Galaxy S25 vs Google Pixel 9

Galaxy S25
Galaxy S25
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$852.00

Versus A$1,399.00 new

See options
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$718.00

Versus A$1,349.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S25, released in February 2025, and the Google Pixel 9, launched in August 2024, represent two distinct approaches to the flagship Android smartphone experience. While both devices offer premium features and long-term software support, they differentiate themselves through their core strengths: the Galaxy S25 emphasizes hardware performance and a feature-rich user interface, whereas the Pixel 9 focuses on advanced computational photography and a streamlined, AI-centric Android experience.

Scores

Durability

Both the Samsung Galaxy S25 and the Google Pixel 9 are designed for extended usability, reflecting a trend towards longer device lifespans in the smartphone market.

  • Release Timeline: The Google Pixel 9 was released in August 2024, preceding the Samsung Galaxy S25, which became available in February 2025. This difference in launch dates means the Pixel 9 will reach its end-of-support timeline slightly earlier than the Galaxy S25.
  • Software Support: Both manufacturers commit to extensive software longevity, offering seven years of OS and security updates for their respective devices. This commitment ensures that both phones will receive critical updates and new features for a considerable period, contributing to a prolonged practical lifespan.
  • Build Quality: Both models feature durable construction with an aluminum frame and glass on the front and back, along with an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. This level of protection contributes to their resilience against everyday wear and tear.

Release year

2025

2024

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance is a key area where the Samsung Galaxy S25 and Google Pixel 9 exhibit different philosophies, impacting how they handle various tasks.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy S25 is equipped with a current-generation processor optimized for high performance, often outperforming the Pixel 9 in raw benchmark tests. This translates to exceptionally smooth operation for demanding applications, intensive gaming, and complex multitasking.
  • System Responsiveness: The Pixel 9, powered by Google's Tensor G4 chip, is engineered for seamless daily use and excels in AI-driven tasks. While its raw processing scores may be lower, its tight integration between hardware and software ensures a fluid and responsive user experience, particularly for Google's suite of AI features.
  • Multitasking and Storage: Both devices typically come with 12GB of RAM, facilitating efficient multitasking and app switching. The Galaxy S25 offers more storage options, including a 512GB variant, while the Pixel 9 is available with up to 256GB of internal storage.

Memory (GB)

12 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both the Galaxy S25 and Pixel 9 is designed to be immersive, though they present some differences in display technology and characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a 6.2-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks with an FHD+ resolution (2340x1080px). The Google Pixel 9 sports a slightly larger 6.3-inch OLED Actua display with a 2424x1080 resolution, also providing clear visuals.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Pixel 9's Actua display can achieve a higher peak brightness of 2700 nits, which can be beneficial for outdoor visibility. Both phones feature an adaptive refresh rate that can go up to 120Hz for smooth scrolling and animations. The Galaxy S25's LTPO technology allows its refresh rate to drop as low as 1Hz, potentially contributing to power efficiency, while the Pixel 9's refresh rate can go down to 60Hz.
  • Viewing Experience: While the Pixel 9's screen is slightly larger, the Galaxy S25 is noted for being less reflective and easier to view in bright outdoor conditions. Both displays support HDR10+ video, enhancing the viewing experience for compatible content.

Resolution

1080x2340

1080 x 2424

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the Samsung Galaxy S25 and Google Pixel 9 are central to their appeal, each offering distinct strengths in photography and videography.

  • Camera Hardware and Versatility: The Galaxy S25 features a triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor, a 12MP ultrawide, and a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. This dedicated telephoto lens provides enhanced zoom capabilities. The Pixel 9, on the other hand, comes with a dual-camera system, comprising a 50MP main sensor and a 48MP ultrawide lens.
  • Image Processing and Quality: The Pixel 9 is highly regarded for its computational photography, producing images with natural colors, excellent detail, and strong low-light performance, particularly from its main and ultrawide cameras. The Galaxy S25 delivers sharp and detailed photos, with some users noting its vivid colors and good performance in low light, especially with its main camera.
  • Video Capabilities and Features: The Galaxy S25 supports 8K video recording, offering higher resolution video capture. Both phones offer 4K video recording across their cameras. The Pixel 9's video quality is often praised for its sharpness, color accuracy, and dynamic range. The Galaxy S25's ultrawide video clips are also noted for their quality.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy S25 and Pixel 9 support modern connectivity standards, including 5G and advanced Wi-Fi. The Galaxy S25 features Bluetooth 5.4. Both devices utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy S25 incorporates an ultrasonic under-display fingerprint reader for secure unlocking. The Pixel 9 also features an in-display fingerprint sensor, though some users have reported occasional struggles with its speed.
  • Physical Characteristics: The Galaxy S25 is generally more compact and lighter, with dimensions of 146.9mm x 70.5mm x 7.2mm and a weight of 162g. The Pixel 9 is slightly larger and heavier, measuring 152.8mm x 72.0mm x 8.5mm and weighing 198g. The Galaxy S25 is noted for its comfortable in-hand feel.

Weight

162 oz

198 oz

Screen size (in)

6.2

6.3

Network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy S25 and Google Pixel 9 each present a compelling package for different user priorities. User feedback often highlights the Galaxy S25's robust hardware performance, making it a strong contender for those who engage in demanding applications or mobile gaming. Its feature-rich One UI and dedicated telephoto camera are frequently praised. Some users, however, note that while its camera is dependable, it might not always lead the pack in every scenario, and battery life for very heavy users could be a consideration.

Conversely, the Google Pixel 9 receives consistent acclaim for its exceptional camera capabilities, particularly its computational photography, natural image rendering, and strong low-light performance. Its clean, stock Android experience and deep integration of AI features are also significant advantages for many users. Some feedback suggests that while its overall performance is smooth, its raw processing power might not match the S25, and some users find it slightly heavier.

Users prioritizing a powerful, versatile device with extensive customization options and a dedicated zoom lens may find the Samsung Galaxy S25 well-suited to their needs. Those who value a streamlined software experience, cutting-edge computational photography, and advanced AI features will likely lean towards the Google Pixel 9. Both devices offer long-term software support, making them viable choices for an extended period. For those considering a more sustainable option, exploring quality-assured refurbished versions of either model can be an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons