Compare models
Galaxy A35 vs Motorola Moto G62 5G
- 1-year warranty
- Free standard shipping
- Free 30-day returns
Differences at a glance
The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Motorola Moto G62 5G are both smartphones designed for everyday use, offering a balance of features and performance. The Galaxy A35, released in March 2024, is a more recent device, while the Moto G62 5G launched in June 2022. A key difference lies in their display technology and the extent of their software support, which can significantly impact the user experience over time.
Scores
Durability
The longevity of a smartphone is often determined by its physical resilience and the duration of its software support. These two devices present different profiles in terms of their expected practical lifespan.
- Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy A35 was released in March 2024, making it a newer device compared to the Motorola Moto G62 5G, which launched in June 2022. This difference in release dates directly impacts their software support cycles.
- Software Support: The Galaxy A35 benefits from Samsung's extended update policy, promising four major Android OS updates and five years of security updates. In contrast, the Moto G62 5G typically receives one major Android OS update and around two to three years of security updates. This means the Galaxy A35 will receive software support for a considerably longer period, offering enhanced security and access to newer features.
- Physical Durability: The Galaxy A35 features Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front for improved screen protection and carries an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating it can withstand immersion in up to 1 meter of fresh water for 30 minutes. The Moto G62 5G has a water-repellent design, which offers some protection against splashes but lacks an official IP rating for submersion, though some sources indicate an IP52 rating for splash and dust resistance.
Release year
2024
2022
Compatible with latest Update
Yes
No
Operating system
Android
Android
Foldable
No
No
Performance
Evaluating the performance of these smartphones involves looking at how smoothly they handle daily tasks, multitasking, and more demanding applications, alongside their battery endurance.
- Processing Capabilities: The Samsung Galaxy A35 is equipped with a processor that generally provides a responsive experience for everyday applications and multitasking. Users report that it handles demanding apps and gaming smoothly, though some have noted occasional minor lags when launching heavier applications. The Motorola Moto G62 5G features a processor that is suitable for general use, web browsing, and light gaming, offering reliable performance for typical smartphone activities.
- Memory and Storage: The Galaxy A35 is available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and storage options of 128GB or 256GB, with expandable storage via a microSD card. The Moto G62 5G typically comes with 4GB, 6GB, or 8GB of RAM and 64GB or 128GB of internal storage, also supporting microSD card expansion. The higher base RAM and storage options on the A35 can contribute to smoother multitasking and more space for applications and media.
- Battery Life: Both devices are powered by a 5000 mAh battery, which is a common capacity designed to provide a full day of use for most users. User experiences with the Galaxy A35 suggest it can last approximately 1.5 days with average usage, though heavy use of features like 5G or hotspot can reduce this.
Screen quality
The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both devices offer different visual experiences.
- Display Technology: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, known for producing deep blacks, high contrast, and vibrant colors. The Motorola Moto G62 5G comes with a 6.5-inch IPS LCD screen, which offers good color reproduction and viewing angles.
- Resolution and Clarity: Both phones offer Full HD+ resolution, with the Galaxy A35 at 2340x1080 pixels and the Moto G62 5G at 2400x1080 pixels. This ensures sharp images and text for typical viewing distances.
- Brightness and Smoothness: Both displays support a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations. The Galaxy A35's Super AMOLED panel can reach a peak brightness of up to 1000 nits, which aids visibility in bright outdoor conditions. While the Moto G62 5G's LCD offers good brightness, it typically does not reach the same peak levels as an AMOLED display.
Resolution
1080 x 2340
1080 x 2400
Screen type
Super AMOLED
IPS LCD
Audiovisual
For many users, the camera system is a crucial aspect of a smartphone, influencing how they capture and share moments.
- Rear Camera Systems: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a triple rear camera setup, including a 50-megapixel main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. The Motorola Moto G62 5G also has a triple rear camera system, consisting of a 50-megapixel main sensor, an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 2-megapixel macro lens.
- Photography Performance: The Galaxy A35 generally produces good quality photos in well-lit conditions, with vibrant colors. Its OIS helps in capturing clearer images, especially in challenging lighting or when there's slight movement. The Moto G62 5G delivers competent photos for its category in good lighting.
- Video Recording and Front Camera: The Galaxy A35 supports video recording up to 4K resolution at 30 frames per second (fps) with both its main and front 13-megapixel camera. The Moto G62 5G records video at Full HD (1080p) at 30fps and features a 16-megapixel front camera.
- Audio Experience: Both phones offer stereo speakers, providing a more immersive audio experience for media consumption. The Galaxy A35's audio quality is noted as above average, maintaining clarity even at higher volumes. The Moto G62 5G also includes Dolby Atmos audio for enhanced sound.
Main camera
50 megapixels
50 megapixels
Front camera
13 megapixels
16 megapixels
Miscellaneous
Beyond the core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall usability and convenience of a smartphone.
- Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity, ensuring access to faster mobile networks. The Galaxy A35 includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, offering newer standards for wireless communication. The Moto G62 5G supports Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.1. Both phones feature a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. A notable difference is the presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack on the Moto G62 5G, which is absent on the Galaxy A35.
- Biometric Security: The Samsung Galaxy A35 incorporates an in-display fingerprint sensor for convenient unlocking. The Motorola Moto G62 5G utilizes a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, often integrated into the power button. Both devices also offer face recognition capabilities.
- Build Materials and Handling: The Galaxy A35 features a metal body and a glass back, contributing to a more premium feel, though some users find it slightly bulky and heavy at 209 grams. The Moto G62 5G weighs 184 grams and has a plastic build, making it lighter and potentially easier to handle for some users.
Weight
209 oz
184 oz
Screen size (in)
6.6
6,5
Network
5G
5G
SIM card
Dual Physical SIM
Dual Physical SIM
Carrier compatibility
Unlocked
Unlocked
Connector
USB-C
USB-C
What the community thinks
When choosing between the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Motorola Moto G62 5G, user priorities play a significant role. The Galaxy A35, being a more recent release, generally offers a more modern experience with its Super AMOLED display, extended software support, and higher durability rating. Users often praise its vibrant screen, solid build quality, and the promise of long-term software updates. However, some users have reported occasional performance stutters and a display that might not be bright enough in direct sunlight.
The Motorola Moto G62 5G, while an older model, remains a capable device for general use. It is often appreciated for its lighter build and the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature less common in newer smartphones. Its performance is suitable for everyday tasks, though its software update longevity is more limited compared to the Galaxy A35. Users who prioritize a headphone jack and a lighter device might find the Moto G62 5G appealing.
Users prioritizing long-term software support, a more durable build with an official IP rating, and a superior display technology may prefer the Samsung Galaxy A35. Conversely, users who value a traditional headphone jack, a lighter form factor, and are content with a shorter software update cycle might lean towards the Motorola Moto G62 5G. Both devices offer 5G connectivity and a large battery, catering to essential modern smartphone needs. For those considering either model, exploring quality-assured refurbished options can provide an eco-friendly alternative.








