Galaxy Z Fold4 vs Motorola Moto E32

Galaxy Z Fold4
Galaxy Z Fold4
Starting at

Refurbished price:A$738.00

Versus A$3,628.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto E32
Motorola Moto E32
See options

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (released August 2022) and the Motorola Moto E32 (released May/October 2022) represent two distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy Z Fold4 is a premium foldable device, offering a large, adaptable screen experience, while the Moto E32 is a traditional, entry-level smartphone designed for essential daily use. Both devices operate on the Android platform, but they cater to vastly different user needs and expectations through their hardware and software implementations.

Scores

Durability

The expected practical lifespan of these devices varies significantly due to their market positioning and manufacturer support policies.

  • Release Timeline and OS Support: The Galaxy Z Fold4, launched in August 2022, shipped with Android 12L and is eligible for four major Android OS updates, extending its software support up to Android 16. It also receives five years of security updates, projected until 2027. In contrast, the Moto E32, released around May to October 2022, typically receives fewer major Android updates, often one or two, starting from Android 11 or 12 depending on the region. This means the Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a considerably longer period of official software and security support.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features an Armor Aluminum frame, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ on its cover screen and back panel, and an IPX8 water resistance rating, indicating protection against submersion. Its foldable display also incorporates structural enhancements for improved resilience. The Moto E32 has an IP52 water-repellent design, offering protection against splashes and dust, and typically uses a plastic frame and back. While the Z Fold4 is designed with premium, robust materials, the Moto E32 offers practical splash resistance for everyday scenarios.
  • Repairability and Longevity: While specific repairability scores differ, the complex foldable mechanism of the Z Fold4 can make repairs more intricate. However, its premium build materials contribute to its overall physical longevity. The Moto E32, with its more conventional design, may offer simpler repair pathways for common components, though its overall component quality is aligned with an entry-level device.

Release year

2022

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

Operating system

Android

Android

Foldable

Yes

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two smartphones are tailored for different usage intensities, reflecting their respective hardware configurations.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy Z Fold4 is equipped with a high-performance processor, enabling it to handle demanding applications, intensive multitasking, and graphic-heavy games with fluidity. Users can expect rapid app loading and seamless transitions between multiple open applications. The Moto E32 features an entry-level processor, which is suitable for everyday tasks such as web browsing, social media, and light applications. While it provides a responsive experience for basic use, it may exhibit slower performance or occasional stutters when running more resource-intensive apps or complex games.
  • Multitasking and Storage: With 12 GB of RAM, the Galaxy Z Fold4 excels at multitasking, allowing users to run numerous applications simultaneously and switch between them without noticeable slowdowns. It offers substantial internal storage options (256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB) for extensive app libraries and media, though it does not support expandable storage. The Moto E32 typically comes with 4 GB of RAM, which is sufficient for basic multitasking but may require more frequent app closures for optimal performance. Its 64 GB of internal storage can be expanded significantly via a microSD card, offering flexibility for users who need more space for photos and videos.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy Z Fold4 houses a 4400 mAh battery, designed to power its dual, high-resolution displays and powerful components. Users generally report that it can last through a full day of moderate use, with fast wired and wireless charging capabilities. The Moto E32 is equipped with a larger 5000 mAh battery, which, combined with its less demanding hardware and lower-resolution display, often translates to extended battery life, with many users reporting two days of usage on a single charge under light conditions. It supports 10W charging, with some variants capable of faster charging.

Memory (GB)

12 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display experience on these two devices highlights a significant difference in technology and design philosophy.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features two Dynamic AMOLED 2X displays: a 7.6-inch foldable inner screen and a 6.2-inch outer cover screen. These OLED panels offer deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast, providing a premium visual experience. The inner display boasts a resolution of 2176 x 1812 pixels, while the cover screen has 2316 x 904 pixels, both delivering sharp images. The Moto E32 comes with a 6.5-inch IPS LCD display with a resolution of 720 x 1600 pixels (HD+). This LCD panel provides clear visuals for everyday content, though it does not offer the same level of contrast or color depth as an AMOLED screen.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: Both displays on the Galaxy Z Fold4 support an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120Hz, ensuring smooth scrolling and responsive interactions. The AMOLED technology also allows for high peak brightness, making content easily viewable even in bright outdoor conditions. The Moto E32's IPS LCD display also features a 90Hz refresh rate, which provides a smoother visual experience than standard 60Hz screens, particularly for scrolling and animations. Its brightness levels are adequate for indoor use and most outdoor situations, though it may struggle under direct sunlight compared to the Z Fold4's brighter panels.
  • Screen Size and Viewing Experience: The Galaxy Z Fold4's unique foldable design allows it to transform from a compact smartphone to a tablet-like device, offering an expansive 7.6-inch screen for immersive media consumption, productivity, and multitasking. The 6.2-inch cover screen provides a convenient, traditional smartphone experience when folded. The Moto E32's 6.5-inch flat display offers a generous viewing area for a traditional smartphone, suitable for watching videos, browsing, and general app usage.

Resolution

1812 x 2176

720 x 1600

Screen type

Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

The camera systems on these devices are designed to meet different photographic needs, from advanced versatility to reliable everyday capture.

  • Rear Camera Capabilities: The Galaxy Z Fold4 features a versatile triple-camera system on the rear, including a 50 MP wide-angle main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12 MP ultrawide camera, and a 10 MP telephoto lens capable of 3x optical zoom. This setup allows for detailed photos across various scenarios, including improved low-light performance and the ability to capture distant subjects with clarity. The Moto E32 typically includes a triple-camera setup with a 16 MP wide-angle main sensor (some regional variants feature a 50 MP main sensor), complemented by 2 MP macro and 2 MP depth sensors. This configuration is suitable for general photography, close-up shots, and portraits with background blur, performing best in well-lit conditions.
  • Front Camera and Video Recording: For selfies and video calls, the Galaxy Z Fold4 has a 10 MP camera on its cover screen and a 4 MP under-display camera on the main foldable screen. It supports high-resolution video recording, including UHD 8K at 24 frames per second, offering advanced capabilities for content creators. The Moto E32 is equipped with an 8 MP front-facing camera, which provides clear images for selfies and video calls. Both front and rear cameras on the Moto E32 can record video at 1080p resolution at 30 frames per second.
  • Audio Experience: The Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a rich audio experience with stereo speakers, providing immersive sound for media consumption. Its microphone quality is designed for clear calls and recordings. The Moto E32 features a single bottom-ported speaker, which is adequate for casual audio playback and calls. It also retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, offering a traditional option for wired audio accessories.

Main camera

50 megapixels

16 megapixels

Front camera

4 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements differentiate these two devices in terms of user interaction and connectivity.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The Galaxy Z Fold4 supports advanced connectivity standards, including 5G for high-speed mobile data, Wi-Fi 6E for faster wireless internet, and Bluetooth 5.2 for efficient accessory pairing. It features a USB-C 3.2 port for data transfer and charging. The Moto E32 provides 4G LTE connectivity, Wi-Fi (b/g/n), and Bluetooth 5.0, which are standard for reliable everyday wireless communication. It includes a USB-C port for charging and data, and notably, a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Z Fold4.
  • Biometric Security and Sensors: Both devices incorporate a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for secure and convenient unlocking. The Galaxy Z Fold4 also includes a comprehensive suite of sensors such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, and barometer, enhancing its capabilities for various applications and features. The Moto E32 includes essential sensors like an accelerometer and proximity sensor for basic functionality.
  • Physical Design and Handling: The Galaxy Z Fold4, with its foldable design, offers a unique form factor that is heavier at 263 grams. When folded, it is thicker but narrower, making it easier to hold in one hand, while unfolded it provides a large, thin display. The Moto E32 is a lighter device, typically weighing between 184-190 grams, and has a conventional slab design with dimensions that make it comfortable for single-handed use. Its build materials are primarily plastic, contributing to its lighter feel.

Weight

263 oz

184 oz

Screen size (in)

7.6

6,5

Network

5G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and the Motorola Moto E32 cater to fundamentally different segments of the smartphone market, each excelling in its intended role. User feedback for the Galaxy Z Fold4 often highlights its innovative foldable design, powerful performance, and versatile camera system as key strengths. Users appreciate the large inner display for productivity and media consumption, and the overall premium experience. Common discussions around the Z Fold4 often revolve around the durability of the folding screen and the hinge, though it is generally considered robust for a foldable device.

For the Motorola Moto E32, users frequently praise its long battery life, the smooth experience provided by its 90Hz display within its category, and its clean Android software. It is often seen as a reliable device for essential daily tasks. Criticisms sometimes point to its performance for demanding applications and the basic nature of its camera system compared to higher-end phones.

Users prioritizing a cutting-edge, versatile device with top-tier performance, advanced camera capabilities, and a unique adaptable screen for both smartphone and tablet use may prefer the Galaxy Z Fold4. Its extended software support also appeals to those seeking long-term device relevance. Conversely, users who need a dependable smartphone for everyday communication, web browsing, and media consumption, with excellent battery longevity and a straightforward user experience, will find the Moto E32 well-suited to their needs. It is a practical choice for those who value core functionality and a traditional form factor.

Both devices, when considering refurbished options, offer an eco-friendly alternative to purchasing new, providing quality-assured choices for various budgets and preferences.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons