Galaxy A14 5G vs Motorola Moto E32

Galaxy A14 5G
Galaxy A14 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$220.00

Versus A$280.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto E32
Motorola Moto E32
See options

The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, released in January 2023, and the Motorola Moto E32, launched in May 2022, are both smartphones designed for everyday use. While both devices aim to provide a reliable mobile experience, they differ in their connectivity options, display clarity, and software support timelines. The Galaxy A14 5G offers next-generation network capabilities and a sharper screen, whereas the Moto E32 focuses on a streamlined user interface and a water-repellent design. Both run on the Android operating system, though with different versions and update commitments.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release dates and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G was released in January 2023, making it a more recent device compared to the Motorola Moto E32, which launched in May 2022. This difference in release year impacts their expected software longevity.
  • Software Support: The Galaxy A14 5G launched with Android 13 and is expected to receive two major Android OS updates, concluding with Android 15, along with four years of security updates until 2027. In contrast, the Moto E32 typically launched with Android 11 or Android 12, with some variants promising two years of security updates. This means the Galaxy A14 5G generally offers a longer period of official software and security support.
  • Physical Durability: Both phones feature plastic builds. The Moto E32 includes an IP52 water-repellent design, offering some protection against splashes and dust. The Galaxy A14 5G does not specify a similar official IP rating, suggesting less resistance to environmental elements.

Release year

2023

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from app usage to media consumption and multitasking.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A14 5G is equipped with an octa-core processor, with some variants featuring speeds up to 2.2 GHz. This allows for smooth gaming and streaming experiences, and generally responsive operation for everyday applications. The Moto E32 also uses an octa-core processor, with some versions featuring speeds up to 2.3 GHz, designed to provide a consistent user experience for common tasks. However, some variants of the Moto E32 may come with a processor that offers more modest performance.
  • Memory and Storage: The Galaxy A14 5G offers more flexible configurations, with RAM options typically ranging from 4GB to 8GB and internal storage from 64GB to 128GB, expandable via microSD. The Moto E32 generally comes with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, also expandable with a microSD card. The higher RAM options on the Galaxy A14 5G can contribute to smoother multitasking.
  • Battery Life: Both devices are powered by a substantial 5000 mAh battery, which typically provides a full day of use for most users. The Galaxy A14 5G supports 15W fast charging, while the Moto E32 supports 18W fast charging, allowing for quicker recharges when needed.

Memory (GB)

4 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for any smartphone, influencing everything from reading to watching videos.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G features a 6.6-inch PLS LCD screen, offering a slightly larger viewing area. The Motorola Moto E32 comes with a 6.5-inch IPS LCD display. Both display types provide good color reproduction and viewing angles.
  • Resolution and Clarity: The Galaxy A14 5G boasts a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels, resulting in a sharper image with approximately 399 pixels per inch. The Moto E32 has an HD+ resolution of 720 x 1600 pixels, with a pixel density of around 268 pixels per inch. This difference means the Galaxy A14 5G will display finer details and sharper text.
  • Refresh Rate: Both smartphones feature a 90Hz refresh rate, which contributes to smoother scrolling and a more fluid visual experience compared to standard 60Hz displays.

Resolution

1080 x 2408

720 x 1600

Screen type

PLS LCD

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

For many users, camera capabilities are a significant consideration, capturing everyday moments and special events.

  • Rear Camera System: The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G features a triple rear camera setup, headlined by a 50-megapixel main sensor, accompanied by 2-megapixel macro and 2-megapixel depth sensors. This main sensor performs well in good lighting conditions, producing detailed and vibrant photos, though it may struggle in low-light environments. The Motorola Moto E32 also offers a triple rear camera system. Some variants feature a 50-megapixel main sensor, while others come with a 16-megapixel main sensor, both typically paired with 2-megapixel macro and depth sensors.
  • Front Camera and Video: The Galaxy A14 5G includes a 13-megapixel front camera, capable of capturing clear selfies in adequate lighting. Both devices support video recording at 1080p resolution at 30 frames per second. The Galaxy A14 5G's front camera is noted for good detail and skin tone.
  • Audio Experience: The Galaxy A14 5G's speaker output is generally considered loud enough for media consumption and calls. Both phones include a 3.5mm headphone jack, allowing for wired audio connections.

Main camera

50 megapixels

16 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and device utility.

  • Connectivity: A key differentiator is network support. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G offers 5G connectivity, enabling faster download and upload speeds in compatible areas. The Motorola Moto E32 is limited to 4G LTE networks. Both support Wi-Fi (Wi-Fi 5 for A14 5G, Wi-Fi 4/5 for E32) and Bluetooth (5.2 for A14 5G, 5.0 for E32). The Galaxy A14 5G also includes NFC for contactless payments.
  • Physical Design and Handling: The Galaxy A14 5G measures approximately 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm and weighs around 202-205 grams. The Moto E32 is slightly more compact and lighter, at about 163.95 x 74.94 x 8.49 mm and weighing 184-190 grams. Both devices feature a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking.
  • Ports and Sensors: Both smartphones retain the convenience of a 3.5mm headphone jack and use a USB-C port for charging and data transfer.

Weight

201 oz

184 oz

Screen size (in)

6.6

6,5

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G and Motorola Moto E32 each present a distinct set of features catering to different user priorities. Users often praise the Galaxy A14 5G for its sharper display and the inclusion of 5G connectivity, which offers a more future-proof experience for mobile data. Its longer software support commitment is also a frequently noted advantage, providing extended security and access to newer Android features. Some users, however, have noted that its performance can feel less fluid at times compared to higher-end devices, and its camera, while capable in good light, may not excel in challenging conditions.

The Motorola Moto E32 is often appreciated for its water-repellent design and generally consistent performance for everyday tasks. Its 90Hz display also contributes to a smooth user experience. Criticisms sometimes revolve around its lower display resolution and the more limited software update policy compared to the Galaxy A14 5G. The variations in its processor and main camera specifications across different regions or models can also be a point of confusion for some consumers.

Users prioritizing a sharper screen, 5G connectivity, and a longer software support window may find the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G more aligned with their needs. Conversely, those who value a slightly more compact and lighter device with some water resistance, and who primarily use their phone for essential daily functions, might lean towards the Motorola Moto E32. Both devices are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers seeking reliable technology. Ultimately, the choice depends on which features are most critical for an individual's daily mobile usage.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons