comes with 8GB of RAM and offers storage options of 128GB or 256GB. The Oppo Reno 8 is available with 8GB or 12GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, allowing for smooth app switching and ample space for files.
  • Battery Performance: The Pixel 8a features a 4492 mAh battery, generally providing a full day of use for most users, with wired charging up to 18W and 7.5W wireless charging. The Oppo Reno 8 has a 4500 mAh battery that also offers a full day of usage and stands out with its 80W wired fast charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in approximately 11 minutes, though it does not support wireless charging.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both devices is delivered through vibrant OLED panels, but with some key differences in specifications.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Pixel 8a features a 6.1-inch OLED display, known for deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Oppo Reno 8 offers a slightly larger 6.43-inch AMOLED display, also providing rich colors and contrast.
  • Refresh Rate and Brightness: The Pixel 8a boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, and can reach a peak brightness of 2000 nits, making it highly visible outdoors. The Oppo Reno 8 has a 90Hz refresh rate, which provides a smooth experience for most tasks, and a peak brightness of around 800 nits.
  • Clarity and Protection: Both phones offer Full HD+ resolution (1080x2400 pixels), ensuring sharp images and text. The Pixel 8a is protected by Gorilla Glass 3, while the Oppo Reno 8 features the more recent Gorilla Glass 5 for enhanced scratch resistance.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1080x2400

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, each with its own strengths in capturing photos and videos.

  • Rear Camera System: The Pixel 8a features a dual-camera setup with a 64MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) and a 13MP ultrawide lens. The Oppo Reno 8 comes with a triple-camera system, including a 50MP main sensor (with OIS support in some variants), an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 2MP macro or depth sensor.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 8a is known for its computational photography, delivering consistent and detailed images with good dynamic range and color accuracy in various lighting conditions, including a dedicated Night Sight mode. The Oppo Reno 8's main camera also performs well, especially in good lighting, and offers a dedicated night photography mode for low-light scenarios.
  • Video and Front Camera: Both devices support 4K video recording at 30 frames per second, with the Pixel 8a also offering AI-powered video editing features. For selfies, the Pixel 8a has a 13MP front camera, while the Oppo Reno 8 features a higher-resolution 32MP front camera, capable of capturing detailed self-portraits.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity, modern Wi-Fi standards (including Wi-Fi 6 for the Reno 8), Bluetooth (v5.3 for Reno 8), and NFC for contactless payments. The Pixel 8a uses a USB-C port and supports dual SIM (Nano + eSIM), while the Oppo Reno 8 also features a USB-C port and dual Nano SIM slots, but lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometrics and Design: Both phones incorporate in-display fingerprint sensors and face recognition for secure unlocking. The Pixel 8a has a plastic casing with an aluminum frame, offering a compact and rounded design. The Oppo Reno 8 features a glass front and a plastic frame, known for its thin profile and flat sides, which some users find comfortable to hold.
  • Audio Experience: The Pixel 8a includes stereo speakers for a more immersive audio experience. The Oppo Reno 8 features a single bottom-firing speaker, which provides adequate audio but may not match the depth of stereo setups.

Weight

188 oz

200 oz

Screen size (in)

6.1

6,43

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Users often praise the Google Pixel 8a for its exceptional camera performance, particularly its computational photography capabilities that deliver consistent results across various conditions. Its long-term software support, promising seven years of updates, is also a frequently highlighted advantage, ensuring the device remains current and secure for an extended period. Some common criticisms include its relatively slower charging speeds and the presence of noticeable display bezels.

The Oppo Reno 8 is frequently commended for its incredibly fast 80W wired charging, allowing for rapid battery top-ups, and its sleek, thin design. Its display is generally well-regarded for its vibrant colors. However, some users have noted that its camera performance, while capable, might not always stand out against competitors, and the absence of an official IP rating is sometimes mentioned. The lack of a headphone jack is also a point of consideration for some.

Users prioritizing a device with extensive software longevity, advanced camera features, and a compact form factor may find the Google Pixel 8a well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who value extremely fast charging, a slightly larger display, and a distinct design might lean towards the Oppo Reno 8. Both devices offer a solid Android experience, but cater to different primary user demands. For those considering either of these models, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative, extending the life cycle of these devices.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons