Galaxy A54 vs Motorola Moto G14

Galaxy A54
Galaxy A54
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$334.00

Versus A$714.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto G14
Motorola Moto G14
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$182.00

Versus A$271.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A54 and the Motorola Moto G14 are both Android smartphones released in 2023, targeting users seeking reliable mobile experiences. While the Galaxy A54, launched in March 2023, positions itself as a robust mid-range device with a focus on display quality and camera performance, the Moto G14, released in August 2023, offers a more budget-conscious approach with a clean software experience and strong battery life. Both devices run on the Android operating system, providing access to a wide ecosystem of applications and services.

Scores

Durability

Evaluating the long-term usability of a smartphone involves considering its software support, physical resilience, and ease of maintenance.

  • Software Longevity: The Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a notable commitment to software updates, promising four major Android OS upgrades and five years of security updates from its release. This means it is expected to receive updates up to Android 17, extending its functional lifespan significantly. In contrast, the Motorola Moto G14 is guaranteed one major Android OS upgrade (to Android 14) and three years of security updates, providing a shorter, though still respectable, support period.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A54 features Corning Gorilla Glass 5 on both its front and back, contributing to its resistance against scratches and drops, and boasts an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, allowing it to withstand immersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes. The Moto G14 uses Panda Glass for screen protection and has an IP52 rating, indicating splash and dust resistance, but not full water immersion.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A54 generally receives a higher repairability score, with some assessments placing it around 6.25 out of 10 or even 8.4 out of 10 under French environmental legislation, suggesting it is reasonably accessible for repairs. The Moto G14 has a lower repairability score, around 5.0 out of 10, indicating that repairs might be more challenging due to the use of adhesives and the need to disassemble multiple components.

Release year

2023

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of these devices is influenced by their internal components, impacting how smoothly they handle daily tasks and more demanding applications.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A54 is equipped with a processor that provides a balanced experience for everyday use, handling multitasking and most applications smoothly. Users can expect responsive navigation and efficient operation across various tasks. The Moto G14's processor is well-suited for light tasks and general smartphone usage, such as browsing and social media, but may exhibit noticeable lag or slower response times when running multiple demanding applications or graphically intensive games.
  • Memory and Storage: The Galaxy A54 typically offers configurations with 6GB or 8GB of RAM, which contributes to its ability to manage several applications simultaneously without significant slowdowns. It comes with 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, expandable via a hybrid microSD card slot. The Moto G14 usually comes with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, also expandable with a dedicated microSD card slot, which is sufficient for average use but can be a limiting factor for heavy multitaskers.
  • Battery Endurance: Both smartphones feature a 5000 mAh battery capacity, designed to provide extended usage. The Galaxy A54 generally offers good battery life, with users often reporting over a full day of moderate to heavy use, sometimes extending to 1.5 days. The Moto G14 also delivers strong battery performance, with many users finding it can last up to two days with moderate usage, benefiting from its less power-intensive display and processor. Both support wired fast charging, with the A54 supporting 25W and the G14 supporting 20W.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on a smartphone is largely defined by its display technology, resolution, and overall brightness.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Samsung Galaxy A54 features a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. Its 1080x2340 pixel resolution (FHD+) provides sharp and detailed visuals. The Motorola Moto G14 sports a 6.5-inch IPS LCD panel with a 1080x2400 pixel resolution (FHD+), offering clear images and good viewing angles, though it may not match the contrast levels of an AMOLED screen.
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The Galaxy A54's display can reach a peak brightness of 1000 nits in High Brightness Mode (HBM), making it highly legible even in bright outdoor conditions. The Moto G14's IPS LCD panel offers decent brightness for outdoor viewing, but its legibility might be less optimal under direct sunlight compared to the A54's brighter AMOLED screen.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The Galaxy A54 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, which results in smoother scrolling, more fluid animations, and a more responsive feel during gaming and general navigation. The Moto G14 has a standard 60Hz refresh rate, which is adequate for most daily tasks but will not offer the same level of visual fluidity as a higher refresh rate display.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2400

Screen type

Super AMOLED

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both devices aim to capture quality images and videos, though with differing capabilities and results.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A54 features a versatile triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a 12MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. This configuration allows for a range of photographic options, from wide landscapes to detailed close-ups. The Moto G14 comes with a dual-camera system, comprising a 50MP main sensor and a 2MP macro lens, providing essential photography functions.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A54's main camera excels in well-lit conditions, producing vibrant photos with accurate colors, good dynamic range, and strong detail. Its OIS significantly aids in low-light photography, resulting in clearer images with reduced noise. The ultrawide camera is also capable, and the macro lens offers decent close-up shots. The Moto G14's main camera performs well in optimal lighting, capturing detailed shots, but its low-light performance can be challenging, often resulting in grainier images, though a dedicated Night mode can improve results.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: The Galaxy A54 supports 4K video recording at 30 frames per second (fps) with both its rear and front cameras, offering high-resolution video capture. Its 32MP front camera delivers excellent selfies with good detail and dynamic range. The Moto G14 records video at Full HD (1080p) at 30fps from both its rear and 8MP front cameras. Its front camera is suitable for daylight selfies and video calls.
  • Audio Experience: Both devices are equipped with stereo speakers, enhancing the audio experience for media consumption. The Moto G14 specifically highlights Dolby Atmos support, which can provide a more immersive sound profile.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

32 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience and device utility.

  • Connectivity Standards: The Samsung Galaxy A54 supports 5G connectivity, offering faster mobile data speeds where available, along with Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. The Motorola Moto G14 is limited to 4G LTE networks and features Wi-Fi 802.11 ac (dual-band) and Bluetooth 5.0.
  • Physical Ports and Sensors: The Galaxy A54 includes a USB Type-C 2.0 port for charging and data transfer but omits a 3.5mm headphone jack. It features an optical fingerprint sensor integrated under the display for secure unlocking. The Moto G14 provides a USB Type-C 2.0 port and retains the 3.5mm headphone jack, which is convenient for users with wired audio accessories. Its fingerprint sensor is conveniently located on the side of the device.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A54 measures 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm and weighs 202g, featuring a design with glass panels on the front and back. The Moto G14 is slightly taller but narrower and thinner at 161.46 x 73.82 x 7.99 mm and lighter at 177g, often featuring a plastic or vegan leather back for a comfortable grip.

Weight

202 oz

177 oz

Screen size (in)

6.4

6.5

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A54 frequently praises its vibrant Super AMOLED display, reliable camera performance, especially in daylight and with OIS-assisted low light, and Samsung's commitment to long-term software updates. Common criticisms sometimes point to its processor not being the most powerful in its segment for heavy gaming, and the absence of a headphone jack.

The Motorola Moto G14 is often commended for its clean, near-stock Android experience, impressive battery life, and the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, which are appreciated for media consumption. Users occasionally note that its performance can be modest for demanding tasks and that its LCD screen, while clear, doesn't offer the same visual punch as an AMOLED panel.

Users prioritizing a premium display, robust water resistance, and extended software support for future-proofing may find the Samsung Galaxy A54 to be a more suitable choice. Its camera system also offers more versatility and better low-light capabilities. Conversely, users who value a clean Android interface, excellent battery endurance, a traditional headphone jack, and a lighter device for everyday communication and media consumption might lean towards the Motorola Moto G14. Both devices offer compelling features for their respective user bases, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be an eco-friendly alternative to purchasing new.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons